Putin is keeping my ridicule of the Washington Post
alive, but apparently the Kremlim is prepared to issue me a passport. As the
current vice chairman of the Federal Reserve is an Israeli citizen and the
former chairman of the Israeli central bank, I suppose I can have a second
passport. Will have to look into this.
Deep State’s Attempt To Suppress India’s Gold Demand
29, 2016Financial Markets, Gold, Market Manipulation, Precious MetalsDeep
State, Modi, war on cash
primary objective of the Indian currency demonetization was to sharply reduce
gold demand in the world’s most important retail market, India, one that is controlled
by the Deep State oligarchy via a captured agent, its Prime Minister [Modi].
The manner in which the demonetization was carried out indicates some kind of
Demonetization Denotes Severe Stress in the Global Gold Market
is becoming clear that the Indian currency demonetization is actually a planned
attack on Indian gold demand, launched to disrupt gold prices and discredit
gold as an asset class. The attack was required to alleviate severe stress in
the global gold market that is becoming increasingly difficult for the Deep
State controllers to contain.
two decades, physical gold has been migrating from the west to the east in
increasing quantities. Numerous reports cross-confirm that the world’s leading
refineries are operating at capacity to convert western gold into the kilo
products demanded by Asian buyers. Refiners also confirm that the sourcing of
western gold has become problematic, as supplies dry up in the face of voracious
world, and particularly eastern demand.
central bankers and their Deep State handlers have made it clear that they
intend to transition to a cashless society. However, they are not yet ready to
make this transition. Therefore, their current focus is to start the process by
eliminating high-denomination currency, such as Euro 500 and USD 50 and 100
notes. At the same time, they are working to digitize the payment
infrastructure, a prerequisite to the elimination of cash.
problem is the steady awakening of the people to the disturbing implications of
a cashless society, and to the assault on human liberty it represents. The Deep
State oligarchs must implement their agenda before the people mobilize to
prevent it from being imposed upon them.
Deep State oligarchs understand that the western governments they commandeer
are bankrupt. To continue operations, they must tap into the people’s private
wealth for funding. In fact, the IMF has produced a position paper recommending
a “one off capital levy of 10%” (a 10% wealth tax), to deal with western
governments’ intractable fiscal problems. The authors of this paper state that
the “levy” must be imposed at night and by total surprise, to prevent citizens
from being able to take any steps to avoid it.
type of ambush is exactly what just happened in India, with its shock
IMF’s proposal does nothing to change governments’ current trajectory of
greater deficits and debt; the money raised would simply be used to service
existing debt. This means the first capital levy will just be one of many going
forward. Governments’ only solution is to expropriate the private wealth of the
people, which is exactly what the IMF has admitted.
people have cash and other private monetary assets outside of the banking
system when the “capital levy” is imposed, governments will lose out. This is
one of their primary motivations to eliminate cash: in order to maximize
proceeds from the capital levy, they need the greatest possible amount of money
within the banking system, in non-withdrawable, digitized form, when the levy
is not in the interests of governments if people figure out that they are far
better off being their own bankers, by privatizing their monetary assets, than
handing them over to commercial bankers, who have become wards and enforcement
agents of the state. Therefore, a full scale campaign is underway to demonize
cash and to make precious metals appear dangerous by routinely pulverizing
the meantime, supplies of physical metals in the west constantly diminished and
are now strained. This means that the bullion banks’ LBMA and Comex paper price
suppression activities must steadily escalate for them to maintain control of a
market that is spinning out of their control. Unlike eastern investors, western
investors tend to buy into rising prices, as they chase momentum. Rising prices
can lead to a buying stampede. If a buying stampede were to break out in
today’s supply-stressed precious metals market, prices would surge, which would
be antithetical to the Deep State oligarchs’ agenda.
that Deep State operatives can do nothing to increase western gold supply,
their only options are to somehow discover supply elsewhere, and/or to crush
“somehow” is India, a nation whose people possess an estimated 20,000 tons of
gold, and who buy hundreds more tons of it each year. Prime Minister Modi, the
Deep State establishment’s captured and controlled facilitator, has been
instructed to obtain supply and control demand of gold in India, and he has
been working overtime to achieve both objectives ever since his election.
