DA MAIOR IMPORTÂNCIA -- THIERRY MEYSSAN -- CARTA ABERTA AO PRESIDENTE TRUMP SOBRE AS CONSEQUÊNCIAS DO 11 DE SETEMBRO

CARTA ABERTA AO PRESIDENTE TRUMP SOBRE AS CONSEQUÊNCIAS DO 11 DE SETEMBRO

por Thierry Meyssan

REDE VOLTAIRE | DAMASCO (SÍRIA) | 30 DE AGOSTO DE 2018

ENGLISH FRANÇAIS ESPAÑOL  

Senhor Presidente,

Os crimes do 11 de Setembro de 2001 nunca foram julgados no seu país. Estou a escrever-lhe, na qualidade de cidadão francês, o primeiro que denunciou as incoerências da versão oficial e abriu o debate mundial sobre a investigação dos verdadeiros culpados.

Quando somos jurados de um tribunal criminal, devemos determinar se o suspeito que nos é apresentado, é culpado ou não, e, em caso afirmativo, que sentença lhe deve ser aplicada. Quando testemunhamos os acontecimentos do 11 de Setembro, a Administração Bush Jr. afirmou que o culpado era a Al-Qaeda e que o castigo seria a derrubada daqueles que a ajudaram: os Taliban afegãos, depois o regime iraquiano de Saddam Hussein.

No entanto, muitas pistas atestam a impossibilidade desta tese. Se fôssemos jurados, declararíamos objectivamente, os Taliban afegãos e o regime de Saddam Hussein inocentes deste crime. É claro que não saberíamos quem é o verdadeiro culpado e isso frustrar-nos-ia. Mas não concebemos condenar pessoas inocentes por esse crime, porque não soubemos ou não pudemos, encontrar os culpados.

Todos nós compreendíamos que altas personalidades estavam a mentir, quando o Secretário da Justiça e o Director do FBI, Robert Mueller, revelaram os nomes dos 19 presumíveis piratas do ar. Pois já tínhamos diante de nós, as listas divulgadas pelas companhias de aviação da totalidade dos passageiros embarcados; listas em que nenhum desses suspeitos figurava.

A partir daí, ficamos desconfiados do “governo de Continuidade”, o poder encarregado de substituir as autoridades eleitas, caso elas morram durante um confronto nuclear. Aventamos a hipótese de que esses ataques mascaravam um golpe de Estado, em conformidade com o método que Edward Luttwak tinha imaginado: manter a aparência do Executivo, mas impondo uma política diferente.

 Nos dias a seguir ao 11 de Setembro, a Administação Bush tomou várias decisões:

Ø  A criação do Departamento de Segurança Interna/Office of Homeland Security e o voto para um volumoso Código anti-terrorista elaborado com bastante antecedência, o USA Patriot Act. Para os assuntos que a administração designa como "terroristas", este texto suspende a Bill of Rights/ Declaração de Direitos que fez a glória do seu país. Desequilibra as vossas instituições. Assegura, dois séculos mais tarde, o triunfo dos grandes proprietários que elaboraram a Constituição e a derrota dos heróis da Guerra da Independência, que exigiram que lhe incluíssem a Bill of Rights.

Ø O Secretário da Defesa, Donald Rumsfeld, criou o Office of Force Transformation, sob o comando do almirante Arthur Cebrowski. Ele apresentou imediatamente um plano, concebido de longa data, prevendo controlar o acesso aos recursos naturais dos países do sul. Exigia destruir estruturas estatais e vida social em metade do mundo ainda não globalizado. Simultaneamente, o Director da CIA lançou a "Matriz do Ataque Global", um conjunto de operações secretas em 85 países, onde Rumsfeld e Cebrowski pretendiam destruir as estruturas do Estado. Considerando que apenas os países cujas economias estavam globalizadas, seriam estáveis e que os outros seriam destruídos, os homens do 11 de Setembro colocaram as Forças Armadas USA ao serviço de interesses financeiros transnacionais. Eles traíram o seu país e fizeram dele o braço armado desses predadores.

Nos últimos 17 anos, vimos o que dá aos seus concidadãos, o governo dos sucessores daqueles que redigiram a Constitution e que se opuseram, sem êxito, nessa altura, à Bill of Rights : os ricos tornaram-se super-ricos, enquanto a classe média foi reduzida a um quinto e a pobreza aumentou.

Também vemos a implementação da estratégia Rumsfeld-Cebrowski: as denominadas “guerras civis” devastaram a maior parte do Médio Oriente Alargado. Cidades inteiras foram varridas do mapa desde o Afeganistão até à Líbia, passando pela Arábia Saudita e pela Turquia, que, todavia, não estavam em guerra.

Em 2001, só dois cicadãos dos  Estados Unidos da América denunciaram as incoerências da versão Bush, dois promotores imobiliários: o democrata Jimmy Walter, que foi forçado a exilar-se, e o Senhor, que, em breve entrou na política e foi eleito presidente.

Em 2011, vimos o comandante da AFRICOM ser dispensado da sua missão, em benefício da NATO, por se recusar a apoiar a Al-Qaeda a fim de derrubar a Jamahiriya Árabe Líbia. Depois, vimos a LANDCOM da NATO, organizar o apoio ocidental aos jihadistas em geral e à Al-Qaeda em particular, para derrubar a República Árabe Síria.

