The true origins of the two World Wars have been deleted from all our history books and replaced with mythology. Neither War was started (or desired) by Germany, but both at the instigation of a group of European Zionist Jews with the stated intent of the total destruction of Germany. The documentation is overwhelming and the evidence undeniable. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)
That history is being repeated today in a mass grooming of the Western world’s people (especially Americans) in preparation for World War III – which I believe is now imminent.
Washington and its French
vassal have refined how they conduct their false flag operations. With the
Charlie Hebdo operation, they knew to immediately set the story in stone in
order to avoid any questions from the print and TV media and in order to use
the set story to take the place of an investigation.
The set story made it
unnecessary to explain the mysterious “suicide” of one of the main police
investigators while engaged in the investigation of the event. The set story
also made it unnecessary to explain why it was necessary to kill rather than
capture the alleged perpetrators, or to explain how the French authorities
could be so wrong about the alleged get-away-driver but not about the two
gunmen. There has been no explanation why the authorities believed there was a
get-away-driver, and no such driver has been captured or killed. Indeed, there
are many unanswered questions of no interest to any media except the
alternative Internet media.
What the US and France
learned from the Charlie Hebdo skepticism on the Internet is to keep the story
flowing. Charlie Hebdo involved two scenes of violence, and the connection
between the two acts of terrorism was vague. This time there were several
scenes of violence, and they were better connected in the story.
More importantly, the
story was followed quickly by more drama, such as the pursuit of a suspected
perpetrator into Belgium, a French bombing attack on the Islamic State, a
French aircraft carrier sent to the Middle East, a declaration of war by the
French President against ISIL, and speculation that Hollande, pressured by
Washington, will invoke NATO’s Article V, which will pull NATO into an invasion
of the Islamic State. By superceding each event with a new one, the public’s
attention is shifted away from the attack itself and the interests served by
the attack. Already the attack itself is old news. The public’s attention has
been led elsewhere. How soon will NATO have boots on the ground?
The Western media has
avoided many interesting aspects of the Paris attacks. For example, what did
the directors of the CIA and French intelligence discuss at their meeting a few
days prior to the Paris attacks. Why were fake passports used to identify
attackers? Why did the attacks occur on the same day as a multi-site simulation
of a terrorist attack involving first responders, police, emergency services
and medical personnel? Why has there been no media investigation of the report
that French police were blinded by a sophisticated cyber attack on their mobile
data tracking system? Does anyone really believe that ISIL has such capability?
The Western media serves
merely as an amplifier of the government’s propaganda. Even the non-Western
media follows this pattern because of the titillating effect. It is a good
story for the media, and it requires no effort.
Initially even the
Russian media served to trumphet the set story that rescues the Western
political establishment from politial defeat at home and Russian defeat in
Syria. But it wasn’t too long before some of the Russian media remembered
numerous false stories about a Russian invasion of Ukraine, about Assad’s use
of chemical weapons, about US ABMs being placed on Russia’s borders to protect
Europe from nonexistant Iranian nuclear ICBMs. And so on.
Russian media began
asking questions and received some good answers from Gearoid O Colmain:
To understand the Paris
attacks, it helps to begin with the question: “What is ISIL?” Apparently, ISIL
is a creation of the CIA or some deep-state organization shielded by the CIA’s
operations department. ISIL seems to have been used to overthrow Quadaffi in
Libya and then sent to overthrow Assad in Syria. One would think that ISIL
would be throughly infiltrated by the CIA, Mossad, British and French
intelligence. Perhaps ISIL is discovering that it is an independent power and
is substituting an agenda of its own for Washington’s, but ISIL still appears
to be at least partially dependent on support, active or passive, from
Washington.
ISIL is a new group that
suddenly appeared. ISIL is portrayed as barbaric knife-wielding fanatics from
medieval times. How did such a group so quickly acquire such extensive global
capability as to blow a Russian airliner out of Egyptian skies, conduct
bombings in Lebanon and Turkey, outwit French intelligence and conduct
successful multi-prong attacks in Paris? How come ISIL never attacks Israel?
The next question is:
“How does the Paris attack benefit ISIL?” Is it a benefit to ISIL to have
Europe’s borders closed, thus halting ISIL’s ability to infiltrate Europe as
refugees? Does it help ISIL to provoke French bombing of ISIL positions in the
Middle East and to bring upon itself a NATO invasion?
Who does benefit?
Clearly, the European and American political establishment in so many ways.