Modi launched a Paper Gold scheme, whereby the Indian people were urged to
tender their personal gold holdings to the state, in exchange for “notes” and
“bonds” paying less-than-inflation interest rates on the value of the gold they
provided. The notes are irredeemable for gold for at least five years, by which
time the gold will be long gone from India and used in the bullion banks’
market rigging and other for-profit operations. Modi’s Paper Gold scheme
failed, because the Indian people did not trust it, and correctly so.
Modi imposed a 10% import duty on gold (India produces next to no gold, so
virtually all of it is imported). This resulted in a multi-week strike by
jewelers, which did reduce demand, one of the two aims of the Deep State
shortly, this scheme failed, too, because gold smuggling surged, enabling the
Indian people to obtain the gold they desire at prices roughly 5% over global
spot, reasonable in the circumstances.
a companion effort to crimp demand, Modi enacted a special reporting
regulation. Enacted in 2015, it requires anyone purchasing jewelry or precious
metals having a value of 200,000 rupees or more (the equivalent of roughly US$
2,900) to present an Indian PAN Card. PAN stands for Permanent Account Number,
a ten digit alpha-numeric number issued by India’s Tax Department to
individuals and businesses. The PAN enables tax personnel to track all of a
card holder’s financial transactions over their entire lifetime.
17% of India’s population have obtained a PAN number to date, meaning that 83%
of the population are unable to purchase $2,900 or more worth of jewelry or
bullion in a single transaction; without a PAN Card, it is illegal to do so.
This regulation has reduced jewelry and bullion purchases by upscale Indians
who do have PAN but do not want their personal transactions permanently
recorded. Alternatively, it has led them to make smaller purchases that do not
require presentation of a PAN Card.
the PAN regulation curbed demand in the $3,000+, high end of the market, it did
nothing to address the vibrant, lower end, cash market. Smaller purchases of
jewelry and bullion have traditionally been paid in cash, using 500 and 1,000
rupee currency notes. This was the Deep State’s Achilles’ heel in India, and
they decided to deal with it.
on November 8, 2016, in a shock move, Modi “extinguished” all Indian 500 and
1000 rupee notes. Holders of the old notes have been required to exchange them
for new ones, but the process has been extremely difficult and time consuming.
Further, there are sharp restrictions on the amount of new currency citizens
can obtain. Withdrawals are capped at 40,000 rupees per week, roughly $575.00.
After paying for living expenses (90% of Indian purchases are made with cash),
very little is left over for discretionary purchases such as gold jewelry.
Given that the demonetization was specifically timed to occur in the middle of
the robust festival and wedding season, the reduction in demand has been
pronounced. Jewelers in Mumbai, the nation’s largest retail market by far,
report sales being off by up to 90%.
believe that the primary objective of the Indian currency demonetization was to
sharply reduce gold demand in the world’s most important retail market, India,
one that is controlled by the Deep State oligarchy via a captured agent, its
Prime Minister. The manner in which the demonetization was carried out
indicates some kind of desperation, because it defied all economic prudence,
logic, humanitarian regard and common sense. India is the only country where
this kind of attack on demand could have been carried out, and this is why it
occurred there. It indicates to us that the bullion banking cabal is coming up
against the wall, and that there is severe supply – demand stress in the global
gold market that is rapidly becoming non-containable. Desperate times are
producing desperate measures by the manipulators.
is critical to note that the Governor of the Reserve Bank of India up until
mid-2016, Raghuram Rajan, declined a second three year term. Rajan was a former
Chief Economist at the International Monetary Fund, the “capital levy” people.