Assim, os jihadistas, considerados os “combatentes da liberdade” contra os soviéticos,  depois como “terroristas” no 11 de Setembro, tornando-se nos aliados do Estado Profundo (Deep State) que eles nunca deixaram de ser.

Também temos assistido, com imensa esperança, à sua acção para suprimir, um a um, todo o apoio aos jihadistas. É com a mesma esperança que o vemos hoje dialogar com o seu colega russo a fim de restaurar a vida no devastado Médio Oriente Alargado. E é com uma preocupação equivalente que vemos Robert Mueller, que se tornou Procurador especial, continuar a destruição da sua pátria, ao atacar a sua posição.

Senhor Presidente, não só o Senhor e os seus compatriotas sofrem com a diarquia estabelecida no seu país desde o golpe de 11 de Setembro, mas o mundo inteiro é uma vítima dessa mesma diarquia.

Senhor Presidente, o 11 de Setembro não é uma história antiga. É o triunfo dos interesses transnacionais que hoje esmagam não só o seu povo, mas toda a Humanidade que aspira à liberdade. 

Thierry Meyssan

Thierry Meyssan abriu o debate mundial sobre os verdadeiros responsáveis pelo 11 de Setembro. Trabalhou como analista político ao lado de Hugo Chavez, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad e Mouamar Kadhafi. Presentemente, é um refugiado político na Síria.

 Fonte: 

http://www.voltairenet.org/article202612.html

OF THE UTMOST IMPORTANCE --Thierry Meyssan -- Open letter to President Trump concerning the consequences of 11 September 2001

Open letter to President Trump concerning the consequences of 11 September 2001

by Thierry Meyssan

VOLTAIRE NETWORK | DAMASCUS (SYRIA) | 30 August 2018 

FRANÇAIS  ESPAÑOL 

Mister President,

The crimes of 11 September 2001 have never been judged in your country. I am writing to you as a French citizen, the first person to denounce the inconsistencies of the official version and to open the world to the debate and the search for the real perpetrators.

In a criminal court, as the jury, we have to determine whether the suspect presented to us is guilty or not, and eventually, to decide what punishment he should receive. When we suffered the events of 9/11, the Bush Junior administration told us that the guilty party was Al-Qaïda, and the punishment they should receive was the overthrow of those who had helped them – the Afghan Taliban, then the Iraqi régime of Saddam Hussein.

However, there is a weight of evidence which attests to the impossibility of this thesis. If we were members of a jury, we would have to declare objectively that the Taliban and the régime of Saddam Hussein were innocent of this crime. Of course, this alone would not enable us to name the real culprits, and we would thus be frustrated. But we could not conceive of condemning parties innocent of such a crime simply because we have not known how, or not been able, to find the guilty parties.

We all understood that certain senior personalities were lying when the Secretary of State for Justice and Director of the FBI, Robert Mueller, revealed the names of the 19 presumed hijackers, because we already had in front of us the lists disclosed by the airline companies of all of the passengers embarked - lists on which none of the suspects were mentioned.

From there, we became suspicious of the « Continuity of Government », the instance tasked with taking over from the elected authorities if they should be killed during a nuclear confrontation. We advanced the hypothesis that these attacks masked a coup d’état, in conformity with Edward Luttwak’s method of maintaining the appearance of the Executive, but imposing a different policy.

In the days following 9/11, the Bush administration made several decisions:

 the creation of the Office of Homeland Security and the vote for a voluminous anti-terrorist Code which had been drawn up long beforehand, the USA Patriot Act. For affairs which the administration itself qualifies as « terrorist », this text suspends the Bill of Rights which was the glory of your country. It unbalances your institutions. Two centuries later, it validates the triumph of the great landowners who wrote the Constitution and the defeat of the heroes of the War of Independence who demanded that the Bill of Rights must be added.

 The Secretary for Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, created the Office of Force Transformation, under the command of Admiral Arthur Cebrowski, who immediately presented a programme, conceived a long time earlier, planning for the control of access to the natural resources of the countries of the South. He demanded the destruction of State and social structures in the half of the world which was not yet globalized. Simultaneously, the Director of the CIA launched the « Worldwide Attack Matrix », a package of secret operations in 85 countries where Rumsfeld and Cebrowski intended to destroy the State structures. Considering that only those countries whose economies were globalized would remain stable and that the others would be destroyed, the men from 9/11 placed US armed forces in the service of transnational financial interests. They betrayed your country and transformed it into the armed wing of these predators.

For the last 17 years, we have witnessed what is being given to your compatriots by the government of the successors of those who drew up the Constitution and opposed at that time - without success – the Bill of Rights. These rich men have become the super-rich, while the middle class has been reduced by a fifth and poverty has increased.

We have also seen the implementation of the Rumsfeld-Cebrowski strategy – phony « civil wars » have devastated almost all of the Greater Middle East. Entire cities have been wiped from the map, from Afghanistan to Libya, via Saudi Arabia and Turkey, who were not themselves at war.

In 2001, only two US citizens denounced the incoherence of the Bush version, two real estate promoters – the Democrat Jimmy Walter, who was forced into exile, and yourself, who entered into politics and was elected President.

