CHRIS KANTHAN -- NEW WORLD ORDER 2.0 IS INEVITABLE

  

CHRIS  KANTHAN --  NEW WORLD ORDER 2.0 IS INEVITABLE

The attack on Russia is the biggest geopolitical gamble in America’s history. If it succeeds, America will be the indisputable hegemon of the world, leading to a truly one-world government. On the other hand, if it fails, the American Century and the U.S. dollar’s status as the global currency will collapse unceremoniously. We are living through a momentous and dangerous arc of history.

Time is running out for America

Let’s start with the big picture. America’s preeminence is rapidly fading. The US’ share of global GDP is shrinking, and America’s debt is exploding. How long can the US dollar enjoy its “exorbitant privelege”? Max 10-15 years. America’s democracy is also faltering and the country is deeply divided.

Meanwhile, anti-American forces like China, Russia, and Iran are getting stronger. Russia has hypersonic missiles with multiple nuclear warheads that US missile defense systems cannot stop. China’s GDP is whopping $18 trillion now. And if Europe has peaceful relations with Russia (provider of cheap energy) and China (provider of cheap manufactured goods), the so-called Eurasia will have an economy twice as large as the US’. Even vassal states like Saudi Arabia are now starting to rebel, daring to sell oil for Yuan. Thus, something has to be done.

Plan A: Contain China

The US tried to contain and decouple from China during the Trump administration. However, that failed miserably: USA-China trade was whopping $650 billion in 2021. The next option could have been to isolate China by pulling Russia away from China’s orbit. Sort of like what President Eisenhower did when he invited the Soviet leader Khrushchev to the White House in 1959. (In 1972, Nixon did the divide-and-conquer in the other way by allying with China and isolating the USSR).

Plan B: Crush Russia, Strengthen Dollar

F. William Engdahl Newsletter -- Ukraine and the Deeper Global Suicide Agenda -- 25:03:2022

    

F. William Engdahl Newsletter  -- Ukraine and the Deeper Global Suicide Agenda -- 25:03:2022                                                                                             

 

What Moscow calls a limited military operation in Ukraine has been met with an incredible series of Western economic sanctions and information warfare since it began late February, 2022. What so far has been missing owing to unprecedented NATO censorship of all media is the context of the Russian military action. The following are two pieces relevant to this in a most complex situation that has the potential to escalate into a new global war. The first essay is a brief summary of events since 1991 in Ukraine regarding Russia, NATO and Washington. The second is an essay I wrote in 2014 for my German book on Ukraine following the CIA coup d’etat in Kiew. As with most every major war of the past century, the reality is far more complex than presented.

 

 

Ukraine and the Deeper Global Suicide Agenda

 

By F. William Engdahl, 8 March, 2022

 

 

 

The decision by the Russian President to order military action in neighboring Ukraine beginning February 22, 2022 has shocked many, myself included. The question at this point almosttwo weeks into military action by Russian and other forces inside Ukraine, is what pushed Russia into what Western media portrays as unilateral unwarranted war of aggression. A public threat by Ukrainian president and comedian Volodymyr Zelenskyy on February 19, during meetings with top-level NATO officials and others in the annual Munich Security Conference,  provides a largely-ignored clue to Moscow actions. In addition more recent reports of numerous US Pentagon bioweapons labs across Ukraine add to the background threats. Did Moscow believe Russia faced a literal do-or-die reality?

 

 

 

Some essential history

 

The current conflict in Ukraine has its seeds in the 1990’s and the US-backed collapse of the Soviet Union. During high-level Two Plus Four Treaty talks pertaining to Germany’s reunification in 1990, talks between US Secretary of State James Baker III and then-Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, along with France, the UK and the West German government, over unification of Germany, Baker gave a verbal promise that NATO would not move “one inch” to the East to threaten former Soviet territories, in return for the USSR allowing German reunification within NATO.[i]

 

For years Washington has lied about the exchange, as they moved one after the other former Warsaw Pact countries including Poland, Czech Republic, Romania, Hungary, Baltic States into NATO and closer to striking distance to Russia. Recently Putin cited the 1990 Baker agreement to justify Russian demands that NATO and Washington give binding legal assurances that Ukraine would never be admitted into the NATO alliance. Washington until now has categorically refused to do so.