He is also a member of the Group of Thirty, along with Larry Summers, the head
cheerleader for the elimination of one hundred dollar bills in the United
States, and cash in general. Much more important, Rajan has now become Vice
Chairman of the Bank for International Settlements, the so-called “central bank
of central banks,” and long regarded as the chief architect and enabler of
global gold manipulation and price oppression. He has been characterized in the
press as being “a vocal votary for increased coordination among central banks.”
Clearly, an important Deep State global agenda is now in play.
and the Trump victory have demonstrated that the people can only be pushed so
far, but the Deep State oligarchs are far too addicted to easy money and
god-like power to hear the message. They are pushing forward as if nothing
whatsoever has changed in the world. The retention by the people of financial
liberty is far more important to them than Brexit or Trump, and we believe they
will defend their rights to it, particularly as they awaken to the full
implications of the tyranny that will be unleashed by its elimination.
demand rebuilds from the shock demand reduction that has occurred in India, we
believe the market for precious metals will become stronger than ever. First,
India has discredited governments’ prized monopoly product: fiat currency.
Second, India’s demonetization-related gold demand shock has no effect
whatsoever on demand from Russia, China and the rest of Asia, which is stronger
than ever. Third, the fiscal and monetary realities of governments throughout
the west continue to worsen, strengthening the already compelling case for
precious metals. Fourth, and as we have pointed out in previous articles,
supply cannot withstand even a fractional redeployment of liquid personal
assets into metals, without prices being forced significantly higher than where
they are today. And fifth, the bullion banks and Deep State schemers are
running out of curve balls to throw at the people. In fact, the stunt they just
pulled in India might be their last, at least of anywhere near this magnitude.
While we put nothing past them, including desperate dumping of remaining
western central bank metals holdings (which might not even exist at this late
stage) and prohibitions that the people will realize they must ignore if they are
to have any chance of remaining financially free, it seems clear to us that
they are fast running out of options.
One additional inference we draw from events in India is that it almost
certainly proves the United States gold reserve is gone. What has happened in
India indicates that a critical supply – demand imbalance exists in gold, which
required an unprecedented, draconian and reckless “solution.” Actually, it has
solved nothing; it has only bought the oligarchs some time, and probably not
much of it. If western, and particularly U.S. gold reserves had been available,
they almost certainly would have been deployed before a massive, destructive
currency demonetization in the world’s second largest nation, by population,
would have been ordered.
Dougherty is the creator of Inferential Analytics (IA), a forecasting method
that applies to events proprietary, time-tested principles of human instinct,
desire and action. In his view, forecasting methods not fundamentally based
upon principles of human action are unlikely to be reliable over time. He is a
graduate of Tufts University (BA) and Harvard Business School (MBA), is a 35+
year veteran of the business trenches and has developed IA over a period of 15+
The Tyranny at Standing
Rock: The Government’s Divide-and-Conquer Strategy Is Working
By John W. Whitehead
November 28, 2016
“We must, indeed, all hang
together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.”— Benjamin Franklin, as
quoted in The Works of Benjamin Franklin
Divide and conquer.
It’s one of the oldest
military strategies in the books, and it’s proven to be the police state’s most
effective weapon for maintaining the status quo.
How do you conquer a
Distract them with football
games, political circuses and Black Friday sales. Keep them focused on their
differences—economic, religious, environmental, political, racial—so they can
never agree on anything. And then, when they’re so divided that they are
incapable of joining forces against a common threat, start picking them off one
What we’re witnessing at
Standing Rock, where activists have gathered to protest
the Dakota Access Pipelineconstruction on Native American land, is just the
latest incarnation of the government’s battle plan for stamping out any sparks
of resistance and keeping the populace under control: battlefield tactics,
military weaponry and a complete suspension of the Constitution.
Militarized police. Riot
and camouflage gear. Armored vehicles. Mass arrests. Pepper spray. Tear gas.