In 2011, we saw the commander of AFRICOM relieved of his mission and replaced by NATO for having refused to support Al-Qaïda in the liquidation of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. Then we saw NATO’s Landcom organize Western support for jihadists in general and Al-Qaïda in particular in their attempt to overthrow the Syrian Arab Republic.

So the jihadists, who were considered as « freedom fighters » against the Soviets, then as « terrorists » after 9/11, once again became the allies of the deep state, which, in fact, they have always been.

So, with an immense upsurge of hope, we have watched your actions to suppress, one by one, all support for the jihadists. It is with the same hope that we see today that you are talking with your Russian counterpart in order to bring back life to the devastated Middle East. And it is with equal anxiety that we see Robert Mueller, now a special prosecutor, pursuing the destruction of your homeland by attacking your position.

Mister President, not only are you and your compatriots suffering from the diarchy which has sneaked into power in your country since the coup d’état of 11 September 2001, but the whole world is a victim.

Mister President, 9/11 is not ancient history. It is the triumph of transnational interests which are crushing not only your people but all of humanity which aspires to freedom.

Thierry Meyssan brought to the world stage the debate on the real perpetrators of 11 September 2001. He has worked as a political analyst alongside Hugo Chavez, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Mouamar Kadhafi. He is today a political refugee in Syria.

Thierry Meyssan

DE LA MAYOR IMPORTANCIA -- Thierry Meyssan -- Carta abierta al presidente Trump sobre las consecuencias del 11 de Septiembre

Carta abierta al presidente Trump sobre las consecuencias del 11 de Septiembre

por Thierry Meyssan

RED VOLTAIRE | DAMASCO (SIRIA) | 30 DE AGOSTO DE 2018 

FRANÇAIS  ENGLISH 

Señor Presidente,

En su país nunca hubo juicios por los crímenes del 11 de Septiembre de 2001. Dirijo a usted esta carta como el ciudadano francés que primero denunció las incoherencias de la versión oficial y que abrió mundialmente el debate sobre la búsqueda de los culpables.

Cuando somos llamados a hacer el papel de jurado en un tribunal penal, estamos llamados a determinar si el sospechoso que nos presentan es culpable o no y, posiblemente, a decidir la pena que debe aplicársele. Ante los acontecimientos del 11 de Septiembre, la administración de George Bush hijo nos dijo que el culpable era al-Qaeda y que el castigo sería el derrocamiento de todos los que habían ayudado a al-Qaeda, o sea los talibanes afganos y, después, el régimen iraquí de Saddam Hussein.

Pero existen numerosos indicios que desmienten esa tesis de manera irrefutable. Si fuésemos jurados, tendríamos que declarar objetivamente a los talibanes y al régimen de Saddam Hussein inocentes, al menos de ese crimen. Por supuesto, no por ello sabríamos quién es el verdadero culpable y eso nos sumiría en un sentimiento de frustración. Pero no podemos aceptar que se condene a quienes no cometieron ese crimen, sólo porque nosotros no hemos sabido, o podido, encontrar a los verdaderos culpables.

Todos hemos entendido ya que altas personalidades estaban mintiendo cuando el secretario de Justicia y el director del FBI, Robert Muller, publicaron los nombres de los 19 supuestos participantes en los secuestros de los aviones implicados en los hechos del 11 de Septiembre. Y lo supimos porque ya teníamos las listas de todos los pasajeros de los aviones, divulgadas por las compañías aéreas, y ninguno de aquellos sospechosos aparecía en dichas listas.

Basándonos en esos elementos sospechamos del «Gobierno de Continuidad», instancia encargada de tomar el lugar de los responsables electos si estos muriesen en una confrontación nuclear. Emitimos entonces la hipótesis de que tras aquellos atentados se escondía un golpe de Estado, planificado según el método concebido por Edward Luttwak, consistente en mantener, en apariencia, el ejecutivo que ya estaba en el poder, pero obligándolo a aplicar una política diferente.

Inmediatamente después de los acontecimientos del 11 de Septiembre, la administración de Bush hijo adoptó, en cuestión de días, varias decisiones:
 Creó el Departamento de Seguridad de la Patria (Homeland Security) e hizo votar en el Congreso un voluminoso código antiterrorista –redactado mucho antes de los atentados–, la llamada Ley o Acta Patriótica (USA Patriot Act). Redactado para los casos que la administración pueda decidir calificar como «terrorismo», ese texto suspende la Carta de Derechos (Bill of Rights) en la que se sustentó la gloria de su país. La “Ley Patriótica” desequilibra las instituciones estadounidenses y garantiza, dos siglos más tarde, el triunfo de los grandes propietarios que redactaron la Constitución y la derrota de los héroes de la Guerra de Independencia que exigieron que se agregara a aquella Constitución la Carta de Derechos.
 El secretario de Defensa Donald Rumsfeld creó la «Oficina de Transformación de la Fuerza» (Office of Force Transformation), bajo la dirección del almirante Arthur Cebrowski, quien de inmediato presentó un plan –concebido desde mucho antes– para controlar el acceso a los recursos naturales de los países del sur. Ese plan exigía la destrucción de las estructuras mismas de los Estados y sociedades en los países de la mitad del mundo aún no globalizada. Simultáneamente, el director de la CIA inició la «Matriz del Ataque Mundial», un conjunto de operaciones secretas en 85 países cuyos Estados y sociedades Rumsfeld y Cebrowski querían destruir. Estimando que sólo se mantendrían estables los países cuyas economías estaban globalizadas, y que los otros serían destruidos, los verdaderos organizadores del 11 de Septiembre pusieron las fuerzas armadas de Estados Unidos al servicio de intereses financieros transnacionales. Traicionaron así a Estados Unidos y lo convirtieron en el brazo armados de los depredadores.

