Mikhail
Gorbachev R.I.P.
Paul Craig Roberts
Mikhail Gorbachev was the first President of the
Soviet Union and the last Soviet leader. He was the best of the younger
generation of Communist Party members who understood, like US President Ronald
Reagan, the futility of the Cold War and the needless threat of nuclear
Armageddon. Gorbachev also understood that the repressions and hardships of the
Soviet years were unnecessary, and he with advisors, some of whom I met and
engaged in discussion, attempted to reform the Soviet system. There is no
question that he was a great man and a sincere leader of the Soviet peoples.
President Reagan realized Gorbachev’s greatness.
Reagan also realized that Gorbachev was limited in his ability to end the Cold
War by distrustful elements in the Politburo. President Reagan’s plan, in which
I was a participant, was to rescue the US economy from “stagflation” and then
to put pressure of a threatened arms race–Star Wars– on the Soviet Union in
order to enhance Gorbachev’s position in favor of ending the Cold War than to
subject the struggling Soviet economy to an arms race with a revitalized US
economy.
Reagan, despite the CIA’s opposition and that of the
US military/security complex, carried out his plan not in order to win the cold
war but as Reagan repeatedly stressed to all of us involved to end the
Cold War. None of us, Reagan included, had any idea of Soviet collapse. Our
purpose was to halt a gratuitous conflict that threatened humanity with nuclear
Armageddon.
What we did not realize was that hardline elements of
the Soviet Communist Party thought that Gorbachev was making too many
concessions to the West too soon without sufficient reciprocal concessions and
guarantees. Apparently, Gorbachev himself did not realize it.
Reagan proceeded with care. He invited Gorbachev to
the White House. Reagan convinced the distinguished American pianist, Van
Cliburn, to come out of retirement and perform for Gorbachev in the White
House. Van Cliburn had won, with Khrushchev’s approval, the inaugural
International Tchaikovsky Competition in Moscow in 1958. In addition to
classics of Russian composers, Van Cliburn regaled Gorbachev with Russian folk
songs. President Reagan absolutely forbade any derogatory reference to the
Soviet Union. Nothing, not even the CIA, was to prevent the end of the Cold
War.
After Reagan’s second term ended, I had less
connection with his successor, his former vice president, George H. W. Bush,
but I know for an absolute fact that Secretary of State James Baker gave
assurances to Gorbachev that if Gorbachev permitted the unification of Germany,
NATO would not move one inch to the East. There is no doubt about this, despite
the denials by American neoconservatives and Clinton regime officials.
The Soviet Union collapsed, not because of Reagan, but
because the hardline Communists, disturbed, as is understandable, by
Gorbachev’s trust in Washington’s word, attempted a coup and placed Gorbachev
under house arrest. It was this miscalculation that brought about the collapse
of the Soviet government and the rise of Yeltsin, who, intentionally or not,
essentially was under Washington’s control.
Gorbachev, believing as did Reagan, in the futility of
the Cold War, trusted that the conflict was over. Gorbachev’s mistake was that
he did not understand Washington. An American President can make an agreement
that can be rescinded by a successor. This is the case even if there are signed
documents, but in the absence of signed documents, the corrupt Clinton regime
was able to claim no such agreement as NATO not moving to Russia’s borders ever
existed.
In view of the Democrat Clinton regime’s overthrowing
the Reagan-Gorbachev ending of the Cold War with a New Cold War, now greatly
expanded under the Democrat Biden, the Kremlin’s toleration of the West’s
declared aggressive intentions against Russia is puzzling. How can anyone in
the Kremlin ever again believe a word that Washington says?
In Russia Gorbachev is not seen as the great leader
that he was. In America ignorant flag-waving patriots mistakenly base their
pride on Reagan winning the Cold War.
As far as I, a participant, can tell, neither side
understands what has happened.
https://ria.ru/20220831/nato-1813306958.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.