Batons. Strip searches. Drones. Less-than-lethal weapons unleashed
with deadly force. Rubber bullets. Water cannons. Concussion
grenades. Arrests of journalists. Intimidation tactics. Brute force.
This is what martial law
looks like, when a government disregards constitutional freedoms and imposes
its will through military force.
Only this is martial law
without any government body having to declare it.
This is martial law
packaged as law and order and sold to the public as necessary for keeping the
heavy-handed lessons in how to rule by force have become standard operating
procedure for a government that communicates with its citizenry primarily
through the language of brutality, intimidation and fear.
What Americans have failed
to comprehend is that the police state doesn’t differentiate.
In the eyes of the
government—whether that government is helmed by Barack Obama or Donald Trump or
Hillary Clinton—there is no difference between Republicans and Democrats,
between blacks and whites and every shade in the middle, between Native
Americans and a nation of immigrants (no matter how long we’ve been here),
between the lower class and the middle and upper classes, between religious and
non-religious Americans, between those who march in lockstep with the police
state and those who oppose its tactics.
This is all part and parcel
of the government’s plan for dealing with widespread domestic unrest, no matter
A 2008 Army War College report revealed that
“widespread civil violence inside the United States would force the defense
establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend
basic domestic order and human security.” The 44-page report goes on to warn
that potential causes for such civil unrest could include another terrorist
attack, “unforeseen economic collapse, loss of functioning political and
legal order, purposeful domestic resistance or insurgency,
pervasive public health emergencies, and catastrophic natural and human
Subsequent reports by the
Department of Homeland Security call on the government to identify, monitor and
label right-wing and left-wing activists, military veterans and sovereign citizens as extremists (the
words extremist and terrorist are used interchangeably in the reports).
These reports indicate that
for the government, anyone seen as opposing the government—whether they’re
Left, Right or somewhere in between—is labeled an extremist.
The liberal left will not
speak up for the conservative right.
The rightwing will not
speak up for the leftwing.
The economic elite will not
speak up for the economically disadvantaged and vice versa.
The ranchers will not speak
up for the environmentalists, and the environmentalists will not speak up for
The Democrats will not
criticize endless wars, drone killings, militarized police, private prisons,
etc., when sanctioned by their candidate. Same goes for the Republicans.
Are you starting to get the
What we’re dealing with is
a full-blown case of national hypocrisy.
For too long now, the
American people have allowed their personal prejudices and politics to cloud
their judgment and render them incapable of seeing that the treatment being
doled out by the government’s lethal enforcers has remained consistent, no
matter the threat.
The government’s oppressive
tactics have not changed.
The same martial law
maneuvers and intimidation tactics used to put down protests and muzzle
journalists two years ago in Ferguson and Baltimore are
being used to flat-line protesters and journalists at
Standing Rock this year.
The same infiltration and
surveillance of ranch activists opposing the Bureau of Land Management in Oregon and Nevada over the
past several years were used against nonviolent anti-war protesters more than a decade
ago. That same mindset was embodied in the use of surveillance against those
who gathered for Barack Obama’s inauguration eight years ago.
The more things change, the
more they stay the same.
The sticking point is not
whether Americans must see eye-to-eye on these varied issues but whether they
can agree that no one should be treated in such a fashion by their own
Our greatest defense
against home-grown tyranny has always been our strength in numbers as a
America’s founders hinted
at it again and again. The Declaration of Independence refers to “one
people.” The preamble to the Constitution opens with those
three powerful words: “We the People.” Years later, the Gettysburg Address declared that we are
a “government of the people, by the people, for the people.”
Despite these stark
reminders that the government exists for our benefit and was intended to serve
our needs, “We the People” have yet to marshal our greatest weapon against
oppression: our strength lies in our numbers.
Had 318 million Americans
taken to the streets to protest the government’s SWAT team raids that left
innocent children like Aiyana Jones or Baby Bou Bou dead or scarred,
there would be no 80,000 SWAT team raids a year.
