Idiocy
Is Bringing The End Of The World
Idiocy
Is Bringing The End Of The World
Paul
Craig Roberts
Here
is Jason Ditz on the coming end of the world:
Vladimir
Soloviev explains the failure of Putin’s policy of appeasement:
If
you were the president of France or the prime minister of the UK, would you
permit criminally insane Washington to drag you into military conflict with
Russia? https://www.infowars.com/get-ready-russia-trump-takes-to-twitter-to-threaten-strike-on-syria/
I
didn’t think so. I wouldn’t either. So what’s with Macron and May? What’s with
the French and British governments? What’s with the French and British media? I
read recently that former UK Labour prime minister Tony Blair is now worth $100
million, his payoff for lying to the UK government and people in order to
support the George W. Bush regime’s invasion of Iraq. Have Macron and May been
promised the same?
It
makes no sense for the UK and French governments to make themselves targets of
a military power against which they have no possibility of defense. It makes no
sense that their peoples and media sit silently while one French president and
one British prime minister endanger not only France and the UK but the entirety
of Europe. What’s with the European Union? There is only silence as Europe, and
the world with it, are taken to the brink of annihiliation. This makes no
sense.https://www.globalresearch.ca/taking-the-world-to-the-brink-of-annihilation/5635456
People
in Ghouta, doctors in Ghouta, and Russian experts who have arrived on the scene
report that there is no sign of any chemical attack. Not only did Syria not use
chemical weapons against the civilians that it liberated, there was no chemical
attack, not even a false flag one staged by the US supported mercenaries who
have been driven out of Ghouta by the Syrian Army. In other words, the chemical
attack is entirely a hoax.
To
keep the hoax from being confirmed by independent investigation, Washington vetoed
a UN Security Council resolution to send in neutral experts to evaluate the
claim of chemical attack. Why would Washington prevent an investigation that
would prove Washington’s allegation? Clearly, Washington would only prevent an
investigation that would disprove the false allegation. There is no doubt
whatsoever that Washington’s allegation is false and is being used as an excuse
to force Russia to fight or to accept Washington’s hegemony in the Middle East.
What
if there was a chemical attack? Why does it matter to people who are killed
whether it was by bullets, bombs, missiles, or chemicals? Why is it so bad to
use chemicals instead of Hellfire missiles? Why is it OK for Washington and
Israel to blow up schools, hospitals, weddings, funerals, market places, and
homes full of women and children with missiles, but not OK to kill people with
chemicals? Why is it worth starting World War 3 over a hoax chemical weapons
attack or a real one?
Americans,
for the most part a clueless people, have no awareness of the risk that the
criminally insane government in Washington is taking with their lives. What if
the Russians mean what they say and do not again turn the other cheek and back
down? What happens if Russia replies to force with force?
Why
is it that only a few Internet sites are asking this question?
/https://www.niagarafallsreview.ca/content/dam/thestar/news/canada/2021/09/25/huawei-executive-meng-wanzhou-receives-warm-welcome-upon-return-to-china/_1_meng_wanzhou_2.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.