South Africa Is On The Road To Barbarism and So Is the
Rest of the West
South Africa Is On The Road To Barbarism
Life in a failed multi-cultural society:
Identity Politics At Work:
Notice that at a Human Rights Day rally in Mpumalanga,
“human rights” is associated with “cutting the throat of whiteness.” This
legitimizes the murder and dispossession of South African whites, who have been
in the country longer than most blacks, as an exercise in human rights. The
leader of the new black party that is challenging the one to which the former
white government handed over power even has a song about shooting whites.
How many years before it happens in “diversity
multi-cultural” Europe and America?
What is wrong with the Russians that they want to be
associated with a West that is actively pursuing self-destruction? How long
before it is not only white South Africans who are fleeing to Russia to save
their lives?
Who destroyed the West? There are different answers to
this question. I believe the unleashed greed of Capitalism by deregulation, the
burial of Anti-Trust, and the redefinition of corporate responsibility to
include only responsibility to shareholders to the detriment of employees,
customers, and communities, destroyed the West. Psychology Professor Kevin
McDonald thinks it was the paranoia of the Jews who protected themselves by
fomenting division within the societies in which they live.
In a review of McDonald’s book, The Culture of
Critique, labeled by the Israel Lobby an anti-semitic work, Stanley
Hornbeck writes:
“Prof. MacDonald claims that one of the most
consistent ways in which Jews have advanced their interests has been to promote
pluralism and diversity – but only for others. Ever since the
19th century, they have led movements that tried to discredit the traditional
foundations of gentile society: patriotism, racial loyalty, the Christian basis
for morality, social homogeneity, and sexual restraint. At the same time,
within their own communities, and with regard to the state of Israel, they have
often supported the very institutions they attack in gentile society.
“Why is this in the interests of Jews? Because the
parochial group loyalty characteristic of Jews attracts far less attention in a
society that does not have a cohesive racial and cultural core. The Jewish
determination not to assimilate fully, which accounts for their survival as a
people for thousands for years – even without a country – has invariably
attracted unpleasant and even murderous scrutiny in nations with well-defined
national identities. In Prof. MacDonald’s view it is therefore in the interest
of Jews to dilute and weaken the identity of any people among whom they live.
Jewish identity can flower in safety only when gentile identity is weak.
“Prof. MacDonald quotes a remarkable passage from
Charles Silberman: ‘American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because
of their belief – one firmly rooted in history – that Jews are safe only in a
society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a
diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not
approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews
to endorse ‘gay rights’ and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called
‘social’ issues.'”
I do not know Professor MacDonald and cannot attest as
to whether he is or is not an anti-semite. However, I do not see anti-semitism
in his explanation, which is a rational explanation of why a paranoid people
who have experienced persecution, justified or not, would strive to protect
themselves by creating division in the societies in which they are a minority.
The Identity Politics of the Democratic Party works perfectly in behalf of the
Jewish strategy.
There is no doubt that this strategy works for Jews
who feel threatened despite the enormous power that they wield over the US and
Europe. The question is: Is the strategy that is successful for Jews good for
the majority populations who have been turned against one another: blacks
against whites, feminists against men, homosexuals against heterosexuals. Does
making the white heterosexual father, son, and brother into the victimizer who
victimizes everyone else a healthy formula for a successful society?
I can’t see how this question can be answered in the
affirmative.
/https://www.niagarafallsreview.ca/content/dam/thestar/news/canada/2021/09/25/huawei-executive-meng-wanzhou-receives-warm-welcome-upon-return-to-china/_1_meng_wanzhou_2.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.