 

 

 

Putin’s 2007 Munich Speech

 

At the 2007 annual Munich Security Conference, as the Bush-Cheney administration had announced plans to install US missile defense systems in Poland, Romania and the Czech Republic to,“guard against rogue states such as North Korea or Iran,” Russia’s Putin delivered a scathing critique of the US lies and violation of their 1990 assurances on NATO. By that time 10 former communist Eastern states had been admitted to NATO despite the 1990 US promises. Furthermore, both Ukraine and Georgia were candidates to join NATO following US-led Color Revolutions in both countries in 2003-4.  Putin rightly argued the US missiles were aimed at Russia, not North Korea or Iran.

 

In his 2007 Munich remarks Putin told his Western audience, “It turns out that NATO has put its frontline forces on our borders, and we continue to strictly fulfil the treaty obligations and do not react to these actions at all. I think it is obvious that NATO expansion does not have any relation with the modernization of the Alliance itself, or with ensuring security in Europe. On the contrary, it represents a serious provocation that reduces the level of mutual trust. And we have the right to ask: against whom is this expansion intended? And what happened to the assurances our western partners made after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact? Where are those declarations today? No one even remembers them.” Putin added, “But I will allow myself to remind this audience what was said. I would like to quote the speech of NATO General Secretary Mr Woerner in Brussels on 17 May 1990. He said at the time that: “the fact that we are ready not to place a NATO army outside of German territory gives the Soviet Union a firm security guarantee”. Where are these guarantees?” [ii] That was 15 years ago.

 

EN — LARRY ROMANOFF — COVID-19 – A Biological Weapon Targeting Ethnicity and Body Systems — March 20, 2022

 

 

COVID-19 - A Biological Weapon Targeting Ethnicity and Body Systems

 

By Larry Romanoff, March 20, 2022

 

Much of this essay is based on the testimony of a long list of eminent physicians and scientists to the Grand Jury of the Court of Public Opinion on COVID-19, chaired by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich. (1) (2) The content here follows closely on that of my previous essay, A COVID-19 Theory I Cannot Prove. (3)

First, Let's Think

In one article (Part 4) of a series titled 'Propaganda and the Media' that I wrote for the Saker, I began with this observation:

"If I were a dictator, one of my first dictates would be that every adult must take at least one university-level course in logic. In today’s world, with what is essentially an international criminal element in control, one which effectively manages public perception through their leverage over the mass media, readers would benefit immensely from some exposure to the principles of logic." (4)

Consider for a moment the "China virus", the Wuhan lab-leak theory, the myriad other claims of China contaminating the world with COVID-19, some American groups even dramatically filing spurious lawsuits against China. Yet this was always nonsense.

Let's review something very basic. COVID-19 exploded in Wuhan and began to spread, so the health authorities first isolated Wuhan and then locked down the entire province of Hubei. The pathogen did escape Wuhan, but not Hubei. Almost all the infections and nearly every death were in Wuhan or Hubei. The virus did not escape to infect any other city or province in China. Nearby Shanghai had only a few infections and deaths while a great many cities and provinces had none, and it ended quickly.

Whitney Webb -- Meet Ghislaine: Heiress to an Espionage Empire

 

Meet Ghislaine: Heiress to an Espionage Empire

 

Whitney Webb • March 17, 2022

 

 

 

Despite being found guilty late last year for her role in sex crimes against minors, Ghislaine Maxwell, the “madam” and chief accomplice of the intelligence-linked pedophile and sex trafficker, Jeffrey Epstein, may soon walk free. A juror in the case, Scotty David, subsequently took credit for the jury’s decision to find Ghislaine Maxwell guilty and “inadvertently” revealed that he had incorrectly answered a pre-trial questionnaire. As a result, the possibility of a mistrial, and Ghislaine walking free, now looms large.