Had 318 million Americans
raised their voices against police shootings of unarmed citizens such as Alton Sterling and Walter Scott, there would be far less
use of excessive force by the police.
Had 318 million Americans
stood shoulder-to-shoulder and rejected the ruling oligarchy, pork barrel
legislation, profit-driven prisons, endless wars and asset forfeiture schemes,
government corruption would be the exception rather than the rule.
Had 318 million Americans
told the government to stop drilling through sacred Native American lands, stop
spraying protesters with water cannons in below-freezing temperatures, stop
using its military might to intimidate and shut down First Amendment activity,
and to stop allowing Corporate America to dictate how the battle lines are
drawn, there would be no Standing Rock.
Unfortunately, 318 million
Americans have yet to agree on anything, especially the source of their
This is how tyrants come to
power and stay in power.
Authoritarian regimes begin
with incremental steps. Overcriminalization, surveillance of innocent citizens,
imprisonment for nonviolent—victimless—crimes, etc. Slowly, bit by bit, the
citizenry finds its freedoms being curtailed and undermined for the sake of
No one speaks up for those
being targeted. No one resists these minor acts of oppression. No one
recognizes the indoctrination into tyranny for what it is.
As I point out in my book Battlefield America: The War on the
American People, historically this failure
to speak truth to power has resulted in whole populations being conditioned to
tolerate unspoken cruelty toward their fellow human beings, a bystander
syndrome in which people remain silent and disengaged—mere onlookers—in the
face of abject horrors and injustice.
Time has insulated us from
the violence perpetrated by past regimes in their pursuit of power: the
crucifixion and slaughter of innocents by the Romans, the torture of the
Inquisition, the atrocities of the Nazis, the butchery of the Fascists, the
bloodshed by the Communists, and the cold-blooded war machines run by the
military industrial complex.
We can disassociate from
such violence. We can convince ourselves that we are somehow different from the
victims of government abuse. We can treat news coverage of protests such as
Standing Rock and the like as just another channel to flip in our search for
better entertainment. We can continue to spout empty campaign rhetoric about
how great America is, despite the evidence to the contrary. We can avoid
responsibility for holding the government accountable. We can zip our lips and
bind our hands and shut our eyes.
In other words, we can
continue to exist in a state of denial.
Whatever we do or don’t do,
it won’t change the facts: the police state is here.
“There comes a time,”
concluded Martin Luther King Jr., “when silence is betrayal.”
The people of Nazi Germany
learned this lesson the hard way.
A German pastor who openly
opposed Hitler and spent the last seven years of Nazi rule in a concentration
camp, Martin Niemoller warned:
First they came for the
Socialists, and I did not speak out—Because I was not a Socialist. Then they
came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—Because I was not a Trade
Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—Because I was
not a Jew. Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
The people of the American
Police State will never have any hope of fighting government tyranny if we’re
busy fighting each other.
When all is said and done,
the only thing we really need to agree on is that we are all Americans.
So if this isn’t your fight—if
you believe that authority is more important than liberty—if you don’t agree
with a particular group’s position on an issue and by your silence tacitly
support the treatment meted out to them—if you think you’re a better citizen or
a more patriotic American—if you want to play it safe—and if don’t want to risk
getting shot, tased, pepper-sprayed, struck with a baton, thrown to the ground,
arrested and/or labeled an extremist—then by all means, remain silent. Stand
down. Cower in the face of the police. Turn your eyes away from injustice. Find
any excuse to suggest that the so-called victims of the police state deserved
what they got.
But remember, when that
rifle (or taser, or water cannon, or bully stick) finally gets pointed in your
direction—and it will—when there’s no one left to stand up for you or speak up
for you, remember that you were warned.
