The Demise of the West: Part II –Western Elites Are
Anti-Democratic
The Demise of the West: Part II
Western Elites Are Anti-Democratic
Paul Craig Roberts
It is customary to speak of
Western countries as democracies. In actual fact, the countries are oligarchies
in which voting, which conveys the semblance that government is accountable to
the people, seldom changes anything as elected officials are constrained by the
power of organized interest groups. President Trump is the latest example. He
has been blocked in his goal of reducing tensions with Russia.
The European Union has been an
anti-democratic undertaking from the beginning. Deception was the method. At
first it was a free trade zone. Then a common currency. Then unified fiscal
policies which means centralization and political union with formerly sovereign
countries becoming provinces in a European government. Countries that voted
down joining were subjected to threats and browbeating and forced to vote again
by which time the media had convinced the people that they had no alternative
to joining or they would be “left behind” in a backwater existence.
Despite the facts, politicians
maintained the fiction that EU member countries remained democratic and
responsive to the will of their citizens. German Chancellor Merkel, who ended
her career by her unilateral decision to impose a million or more illegal Third
World immigrants on Germans and Germans’ resources, destroyed this fiction.
Merkel clearly does not care what
the German people think. She revealed again her total disdain for democracy at
a recent event of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation in Berlin where she condemned
those who think political leaders should listen to the will of the people. The
German people, she said, are just “individuals who are living in a country;
they do not define the German people.” The German people are whoever migrates to
Germany as a result of the UN Migration Pact that she signed despite its
rejection by the German citizens of Germany. “Nation states,” Merkel declared,
“must today be prepared to give up their sovereignty.” Politicians must not
listen, she said, to the will of their citizens when it comes to questions of
immigration, borders, and sovereignty.
The French president, Emmanuel
Macron, backed her up. Macron declared that French “nationalism is treason.” In
other words, it is treason to think that France is French. Patriotism, Macron
said, is inclusion of Africa, the Middle East, and Asia into France. The way
for the French to gain sovereignty is to surrender their sovereignty to the EU
in Belgium and give up all control, not that any currently exists, over foreign
affairs, migration, and budgetary and fiscal policy.
Merkel and Macron speak of the
submission of Germany and France to the New World Order, but they do not say
what they understand the New World Order to be. Their words indicate that one
of its features is the replacement of the German and French populations and
cultures with those of the Third World, as in The Camp of the Saints.
In the US the New World Order
means US hegemony over the world. The neoconservatives, who have controlled US
foreign policy since the Clinton regime, believe that the US is “the
indispensable nation” with the right and the responsibility to impose its ways
on the world.
The globalist corporations
understand the New World Order to be their immunity to laws of sovereign
countries.
Others see the New World Order to
be a Rothschild or other Jewish conspiracy to control the world economy and
bleed it for their profits.
With so many different meanings,
it is difficult to see which conspiracy against national existence is the
threat. Or is it all of them?
Nevertheless, in the Western
world, nationalism, the traditional basis of patriotism, now means, thanks to
Identity Politics, “white supremacy.” According to Identity Politics, the
ruling ideology in the US, white people must be disempowered and subjected to
punishments for the assortment of crimes attributed to them.
Therefore, the views in the US,
France, and Germany come to the same conclusion: white people are guilty and
must give up their country to others. Any protests of this outlandish
requirement is proof that whites should be strung up, and they likely will be
with the support of their own governments. Do we see the first signs of it
here? Will this:
and this:
and this:
lead to this:
Sources:
/https://www.niagarafallsreview.ca/content/dam/thestar/news/canada/2021/09/25/huawei-executive-meng-wanzhou-receives-warm-welcome-upon-return-to-china/_1_meng_wanzhou_2.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.