Hace 17 años que estamos viendo las consecuencias que ha tenido para los conciudadanos de usted, Presidente, el gobierno de los sucesores de aquellos que redactaron la Constitución y se opusieron en su época –sin éxito– a la «Carta de Derechos». Esas consecuencias son que los ricos se han convertido en súper ricos mientras que la clase media se ha reducido a la quinta parte de lo que fue y la pobreza se ha extendido.

Vemos también la aplicación de la estrategia Rumsfeld-Cebrowski: supuestas «guerras civiles» han destruido casi todo el Medio Oriente ampliado. Desde Afganistán hasta Libia, pasando por Arabia Saudita y Turquía –dos países que ni siquiera han estado en guerra–, ciudades enteras han sido borradas del mapa.

En 2001, sólo dos ciudadanos estadounidenses, dos promotores inmobiliarios, denunciaron las incoherencias de la versión de la administración Bush Jr. Fueron el demócrata Jimmy Walter, quien acabó viéndose obligado a exilarse, y usted mismo. Usted entró entonces al mundo de la política y acabó siendo electo presidente.

En 2011, vimos como el entonces comandante del AfriCom era separado de su cargo –en beneficio de la OTAN– por haberse negado a respaldar a al-Qaeda en su papel de fuerza terrestre que debía destruir la Yamahiriya Árabe Libia. Vimos después como el LandCom de la OTAN organizaba el apoyo de Occidente a los yihadistas en general y a al-Qaeda en particular en el intento de derrocamiento emprendido contra la República Árabe Siria.

O sea, los yihadistas, considerados «combatientes de la libertad» (Freedom fighters) cuando combatían a los soviéticos, considerados después «terroristas» en tiempos del 11 de Septiembre, se convertían nuevamente en los aliados del Estado Profundo que en realidad nunca dejaron de ser.

Vimos con inmensa esperanza los pasos que dio usted para suprimir uno a uno todos los apoyos que tenían los yihadistas. Con esa misma esperanza inmensa le vemos hoy a usted dialogar con su homólogo ruso para que vuelva la vida al devastado Medio Oriente. Y es con el mismo grado de inquietud que vemos a Robert Muller, hoy convertido en fiscal especial, proseguir la destrucción de su patria arremetiendo contra la función presidencial que usted ejerce.

Señor Presidente, no son usted y sus conciudadanos los únicos que sufren a causa de la diarquía que se ha instalado en Estados Unidos desde el golpe de Estado del 11 de Septiembre. El mundo entero es víctima.

Señor Presidente, el 11 de Septiembre no es historia antigua. El 11 de Septiembre fue el triunfo de intereses transnacionales cuyo peso se abate hoy no sólo sobre el pueblo estadounidense sino sobre toda la Humanidad que aspira a la libertad.

Thierry Meyssan inició mundialmente el debate sobre quiénes son los verdaderos responsables de los acontecimientos del 11 de Septiembre de 2001. Ha trabajado como analista político junto a Hugo Chávez, Mahmud Ahmadineyad y Muammar el-Kadhafi. Es actualmente refugiado político en Siria.

Thierry Meyssan

EN -- Manlio Dinucci -- «THE ART OF WAR» -- Bridges collapsed and bridges bombed

With all bridges destroyed, Novi Sad residents were forced to cross the Danube with an army pontoon ferry. More photos available HERE

« THE ART OF WAR »

Bridges collapsed and bridges bombed

by Manlio Dinucci

« The image is truly apocalyptic. It looks as though a bomb has fallen on this stretch of road, which is a major artery » - that is how a journalist described the Morandi bridge in Genoa just after it had collapsed, destroying the lives of dozens of people [1].

These words bring to mind other images, those of about 40 Serbian bridges destroyed by NATO bombing in 1999 - among these the bridge over the Morava in Southern Serbia, where two missiles hit a train and massacred the passengers. For 78 days, taking off mostly from   Italian bases supplied by the D’Alema government, 1,100 planes made 38,000 sorties, launching 23,000 bombs and missiles. They systematically destroyed Serbian structures and infrastructures, causing thousands of civilian victims. 54 Italian planes participated in the attacks, making 1,378 sorties and attacking objectives indicated by the US command. « Taking into account the number of planes involved, we were second only to the United States. Italy is a major country, and there should be no surprise at the engagement we are showing in this war », declared D’Alema.

In the same year that it took part in the final demolition of the Yugoslavian State, the D’Alema government dismantled the public property of the Società Autostrade (also manager of the Morandi bridge), by handing over a part of it to a group of shareholders, and listing the rest on the Stock Exchange. The Morandi bridge collapsed fundamentally under the responsibility of a system centered on profit, the same system which is at the heart of the powerful interests represented by NATO.