The Major Purveyor of ‘Fake
News’ is the CIA-Corporate Complex
The US corporate media, its
strings pulled by the modern version of the Central Intelligence Agency’s old
Operation MOCKINGBIRD media influencing operation, is laughably accusing Russia
of generating «fake news» to influence the outcome of the American presidential
election. In a November 24, 2016, article in the CIA-connected Washington
Post, reporter Craig Timberg reported: «Russia’s increasingly sophisticated
propaganda machinery — including thousands of botnets, teams of paid human
‘trolls,’ and networks of websites and social-media accounts — echoed and
amplified right-wing sites across the Internet as they portrayed Clinton as a
criminal hiding potentially fatal health problems and preparing to hand control
of the nation to a shadowy cabal of global financiers».
The Post’s article is worthy of the CIA-generated propaganda spun by
the paper at the height of the Cold War-era MOCKINGBIRD.
Contrary to what
the Post reported about right-wing accounts of Hillary Clinton’s ties
to «a shadowy cabal of global financiers, the vanquished Democratic presidential
nominee and her husband, via the slush fund known as the Clinton
Foundation, was closely linked to a variety of «shadowy
global financiers», including those who serve as executives of Goldman Sachs
and J P Morgan Chase. The Clinton cabal was more at home in the gatherings of
the secretive syndicates of the Bilderberg Group, Bohemian Club, and the
Council on Foreign Relations than they were at labor union and student
The Post was
clearly fed its poorly-sourced and anecdotal-based article on Russian «fake
news» by the usual suspects of Russia-bashers and CIA mouthpieces, including The
Daily Beast; former US ambassador to Moscow Michael McFaul; Rand Corporation;
George Washington University’s Elliott School of International Affairs; the
Foreign Policy Research Institute in Philadelphia; and a website called
«PropOrNot.com» or «Is It Propaganda Or Not?», which is linked not only to
George Soros-funded anti-Russia websites but also to conveyors of CIA
disinformation like Snopes.com. The Post article is nothing more than
an advertisement for PropOrNot.com, which bills itself as a «Propaganda
Identification Service, since 2016».
The media influencing
operation targeting Russia appears to be an outgrowth of the US State
Department’s Counter-Information Team of the Bureau of International
Information Programs. The team, established under the George W. Bush
administration, was a resurrection of the Cold War-era US Information Agency’s
(USIA) Bureau of Information, which was designed to counter «Soviet»
disinformation. The truth of the matter was that many of the news reports from TASS,
Radio Moscow, and Novosti, branded as «Soviet disinformation»
by USIA, were, in fact, truthful reports on CIA covert operations, including
political assassinations, biological warfare, and weapons and narcotics
smuggling. Today, the media mouthpieces for the CIA and Soros replace
Soviet-era media outlets as their main targets for derision with RT television
and Sputnik News.
In 2013, Amazon signed a
$600 million contract with the CIA to provide cloud computing services to the
agency. Amazon’s owner, Jeff Bezos, also happens to own The
Washington Post. Considering the long close relationship between the
newspaper and the CIA, the Post is the last media outlet that should
be writing about fake news. In 1981, the Post published a fake news
story about a 7-year old heroin addict named «Jimmy». Not only was the story
fake, but the Post’s assistant managing editor, Bob Woodward of
Watergate infamy, submitted the fake Jimmy story to the Pulitzer Prize award
committee. The Post reporter who wrote the piece, Janet Cooke, did
receive a Pulitzer but had to return it after the story was deemed to be fake.
Cooke was fired by the paper but Woodward, a longtime US intelligence
mouthpiece, kept his job. So much for The Washington Post and fake
In its piece on «fake
news», the Post linked to a «blacklist» of alleged «fake news sites»
maintained by the mysterious PropOrNot.com. A November 25, 2016, article
in Fortune magazine by Mathew Ingram rightfully criticized
the Post’s reliance on PropOrNot.com for its story. Ingram wrote:
«PropOrNot’s Twitter account, which tweets and retweets anti-Russian sentiments
from a variety of sources, has only existed since August of this year. And an
article announcing the launch of the group on its website is dated last month».
