The true origins of the two World Wars have been deleted from all our history books and replaced with mythology. Neither War was started (or desired) by Germany, but both at the instigation of a group of European Zionist Jews with the stated intent of the total destruction of Germany. The documentation is overwhelming and the evidence undeniable. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)
That history is being repeated today in a mass grooming of the Western world’s people (especially Americans) in preparation for World War III – which I believe is now imminent.
The “found passport” worked for them for 9/11. It
worked again for Charlie Hebdo. So now they have used it a third time. They
know that Americans are total dumbshits and can be told anything. No matter how
preposterous, the dumbshits will believe it. But Americans are not capable of
believing truth. They have been brainwashed that truth is “conspiracy theory.”
A population this stupid has no future.
Remember, on 9/11 an exercise simulating the day’s
real events was being conducted. Again, we hear the same thing about the Paris
attacks. What an unusual coincidence! But the dumbshit Western populations are
not capable of noticing. Apparently neither are the Russians.
The articles below show that there is a lot of room
for a lot of suspicion.
Patrick Pelloux revealed on national radio on Saturday that the French
military conducted a “multi-site” military exercise in Paris on the same
day as the Paris attacks on November 13.
He said that the Paris emergency services were so well prepared,
because “by chance” they had been planning for a similar scenario.
Transcript:
“By chance”, (le hasard a fait”) in the morning at the Paris SAMU
(EMT), a multi-site attack exercise had been planned.”
“So we were prepared. What needs to be known is there was a
mobilisation of police forces, firemen, EMTs, associations who came [to
participate] and we tried to save as many people as possible.”
TV Broadcast
Original French transcript:
Le hasard a fait, pour vous dire, c’est que le matin au SAMU de Paris,
avait été organisé un exercice sur des attentats multisites. Donc on était
préparés. Donc ce qu’il faut voir c’est que vous aviez une mobilisation des
forces de police, des pompiers, des SAMU, des associatifs qui sont venus et on
a essayé de sauver le plus de monde possible.
The White House
correspondent for French television network Canal+, Laura Haim, reported an
interesting tidbit during a live report with MSNBC’s Brian Williams Friday
evening.
Haim stated that
Central Intelligence Agency director, John O. Brennan, recently met with his
counterpart, French intelligence (DGSE) directorBernard Bajolet.
The French
equivalent of MI6 and CIA is the Direction générale de la sécurité extérieure.
See: CIA-GW Intelligence Conference:
Panel on The Shared 21st Century International Mission –GW Center for Cyber and Homeland Security 29
Oct 2015 Panel on “The Shared 21st Century International Mission” featuring CIA
Director John Brennan, former UK MI6 Chief John Sawers, Director of the French
Directorate for External Security Bernard Bajolet, and former Israeli National
Security Advisor Yaacov Amidror.
Held as part of
the 2nd Annual Ethos and Profession of Intelligence Conference, co-hosted by
the Central Intelligence Agency and the George Washington University. Held on
October 27, 2015.
Le chef du renseignement extérieur français, Bernard Bajolet, a laissé
entendre que des pays comme l’Irak ou la Syrie ne retrouveraient jamais leur
ancienne physionomie. ”Le Moyen-Orient que nous avons connu est fini et je
doute qu’il revienne”, a déclaré, en anglais, le directeur de la DGSE
(Direction générale de la sécurité extérieure), dans une conférence mardi sur
le renseignement à laquelle participait également le directeur de la CIA John
Brennan.
We’ve heard this
one before, but this time they are doubling down on this all-too familiar set
piece.
Details are emerging after last night’s horrific events in Paris, and
one particular item of investigation is all too familiar.
AFP, RT, Reuters, ITV, Sky News, AP, Fox News and Sputnik, are all reporting that
a Syrian passport was found either on, or near, the body of one of
the suicide bombers in Paris.
For those of you unaware, this story is a mirror image of another that
surfaced on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001.
Watch a video of
this report here:
Apparently, according to CBS, “a passerby found the
passport of one of the hijackers” on the street just hours after the 9/11
attacks.
Interestingly, in the same breath, a FOX News reporter speaking about
the story says that the building it supposedly came from was completely engulfed in fire
How would a passport survive the ordeal of being crashed into a
building while inside a plane loaded with jet fuel?
This story was eventually buried and given very little coverage at all
by media outlets.
Instead of blindingly accepting this story from French authorities,
mainstream media would do themselves far better by asking the following
questions:
Was the passport found on, or nearby, the suicide bomber? If it was not
physically on their person, it is possible that is did not belong to them.
Speaking of not belonging to them, just because someone is in
possession of an object does not necessarily make them the owner of it.