The comparison between the images of the collapsed Morandi bridge and the bombed Serbian bridges, which may at first seem forced, is on the contrary well-founded.

First of all, the terrible scene of victims buried under the rubble by the collapse should make us reflect on the horrible reality of war, which the major media present to us as a sort of  'war game', with the pilot taking aim at the bridge and the remote-controlled bomb blowing it to pieces.

Secondly, we should remember that on 28 March, the European Commission presented a plan of action which anticipates the repair and maintenance of EU structures, including the bridges, but not in order to make them safer for civilian mobility, but more efficient for military mobility [2].

In reality, this plan was decided by the Pentagon and by NATO, who demanded that the EU  « improve civilian infrastructures so that they will be better adapted to military requirements » - in other words, to be able to displace tanks, self-propelled cannons and other heavy military vehicles as quickly as possible from one European country to another, in order to move against « Russian aggression ». For example – if a bridge is not able to support the weight of a column of tanks, it will have to be reinforced or rebuilt.

We might believe that in this case, if the bridge is strengthened, it will therefore also become safer for civilian vehicles. But the question is not so simple.

These modifications will only be made for military mobility on the most important land arteries, and the enormous expenditure will be assumed by each country, which will be obliged to subtract the cost from its resources for the general improvement of its infrastructures.

A financial contribution by the EU is planned for a sum of 6,5 billion Euros, but - as specified by Federica Mogherini, responsible for the « security policy » of the EU – only in order to « ensure that infrastructures of strategic importance are adapted to military requirements ».

But time flies – by September, the European Council will have to specify (on orders from NATO) the list of the infrastructures which must be potentialized for military mobility. Will the Morandi bridge be listed and rebuilt so that US and NATO tanks can safely transit over the heads of the people of Genoa?

[1] The Morandi bridge, an important motorway viaduct in Genoa, managed by a private company, collapsed on 14 August, causing more than 40 victims. The probable cause is a structural collapse, the signs of which were nonetheless ignored for years. (Editor's note).

[2] “The Militarization of the European Union: Schengen Area Handed Over to US-NATO Forces”, by Manlio Dinucci, Il Manifesto (Italy), Voltaire Network, 7 April 2018.

il manifesto, August 28, 2018

Translator: Pete Kimberley

NO WAR NO NATO

SIGN THIS PETITION

https://www.pandoratv.it/category/opinioni/manlio-dinucci-opinioni/

SP -- Manlio Dinucci -- «EL ARTE DE LA GUERRA» -- Puentes que se derrumban y puentes bombardeados

«EL ARTE DE LA GUERRA»

Puentes que se derrumban y puentes bombardeados

por Manlio Dinucci

Todos vimos con horror el derrumbe del puente Morandi en Génova. Desde Roma, Manlio Dinucci nos recuerda que la empresa que se ocupaba de ese puente fue privatizada… para pagar los bombardeos italianos que destruían puentes en Serbia. Eso sucedió en 1999, por orden de la OTAN.

RED VOLTAIRE | ROMA (ITALIA) | 29 DE AGOSTO DE 2018 

FRANÇAIS  ITALIANO  TÜRKÇE  PORTUGUÊS  ENGLISH 

«La imagen es verdaderamente apocalíptica. Como si hubiera caído una bomba en esa importantísima arteria.» Así describía un periodista la catástrofe del puente Morandi, que acababa de derrumbarse en Génova, segando las vidas de varias decenas de personas [1].

Esa descripción trae a la mente otras imágenes, las de unos 40 puentes destruidos en Serbia por los bombardeos de la OTAN, en 1999. Entre ellos estaba el puente sobre el río conocido como Morava del Sur. Dos misiles alcanzaron un tren que cruzaba aquel puente, destruyéndolo y provocando una verdadera masacre. Durante 78 días, 1 100 aviones efectuaron 38 000 bombardeos aéreos, utilizando contra Serbia 23 000 bombas y misiles y despegando principalmente de las bases italianas que el gobierno del entonces primer ministro Massimo D’Alema puso a la disposición de la OTAN.

TR -- Manlio Dinucci -- Çöken köprüler ve bombalanan köprüler

Çöken köprüler ve bombalanan köprüler

yazan Manlio Dinucci

Cenova’daki Morandi Köprüsünün yıkılması karşısında dehşete düştüğümüz bir sırada Manlio Dinucci bize bu yapıyı gerçekleştiren şirketin, İtalyan Ordusu tarafından Sırbistan’da yıkılan köprülerin bedelini ödemek için özelleştirildiğini anımsatıyor. Bu olay 1999 yılında NATO’nun emriyle gerçekleştirildi.

VOLTAİRE İLETİŞİM AĞI | ŞAM (SURİYE) | 29 AĞUSTOS 2018 

FRANÇAİS  İTALİANO  PORTUGUÊS  ESPAÑOL  ENGLİSH 

« Görüntü felaketti, bu çok önemli anayolun üzerine bir bomba düşmüş gibiydi »: Onlarca kişinin ölümüne neden olan Cenova’da yıkılan Morandi Köprüsünü bir gazeteci bu şekilde tanımlıyordu [1].