It is very likely that PropOrNot.com is
a creation of The Washington Post’s cloud computing business
partner, the CIA. PropOrNot.com calls itself a group of «concerned American
citizens with a wide range of backgrounds and expertise, including professional
experience in computer science, statistics, public policy, and national
security affairs». There are more than enough CIA employees who possess such
PropOrNot.com published a
list that would make disgraced Senator Joseph McCarthy, the purveyor of «red
lists» of Communists in the 1950s, very proud. PropOrNot.com lists 200 sites,
which it claims are «routine peddlers of Russian propaganda». On the list are Strategic
Culture.org, globalresearch.ca, drudgereport.com, counterpunch.com,
wikileaks.com, wikileaks.org, wikispooks.com. zerohedge.com, and truthdig.com.
RT.comand Sputniknews.com also appear on the list. Not on
the list are media outlets that have notoriously engaged in fake news
reporting. These include The New York Times, USA Today, NBC News,
CBS News, The New Republic, CNN, and the Atlanta
Outrageously, the blacklist
includes USSLIBERTYVETERANS.org, a website maintained by survivors of the
willful and unprovoked 1967 Israeli air and naval attack on the US intelligence
ship «USS Liberty» in the eastern Mediterranean. The attack killed 34 American
Navy sailors and intelligence personnel and the website, in part, is dedicated
to their memory. The inclusion of the Liberty veterans’ website strongly
suggests the involvement of pro-Israeli shills, all neoconservatives, who nest
within a number non-profit think tanks in Washington, DC and may be associated
The inclusion of some white
nationalist «hate sites» on the PropOrNot.com list is reminiscent of the
tactics of the misnamed «Southern Poverty Law Center» (SPLC) in Montgomery,
Alabama. The center is neither «Southern» or suffering from poverty since it
has $175 million in the bank and owns two buildings in Montgomery, both of
which have been dubbed by critics as «Poverty Palaces». The Washington
Post often quotes SPLC officials in attacking president-elect Donald Trump
and his advisers.
PropOrNot.com utilizes a
very subjective methodology to come up with its black list: «it does not matter
whether the sites listed here are being knowingly directed and paid by Russian
intelligence officers, or whether they even knew they were echoing Russian
propaganda at any particular point: If they meet these criteria, they are at
the very least acting as bona-fide ‘useful idiots’ of the Russian intelligence
services, and are worthy of further scrutiny». And who does PropOrNot.com propose
for placing other websites on its blacklist and putting them under «further
scrutiny?» Perhaps they want the CIA, National Security Agency, Federal Bureau
of Investigation, or US Cyber Command to engage in harassment in violation of
the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Other alleged «Russian
propaganda» websites included on the blacklist are infowars.com,
intrepidreport.com, intellihub.com, informationclearinghouse.info,
corbettreport.com, moonofalabama.org, floridasunpost.com, opednews.com,
oilgeopolitics.com, gatesofvienna.net, blackagendareport.com,
mintpressnews.com, ahtribune.com, thefreethoughtproject.com,
consortiumnews.com, washingtonsblog.com, asia-pacificresearch.com,
filmsforaction.com (which advances the rights of Native Americans),
thirdworldtraveler.com, and activistpost.com.
Many of the blacklisted
websites have something in common: they supported Trump for president. The
Washington Post heartily endorsed Hillary Clinton for president, which
makes the blacklist appear to be, in part, nothing more than sour grapes on the
part of the Post and its unnamed «experts» working for PropOrNot.com.
PropOrNot.com also managed
to salt its list with a few obvious fake news websites, including
www.superstation95.com, which purports to be a New York FM radio station;
baltimoregazette.com; and veteranstoday.com. This has the effect of tarnishing
the legitimate sites on the list by associating them with fabulists and
Two members of the Ronald
Reagan administration, Director of the Office of Management and Budget David
Stockman (davidstockmanscontracorner.com) and Assistant Secretary of the
Treasury for Economic Policy Paul Craig Roberts (paulcraigroberts.org)
find their websites on the blacklist. Also blacklisted is former Republican
presidential candidate Ron Paul (ronpaulinstitute.org).