Who exactly found this passport? Is the passport real? If it is real,
is it valid?
When was the passport last used to make entry into France?
What condition is the passport in?
Is it possible that the passport was planted by a third party?
Could the passport have ever survived in the conditions under which it
was supposedly exposed to?
These are all questions that any real investigator should,
and hopefully will, be asking. The consequences of this alleged Syrian passport
being used as evidence can only be dire.
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 11/15/2015 10:12 -0500
Yesterday, when we explained just how the tragic events in France over the past 48 hours unfolded precisely as we predicted they would two months ago (ironically, as per our post from September 11, 2015) we commented on the oddly fortuitous discovery of an intact Syrian passport found next to the body of one of the suicide bombers, a passport which Greece chimed in as belonging to a Syrian refugee who had entered the country at Leros on October 3, 2015 from where he subsequently travelled all the way to Paris.
Specifically, we said that "we admit to not being experts on the nuances, or even basics, of "suicide bombing for terrorists 101", but is bringing your own passport to an event that will be your last, really that crucial, especially when the passport is such a critical smoking gun?"
The following cartoon best captures the idiocy of anyone actually believing a suicide bomber would have brought their actual passport to what they knew would be their last act on earth.
Shortly thereafter, it was Serbia's turn to join the story of the rogue "Syrian refugee", when the Serbian newspaper Blic published the picture of the alleged Syrian passport belonging to a 25-year-old man named Ahmed Almohamed, and said he had crossed into the country on 7 October, having arrived four days earlier in Leros, Greece, seeking Serbian refugee status.
Then a Greek newspaper, Protothema, said he was travelling with a second man, Mohammed Almuhamed, and published pictures purporting to show their travel documents. The Guardian proposed the following map to track Ahma's progress across Europe:
And then a few hours ago, the story took an even more surreal twist when we learned that, according to both French and US sources, the passport was "definitely a forgery."
The Syrian passport recovered from near one of the Paris attackers may be fake, a US intelligence official told CBS news. The document did not contain the correct numbers for a legitimate Syrian passport and the picture did not match the name, said the official.
The passport found near the body of one of the eight attackers who struck on Friday, 13 November, was used to enter the European Union through Greece in October. The Serbian interior ministry said that the passport was used to enter that country on 7 October, by a man claiming refugee status.
So how to make sense from a story that has drifted from the merely laughable, to the bizarre, to the outright surreal? Guardian's Patrick Kingsley attempts an explanation:
There are several reasons why it’s worth waiting until all the facts are known before making too strong a link between the attacks and the refugee crisis. The first is a general one: on at least 12 occasions, Isis has actually criticised refugees for fleeing to Europe. “For those who want to blame the attacks on Paris on refugees, you might want to get your facts straight,” wrote Aaron Zelin, an analyst of jihad, in an online commentary about the 12 outbursts. “The reality is, [Isis] loathes that individuals are fleeing Syria for Europe. It undermines [Isis’s] message that its self-styled caliphate is a refuge.” It’s therefore unlikely that the vast majority of Syrians fleeing to Europe are Isis supporters, since their actions are in obvious contravention of the group’s creed.
The second reason for caution is more specific. Investigators still need to verify the Syrian passport was carried by an attacker rather than a dead bystander (one Egyptian passport-holder initially believed to be an assailant turned out to be an injured victim). They will then need to be certain that the passport’s carrier was the same as the passport’s legitimate owner.
It’s possible that it was stolen. Since the possession of a Syrian passport makes it easier to claim asylum in Europe, there is a busy trade in stolen Syrian documents. Syrians interviewed on Greece’s border with Macedonia have described how they were mugged for their passports after leaving the Greek islands as they tried to make their way north through the Balkans. Such passports can be sold on for as much as several thousand euros, in a trade that the EU’s border agency acknowledges is a growing problem. Forgeries are also common; a Dutch journalist recently had one made in the name of his prime minister.
A third red flag is the fact that the passport concerned was found in the first place. Analysts find it strange that a bomber would remember to bring his passport on a mission, particularly one who does not intend to return alive. “Why would a jihadist who expressly rejects all notions of modern citizenship take his passport on a suicide mission?” tweeted Charlie Winter, an analyst focusing on Islamist extremism. “So it gets found.”
One theory is that Isis hopes to turn Europe against Syrian refugees. This would reinforce the idea of unresolvable divisions between east and west, and Christians and Muslims, and so persuade Syrians that Islamic State’s self-proclaimed caliphate is their best hope of protection. “You know what pissed off Islamist extremists the most about Europe?” summarised Iyad El-Baghdadi, an activist and jihadi-watcher, on Twitter. “It was watching their very humane, moral response to the refugee crisis.”
