Apparently, ISIL is a creation of the CIA or some deep-state organization shielded by the CIA’s operations department. ISIL seems to have been used to overthrow Quadaffi in Libya and then sent to overthrow Assad in Syria. One would think that ISIL would be throughly infiltrated by the CIA, Mossad, British and French intelligence. Perhaps ISIL is discovering that it is an independent power and is substituting an agenda of its own for Washington’s, but ISIL still appears to be at least partially dependent on support, active or passive, from Washington.
How come ISIL never attacks Israel?
Is it a benefit to ISIL to have Europe’s borders closed, thus halting ISIL’s ability to infiltrate Europe as refugees? Does it help ISIL to provoke French bombing of ISIL positions in the Middle East and to bring upon itself a NATO invasion?
Obviously, it is set for Hollande to invoke NATO’s Article V, which would send a NATO invasion force into Syria.
This would be Washington’s way of countering the Russian initiative that has saved the Assad government from defeat by the Islamic State. The NATO invasion would overthrow Assad as part of the war against the Islamic State.
The Paris attack has removed the threat to the French, German, and British political establishments from the National Front, Pegida, and the UK Independence Party.
The Paris attack has removed the threat to the US political establishment from Trump and Sanders.
The Paris attack has advanced Washington’s goal of removing Assad from power.
*a principle that probable responsibility for an act or event lies with one having something to gain