Bu sözcükler başka görüntüleri, NATO bombardımanlarıyla yıkılan, aralarında iki füzenin üzerinden geçen treni vurarak yolcularını katlettiği Morava’nın güney kesiminde yer alan köprünün de yer aldığı yaklaşık 40 Sırp köprüsünün görüntülerini akla getiriyor. Alema Hükümeti tarafından sağlanan İtalyan üslerinden havalanan 1 100 uçak 78 gün boyunca 38 000 sorti gerçekleştirerek 23 000 adet bomba ve füze bıraktılar. Sırbistan’ın yapı ve altyapılarını sistematik bir şekilde imha ettiler ve binlerce sivilin yaşamını yitirmesine yol açtılar. Bombardımanlara 1 378 sorti gerçekleştiren ve ABD’li komutanlığın belirlediği hedeflere saldıran 54 İtalyan uçağı katıldı. Alema, « uçak sayısı olarak, ABD’den sonra ikinci ülke olduk. İtalya büyük bir ülkedir ve bu savaşta gösterdiğimiz kararlılık karşısında kimse şaşırmamalıdır » diye açıklamada bulundu.

Dmitry Orlov’s Tribute to John McCain

Dmitry Orlov’s Tribute to John McCain

August 28, 2018 

Dmitry Orlov’s Tribute to John McCain

https://cluborlov.blogspot.com/2018/08/a-senator-masquerading-as-gas-station.html

A Senator Masquerading as a Gas Station

John McCain is dead, and many people are celebrating whereas they should be sad. He wasn’t a friend of mankind—he was its enemy, but a really bad one. But with such grossly incompetent enemies—who needs friends?

McCain did a great deal to destroy America. He devoted his entire lifetime to American destruction. To start with, he was quite effective as a protester against America’s genocidal war on the people of Vietnam. Other Americans just marched around ineffectually, waving banners and shouting antiwar slogans, but not McCain! His own father had a lot to do with starting that war, but McCain made up for that by destroying 26 American warplanes. That’s quite something! If every American flyer crashed as many planes, countless innocent lives would have been saved.

Of course, he could have done even better—and he did try. He almost managed to destroy the US aircraft carrier Forrestal by setting it ablaze. To top off his illustrious military career, he surrendered to the enemy and spent five years in a Vietnamese prison. This made him a hero—in Americans’ eyes only, while the rest of the world saw in him a murderer of Vietnamese children.

His “martyrdom” as a POW helped pave his way to a political career, first in Congress, then in the Senate. During his obscenely long career in national politics, McCain did what he could to make American “democracy” look like a complete joke and to hasten America’s collapse. This, by the way, wasn’t a tall order: American “democracy” had long been a cesspool—a playground for lobbyists and political technologists based on a fully gerrymandered system of fake elections. But he did his thing and is, therefore, twice the hero.

Defecating into the cesspool of American politics doesn’t alter its chemistry much, but McCain pushed the limits here as well. If only he and the native genius that is Sara Palin had won the Presidency! This surely would have hastened American collapse by quite a substantial amount, bringing his life’s work to fruition. This was perhaps his greatest failing: he turned out to be a traitor to his own friends and a faithful servant to his political enemies. He shut down his electoral campaign two weeks before the election. Then he did whatever he could to kiss up to Obama and helped wreck the repeal of Obamacare. McCain deserves to have a gigantic sausage-shaped obelisk erected in his honor, made of the same lumpy, brown material that he was so full of throughout his political career.

Internationally, McCain was a stellar performer when it came to meddling in the affairs of other nations, often in ways that helped undermine America’s standing in the world. Whenever he visited a foreign country, the likelihood of civil war breaking out there went up by a notch, sometimes by two. He always had a warm place in his heart for terrorists—be they Ukrainian neo-Nazis or the homicidal maniacs of the Islamic Caliphate (a.k.a. ISIS). He managed to perform in spite of not being very smart: in 2013 he published an article on the website Pravda.ru, thinking that it was Russia’s main newspaper (which was at that point two decades defunct).

He was one of the prime architects of the Ukrainian government’s “anti-terrorist operation” against its own citizens in the east of the country. His actions helped assure American defeat and Syrian victory in Syria and set the Ukrainian government he had helped install in 2014 on a course for self-destruction. Russia owes him a debt of gratitude for its reunification with Crimea after its two lost decades in the Ukrainian wilderness. He was also a champion of America’s own self-destruction through national bankruptcy, always being in favor of its profligate, fantastically corrupt and otherwise ineffectual defense spending.

His crowning achievement was his successful push for anti-Russian sanctions. They made it very difficult for Russian government officials to appear serious and resist the urge to say “May we have some more sanctions, please?” Thanks to these sanctions, Russia has moved rapidly toward achieving food security and has become one of the world’s major agricultural exporters; it has achieved or will soon achieve complete self-sufficiency in defense and in many other industrial sectors; and it is quite far along in making itself independent of the US dollar and of Western finance.

The effect of the sanctions in simultaneously driving down both the ruble and the Russian stock market has allowed the Russian government to sell dollars high and to buy up Russian industrial stocks low, effectively re-nationalizing Russian industry at bargain-basement prices, shifting the share of its government ownership from around 16% to at least 65% while squeezing out Western financial interests. The profits that would have otherwise been pocketed by Western investors are now flooding into the Russian treasury, to be spent on health, education, housing, roads and bridges and so on. McCain, you socialist you!