His conclusion:
"Whether the passport was planted, stolen, forged or genuine, investigators should find out the truth soon enough. But regardless of what they discover, a wider debate has now begun about the wisdom of letting so many unknown migrants enter Europe through its southern borders, and being allowed to move onwards through the continent with few restrictions. Already, there are calls to step up the policing of Greece’s maritime border with Turkey, and to block the passage of refugees entirely."
What is becoming clear is that either the passport was planted, or is a fake, or both. But while we agree with the Guardian that this shift in narrative will have an impact against the future flow of refugees into Europe, an even more acute consequence will from the "Syrian" angle will be to "incept" the idea that the entire Paris massacre was the result of events in Syria (and hence, al Assad is directly and indirectly responsible) thus generating goodwill toward a military operation that include a French ground force. In fact, the wheels are already in motion:
France may send its "expeditionary force" to Syria in order to retaliate against ISIL, according to the US-based intelligence firm Stratfor; the group has claimed responsibility for Friday's terrorist attacks in Paris, which claimed at least 129 lives.
Analysts from the private intelligence company Stratfor believe that France may send its "expeditionary force" to Syria or Iraq in response to the deadly Paris attacks that rocked the French capital on Friday night. They claimed that France has a whole array of options for retaliation "at its disposal", but that the country's response will depend on "who was ultimately responsible" for the Friday attacks.
"If it is found that the Islamic State core group was indeed behind the November 13 attack, France will likely ramp up its Syrian air operations," Stratfor said.
In light of this, Stratfor analysts predicted that France may increase its programs to train and support anti-Islamic State forces in Iraq and Syria, or even to carry out "commando strikes against key leadership nodes."
"France also has the option of deploying an expeditionary force like it did in the Sahel [region of Africa], although that would probably require outside airlift capacity from NATO allies, especially the United States," Stratfor pointed out.
And the latest surprise, is that moments ago it was Greece again which claimed that despite allegations to the contrary, the passport was, in fact, real. How it "concluded" this remains a mystery...
... and once again shows that there is a deep political motive on virtually every side to use this human tragedy as a "false flag" event to achieve specific, geopolitical goals.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
The true origins of the two World Wars have been deleted from all our history books and replaced with mythology. Neither War was started (or desired) by Germany, but both at the instigation of a group of European Zionist Jews with the stated intent of the total destruction of Germany. The documentation is overwhelming and the evidence undeniable. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)
That history is being repeated today in a mass grooming of the Western world’s people (especially Americans) in preparation for World War III – which I believe is now imminent.
What part will your country play in World War III?
By Larry Romanoff, May 27, 2021
The true origins of the two World Wars have been deleted from all our history books and replaced with mythology. Neither War was started (or desired) by Germany, but both at the instigation of a group of European Zionist Jews with the stated intent of the total destruction of Germany. The documentation is overwhelming and the evidence undeniable. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)
Discurso do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin, na manhã do dia 24 de Fevereiro de 2022
Discurso do Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin, Tradução em português
Presidente da Rússia, Vladimir Putin: Cidadãos da Rússia, Amigos,
Considero ser necessário falar hoje, de novo, sobre os trágicos acontecimentos em Donbass e sobre os aspectos mais importantes de garantir a segurança da Rússia.
Começarei com o que disse no meu discurso de 21 de Fevereiro de 2022. Falei sobre as nossas maiores responsabilidades e preocupações e sobre as ameaças fundamentais que os irresponsáveis políticos ocidentais criaram à Rússia de forma continuada, com rudeza e sem cerimónias, de ano para ano. Refiro-me à expansão da NATO para Leste, que está a aproximar cada vez mais as suas infraestruturas militares da fronteira russa.
É um facto que, durante os últimos 30 anos, temos tentado pacientemente chegar a um acordo com os principais países NATO, relativamente aos princípios de uma segurança igual e indivisível, na Europa. Em resposta às nossas propostas, enfrentámos invariavelmente, ou engano cínico e mentiras, ou tentativas de pressão e de chantagem, enquanto a aliança do Atlântico Norte continuou a expandir-se, apesar dos nossos protestos e preocupações. A sua máquina militar está em movimento e, como disse, aproxima-se da nossa fronteira.
Porque é que isto está a acontecer? De onde veio esta forma insolente de falar que atinge o máximo do seu excepcionalismo, infalibilidade e permissividade? Qual é a explicação para esta atitude de desprezo e desdém pelos nossos interesses e exigências absolutamente legítimas?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.