Establishment political parties in France, Germany, and the UK are in trouble,
because they enabled Washington’s Middle East wars that are bringing floods of
refugees into Europe. Pegida is rising in Germany, Farage’s Independent Party
in the UK, and Marine Le Pen’s National Front in France. Indeed, a recent poll
showed Marine Le Pen in the lead as the next president of France.
The Paris attack takes
the issue and the initiative away from these dissident political parties. Among
the first words out of the mouth of the French president in response to the
attack was his declaration that the borders of France are closed. Already
Merkel’s political allies in Germany are pushing her government in that
direction. “Paris changes everything,” they declare. It certainly saved the
European political establishment from defeat and loss of power.
The same result occurred
in the US. Outsiders Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders were slaughtering the
establishment’s presidential candidates. Trump and Sanders had the momentum.
But “Paris changes everything.” Trump and Sanders are now sidelined, out of the
news. The momentum is lost. The story has changed. “Paris attacks become focus
of 2016 race,” declares CNN:
Also among the early
words from the French president, and without any evidence in support, was
Hollande’s declaration that the Islamic State had attacked the French nation. Obviously, it is set for Hollande to invoke NATO’s Article V, which would send
a NATO invasion force into Syria. This would be Washington’s way of countering
the Russian initiative that has saved the Assad government from defeat by the
Islamic State. The NATO invasion would overthrow Assad as part of the war
against the Islamic State.
The Russian government
did not immediately recognize this threat. The Russian government saw in the
Paris attack the opportunity to gain Western cooperation in the fight against
ISIL. The Russian line has been that we must all fight ISIL together.
The Russian presence,
although highly effective, is small in Syria. What does the Russian government
do when its policy in Syria is crowded by a NATO invasion?
The only benefactor of
the Paris attack is the Western political establishment and Washington’s goal
of unseating Assad in Syria. The Paris attack has removed the threat to the
French, German, and British political establishments from the National Front,
Pegida, and the UK Independence Party. The Paris attack has removed the threat
to the US political establishment from Trump and Sanders. The Paris attack has
advanced Washington’s goal of removing Assad from power.
The answer to the Roman
question, “*cui bono,” is clear.
But don’t expect to hear
it from the Western media. *a principle that probable responsibility for an act or event lies with one having something to gain
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts' latest books areThe Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
The true origins of the two World Wars have been deleted from all our history books and replaced with mythology. Neither War was started (or desired) by Germany, but both at the instigation of a group of European Zionist Jews with the stated intent of the total destruction of Germany. The documentation is overwhelming and the evidence undeniable. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)
That history is being repeated today in a mass grooming of the Western world’s people (especially Americans) in preparation for World War III – which I believe is now imminent.
What part will your country play in World War III?
By Larry Romanoff, May 27, 2021
The true origins of the two World Wars have been deleted from all our history books and replaced with mythology. Neither War was started (or desired) by Germany, but both at the instigation of a group of European Zionist Jews with the stated intent of the total destruction of Germany. The documentation is overwhelming and the evidence undeniable. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)
Discurso do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin, na manhã do dia 24 de Fevereiro de 2022
Discurso do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin, Tradução em português
Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin: Cidadãos da Rússia, Amigos,
Considero ser necessário falar hoje, de novo, sobre os trágicos acontecimentos em Donbass e sobre os aspectos mais importantes de garantir a segurança da Rússia.
Começarei com o que disse no meu discurso de 21 de Fevereiro de 2022. Falei sobre as nossas maiores responsabilidades e preocupações e sobre as ameaças fundamentais que os irresponsáveis políticos ocidentais criaram à Rússia de forma continuada, com rudeza e sem cerimónias, de ano para ano. Refiro-me à expansão da NATO para Leste, que está a aproximar cada vez mais as suas infraestruturas militares da fronteira russa.
É um facto que, durante os últimos 30 anos, temos tentado pacientemente chegar a um acordo com os principais países NATO, relativamente aos princípios de uma segurança igual e indivisível, na Europa. Em resposta às nossas propostas, enfrentámos invariavelmente, ou engano cínico e mentiras, ou tentativas de pressão e de chantagem, enquanto a aliança do Atlântico Norte continuou a expandir-se, apesar dos nossos protestos e preocupações. A sua máquina militar está em movimento e, como disse, aproxima-se da nossa fronteira.
Porque é que isto está a acontecer? De onde veio esta forma insolente de falar que atinge o máximo do seu excepcionalismo, infalibilidade e permissividade? Qual é a explicação para esta atitude de desprezo e desdém pelos nossos interesses e exigências absolutamente legítimas?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.