McCain also had a wonderful talent for being not just wrong but exactly wrong, as in the exact opposite of right. He called Russia “a gas station masquerading as a country.” That was great for Russia because Russia was at the time a country masquerading as a gas station, to buy itself the time it needed to rebuild and rearm. Now that it has done so, the mask can come off, and Russia is most grateful to McCain for having given it plenty of cover just at the time when it most needed it.

It is a sad moment now that McCain’s untimely demise has sent him off to an eternity in Hell because he didn’t get to finish his life’s work: destroying the United States. Nevertheless, we should call it a job well done, for the course on which he helped set the country is now unalterable. Even if he is replaced in his Senate seat by someone actually competent and able to act in his nation’s interest, this won’t alter its course by much, and certainly will not reverse it. Let us now observe a minute of silence in honor of John McCain, for upon his passing the American Collapse Party has lost a true leader.

More from Guest Contributions ↓

A MUST -- According to the New York Times, Putin Rules America

According to the New York Times Putin Rules America

August 28, 2018 

According to the New York Times,  Putin Rules America

President Trump is only his handyman

Paul Craig Roberts

When I first read this — https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/24/us/politics/cia-russia-midterm-elections.html — I thought it was a caricature of fake news. Then I realized it was a New York Times article, and being fairly certain that the arrogant presstitute organization was not taking the piss out of itself, as it is one of the main purveyors of fake news, I found the conclusion unavoidable that Julian E. Barnes and Matthew Rosenberg were so tightly bound inside The Matrix that they might actually believe the nonsense that they wrote.

Here is an overview of the fantasy that the two presstitutes have penned in the New York Times:

US intelligence (sic) had “informants close to President Vladimir V. Putin and in the Kremlin” who provided “urgent and explicit warnings about Russia’s intentions to try to tip the [2016] American presidential election.” The NYT presstitutes do not say why nothing was done by US intelligence which had inside information from the Kremlin itself that Putin was about to steal for Trump the US election. Certainly, CIA Director Brennan and FBI Director Comey, both of whom are Hillary’s allies, would not have approved of Putin stealing the election for Trump. But there is no criticism from the NY Times’ presstitutes for this massive intelligence failure to act to prevent Putin from stealing the election from Hillary. Brennan and Comey sat on their hands and permitted Putin to steal the election for Trump. So, who is really guilty of “Russiagate?”

Obviously, this NY Times article is a hoax written by imbeciles. The claim that the Putin/Trump conspiracy was leaked to US intelligence from inside the Kremlin is an invention to help to provide a background history in an effort to boost the credibility of the Russiagate orchestration that is directed against President Trump. The presstitutes in their effort to boost Russiagate’s credibility inadvertently portrayed US intelligence as negligent in its duty.

Barnes and Rosenberg say that Putin is continuing with his dirty tricks, but the Russian traitors inside the Kremlin within Putin’s close circles “have gone silent,” depriving us of information about how the Russians are going to steal the midterm elections. The presstitutes suggest that Washington’s informers inside Putin’s government have “gone to ground” to avoid being murdered “like the poisoning in March in Britain of a former Russian intelligence officer that utilized a rare Russian-made nerve agent.”

It is difficult to know what to make of presstitutes like Barnes and Rosenberg and the NYTimes who refuse to acknowledge the fact that there has been zero evidence produced that supports the alleged attack on the Skirpals, both of whom survived a “deadly nerve agent.” There is no evidence whatsoever that the alleged deadly nerve agent was made in Russia, and there is no explanation why the deadly nerve agent was not deadly. The only possible conclusion from the total absence of any evidence is that no such attack occurred. It is just another propaganda hoax against Russia.

More proof that there was no such attack is provided by the refusal of the British government to share its investigation, if there actually was an investigation, with anyone, not even with the accused Russians. Accusations without a shred of evidence are not a good basis for a trusting relationship with a nuclear power.

Barnes and Rosenberg suggest that the House Intelligence Committee, encouraged by President Trump, chilled intelligence collection by “outing an FBI informant,” leaving Washington in the dark about Putin’s precise intentions.

No, this is not a conspiracy story from the National Inquirer, now a more reliable newspaper than the New York Times. This utter nonsense is published in the New York Times, “the newspaper of record.” What false record historians are going to have.

What are the NYTimes’ sources for this fantasy? The presstitute organization cannot tell us. “American intelligence agencies have not been able to say precisely what are Mr. Putin’s intentions: He could be trying to tilt the midterm elections, simply sow chaos or generally undermine trust in the democratic process.” But the NYTimes knows that Putin is up to something, because “senior intelligence officials, including Dan Coats, the director of national intelligence, have warned that Russians are intent on subverting American democratic institutions.”

So here we have Trump’s own appointment, Dan Coats, undermining Trump’s effort to normalize relations with Russia. Who among Trump’s advisors advised him to appoint a Russia-phobic moron like Dan Coats? If Trump had any sense, he would fire both of them.

