Federal Appeals Court Agrees to Accept Evidence for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s
Innocence
Federal Appeals Court Agrees to Accept
Evidence for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s Innocence
Paul Craig Roberts
On October 26 attorney John Remington Graham
explained on this website why he suspects that the trial of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev,
the surving brother of the alleged Boston Marathon bombing, is a case of
judicial murder.
He wrote: “As a last hurrah as a lawyer, I
recently filed a motion in behalf of three American citizens before the First
Circuit in the appeal of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, asking that they be recognized as
friends of the court, so they can show that, on the basis of facts actually of
record before the federal district court in Boston, Dzhokhar did not detonate a
pressure-cooker bomb on Boylston Street on April 15, 2013, as charged in the
indictment. The government and major media of the United States have
created such confusion and libelled the accused so foully that it is impossible
for the average citizen relying on newspapers to imagine that Dzhokhar is
innocent. Major media waged a lock-step propaganda campaign against Mr.
Tsarnaev.”
On November 11, Mr. Graham informed me that
the Federal Appeals Court for the First Circuit granted his intervention of
amicus curiae. This means that the Appeals Court will accept evidence that
Dzhokhar is innocent—a case not made by Dzhokhar’s appointed attorney at the
trial.
/https://www.niagarafallsreview.ca/content/dam/thestar/news/canada/2021/09/25/huawei-executive-meng-wanzhou-receives-warm-welcome-upon-return-to-china/_1_meng_wanzhou_2.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.