The blacklist highlighted
by The Washington Post appears to be more of a censorship target list
developed for the not-to-be Hillary Clinton administration. For
the Post to engage in blacklisting other press outlets merely because
it does not care for their news content is shameful beyond belief. If any
outlet should be ordered to cease its operations for not acting in the public
interest, it is The Washington Post for grossly distorting the news
and misleading the public from the end of World War II to the present day.
If one wants «fake news»
the intelligence-corporate complex is the place to go. From corporate media
reports about bogus Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and the Pentagon’s hiring
of British public relations firm Bell Pottinger to create fake news stories
about terrorist attacks in Iraq to the use of a group called the «White
Helmets» that pumps out fake stories regarding the Syrian government, the
corporate media is full of «fake news» fed to it by an omnipresent US
intelligence-run psychological warfare infrastructure.
Did you know that Great Britain is going down the
drain because the citizens want to remain British?
Did you know that the British are inherently racist,
jingoistic, bigots, and obnoxious because they don’t want to become Pakistanis,
Syrians, Africans or some multicultural combination?
Did you know that the British people voted to leave
the European Union not because they oppose their loss of sovereignty to a
foreign and unelected power in Brussels, but because of their hatred and
contempt of foreigners, especially the dark-skinned ones that the EU forces
them to accept in unlimited numbers?
While Cloughley calls the white British racists, last
May these racists elected a Muslim, Sadiq Khan, Mayor of London. Can you
imagine the Mayor of London, England, is a Muslim named Sadiq Khan? Either the
British are not racists or the Pakistanis outnumber Englishmen in London, which
might before long be renamed New Islamabad.
Cloughley calls the British people every name in the
book and then upbraids them for “the racial abuse” of using words such as
“Pakis” and “niggers.”
Cloughley, obviously a self-hating Britisher, reports
that Brexit (the British people’s vote to restore their sovereignty by
departing the EU) has caused hate crimes to rise by 41 percent. Why would
departing the EU cause a rise in hate crimes?
Perhaps the answer is related to the fact that the use
of traditional British words, such as “wog,” has been criminalized. “Wog” is a
British word that according to the English Oxford Dictionaries means simply “a
person who is not white.” Despite this innocent meaning, for a white Britisher
to use this word as a description of a not white person or group can result in
hate crime charges. What is most peculiar about politically correct speech is
that political correctness itself marginalizes non-white people by eliminating
the use of words that mean non-white. Political correctness has made it so
shameful to be non-white that ordinary words such as negro and wog that mean a
non-white person have been turned into slurs. How can non-whites have racial
pride when words that mean non-white cannot even be used?
As Cloughley’s screed against the British people
develops, we see that it is a brief against leaving the EU. As the EU was an
OSS (original name of the CIA) initiative, Cloughley, knowingly or unknowingly,
is serving as a CIA asset.
Cloughley is at perfect ease calling his fellow
British every hateful name, seemingly impervious to the fact that if he were
not calling white people names he would be committing hate crimes.
In addition to their loss of sovereignty to an
unelected EU commission sitting in a foreign country, what the British people
are objecting to is that they have been made second class citizens in their own
country. White people in Great Britain have to be very careful about what words
they use to describe illegal and legal aliens or they can be charged with “hate
crimes” for employing vocabulary formerly used by prime ministers themselves.
Yes, Britain is going down the drain. But not because
it is trying to rescue itself at this late date from loss of sovereignty and
multicultural hell. Britain is going to hell because, judging by the closeness
of the Brexit vote, almost half of the British population have been so
brainwashed that they are ashamed to be British.
NOTE: I have been reminded from England that WOG
stands for Worthy Oriental Gentlemen, a term imposed by British officers on
uncouth troops to stop them from using racist names for colonized peoples.