Washington routinely subverts democratic institutions in other countries, such as Honduras, Nicaguara, Venezuela, Iran, Ukraine, Indonesia. Read Stephen Kinser’s The Brothers for a number of examples: https://www.amazon.com/Brothers-Foster-Dulles-Allen-Secret/dp/1250053129/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1535400838&sr=1-1&keywords=The+Brothers

Washington finances opposition candidates who are bought and paid for by Washington and uses various non-governmental organizations (NGOs) financed by the National Endowment for Democracy, George Soros, the International Republican Institute, and many other front groups for subversion of countries “uncooperative with Washington” in order to install a Washington puppet. Washington even has NGOs operating in Russia where they are even permitted by the Russian government to own newspapers. All anti-Putin protests are organized by Washington using the NGOs that Washington funds.

Russia, however, has no NGOs operating in the US, and, unlike Israel, does not own the US Congress and White House. So how exactly, Director of National Intelligence (sic) Dan Coats, are the Russians going to subvert “American democratic institutions?”

Don’t expect an answer.

Try to understand the insults to Trump voters of the charge that they are puppets at the end of Putin’s string: Trump voters are portrayed as morons who are not capable of thinking for themselves. If they were, they would have voted for Hillary so that America could demonstrate its escape from misogyny and male domination by electing its First Woman President on the heels of the First Half-Black President. Instead, the minds of American voters were warped by Putin. The $100,000 dollars spent by a Russian Internet company trying to attract advertisers prevailed over the multi-billion dollars spent by the Democrats and Republicans and by American economic interests focused on capturing the government for their agendas. The Russian plot is so powerful that a dollar spent by Russia is thousands of times more powerful than a dollar spent by Wall Street, the military/security complex, George Soros, Sheldon Adelson, etc., and so on.

In the official story, no American voted for Trump because his/her job was sent to Asia or Mexico by global US corporations pursuing high monetary rewards for executives and shareholders at the expense of the American workforce. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/aug/28/att-earns-record-profits-layoffs-outsourcing-continue The “Trump Deplorables” voted for Trump because they were brainwashed by a few Russian Internet ads directed at maximizing clicks in order to attract advertisers.

No one voted for Trump because their son and daughter, on whose education the family used up its savings, acquired student loan debts and possibly a second mortgage, can only find a job as a waitress and bartender because the jobs for which they prepared at great expense are handed over to lowly paid foreigners in order that shareholders can receive large capital gains and a handful of corporate executives can receive multimillion dollar bonuses for raising profits by closing down America’s vaunted “opportunity society. Today Americans have debts and no opportunities.

Assuming you have some sense and some ability to think independently of the lies that are fed to you daily, can you possibly believe that Americans voted for Trump because Putin tricked them with Internet ads that are unlikely to have been seen by as many as one percent of voters?

Can you possibly believe that the loss of Trump voters’ jobs, their prospects, their children’s prospects, their home, their declining living standards, the insults heaped upon Americans by Hillary’s Democratic Party—“Trump deplorables,” “white male oppressors,” “Russia’s Fifth Column,” “misogynists,” “racists,” “homophobic,” “gun nuts” —had no impact on why Americans voted for Trump? How could any sentient American believe that Putin is the source of their problems?

The NY Times presstitutes report without any evidence alleged efforts of Russia to create chaos in America. I could not stop laughing. There is no Russian National Endowment for Democracy operating in the US. There is no Russian funded George Soros operating in America. There are no Russian funded Non-Governmental Organizations operating in America. Yet Russia is full of Washington-funded organizations doing everything in their power to sow chaos in Russia.

Why isn’t this most obvious of all truths reported in the NY Times?

The answer is that no truth whatsoever, not even a tiny morsel, fits the fabricated explanations in which the insouciant Western peoples live. Everywhere in the Western World people are shielded from reality by controlled explanations handed down to them by the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, BBC, et. al, and the UK, EU, Canadian, and Australian newspapers, every one of which is a propagandist for American hegemony.

A few years ago a famous philosopher concluded that the world lives in a constructed virtual reality. At the time I thought he was crazy, but I have learned that he is correct. The entire world—even the Russians and the Chinese and the Iranians—live in a world shaped by American propaganda. The truth is that a country, the USA, which endorses freedom of determination, is in fact determined to control the world and smother all self-determination. Every country, whether Russia, China, Syria, Iran, India, Turkey, North Korea, Venezuela, that resists Washington’s hegemony is declared by Washington to be “a threat to the international order.”

The “international order” is Washington’s order. The “International Order” is Washinton’s hegemony over the world. Russia, China, Iran, Syria, North Korea, Venezuela, and now Turkey and India are threats to “international order” because they do not accept Washington’s hegemony.

Barnes and Rosenberg report that Coats is concerned about Russia’s effort to “weaken and divide the United States.” There is no sign of Russia doing any such thing, and there is no explanation of how Putin conducts “a broad chaos campaign to undermine faith in American democracy.” If the Director of National Intelligence is concerned about the forces of division in America, he should turn his attention to the divisive consequences of the Democratic Party’s Identity Politics, to ANTIFA, to the divisive consequences of the fabricated attack on President Trump by the military/security complex and presstitute media. Indeed, the constant drumbeat of lies from the New York Times alone has caused far move divisiveness than anything Russia is alleged to have done.

Divisiveness is what happens when the military/security complex and its media pimps turn on a President for threatening their budget by proposing peace with the enemy that they have constructed in order to justify their power and profit. It is this divisiveness that the United States is experiencing.

More from Articles & Columns ↓