David has some interesting connections, as he currently works for the Carlyle Group – the global investment firm whose ties to the bin Laden family during the early 2000s have come under scrutiny. Carlyle’s executives often have ties to intelligence, with one example being its former chairman and then chairman emeritus, Frank Carlucci, who had been deputy director of the CIA and, later, Reagan’s Secretary of Defense. Carlyle’s current co-founder and co-chairman David Rubenstein, as noted in this article from Free Press Report, served on the board of the influential Trilateral Commission during the same time as Jeffrey Epstein, while his ex-wife Alice Rogoff (divorced in 2017) had a very close working relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell, including with her now defunct “charity” the TerraMar Project. Given the fact that there are known ties between David’s employer and Ghislaine Maxwell, why has this potential conflict of interest gone unmentioned by mainstream media?

Not only that, but – according to a family member of one of the women who testified against Maxwell during her trial – David was connected with the journalist who would publish the now infamous, post-verdict report via Vicky Ward. Ward has been denounced by Epstein victims and others close to the case for having had a past “chummy” relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell she declined to disclose for years and for subsequently telling Ghislaine that Epstein victim Maria Farmer had been the person who had first reported Maxwell and Epstein to the FBI back in 1996. Farmer later claims that Ward’s lack of journalistic integrity, after promising to keep Farmer’s identity secret, had put her life in danger and forced her into hiding.

It seems that there is, yet again, a major cover-up in the works, one which involves major centers of financial and political power in New York City and beyond. In order to fully understand the sexual trafficking and blackmail operation that Maxwell and Epstein oversaw, and why powerful forces apparently continue to intervene in the case, one must first understand its genesis, particularly how and why Ghislaine Maxwell arrived in New York City. In this second installment of “Meet Ghislaine” (read Part 1 here), the beginnings of Ghislaine’s career – closely controlled by her father, Robert Maxwell, until his 1991 death – are followed in detail.

The Young Ghislaine

Paul Craig Roberts -- Ukrainian Update # 8

 

Ukrainian Update # 8

March 21, 2022 | Categories: Articles & Columns | Tags: |  Print This Article

 

Support your website

Ukrainian Update # 8

Paul Craig Roberts

It seems the Kremlin still has delusions that there is morality in the West. The Kremlin has appealed to “international structures to make Ukrainian radicals release civilians.”  What is the point of such a useless appeal?  Why is the Kremlin attributing morality to the enemy that is trying to destroy Russia?  Does the Kremlin think it is making a point by putting the West on the spot?  

By choosing a police action over a war, the Kremlin delivered the civilians into the hands of the Ukrainian neo-Nazis.  Indeed, by refusing action for 8 years, the Kremlin allowed the neo-Nazis to take hold of large parts of Donbass while continuing to shell the areas of Donbass not under their control.  If the Kremlin had accepted the Donbass vote 8 years ago to be reunited with Russia like Crimea, the entire problem would have been avoided.  Apparently, the Kremlin was dissuaded from the obviously correct decision by the pro-West Atlanticist Integrationists among the intellectual and ruling class, who convinced the Kremlin that it would confirm US propaganda that Putin is intent on restoring the Soviet Empire for so much of an artificial Ukraine created by the Soviets to be reunited with Russia.  The entire Ukrainian problem is due to the Atlanticist Integrationists.  Why the Kremlin tolerates these agents of the West, and even appoints one of them head of the Russian central bank where she can maximize the effect of sanctions on Russia, is a mystery.  

MANLIO DINUCCI -- THE BATTLE OF INFORMATION -- GRANDANGOLO ON NATIONAL TV CHANNEL 262 BYOBLU

 

 

FRIDAY 18 MARCH AT 20:30 (Italian Time) 

ON NATIONAL TV CHANNEL 262 BYOBLU 

GRANDANGOLO

 

Grandangolo can also be seen on live TV on cell phones or computers on the site

https://www.byoblu.com/diretta-tv/ 

THE BATTLE OF INFORMATION 

It is significant that - while anyone who provides news about Ukraine that does not correspond to that of the Ministry of Truth is censured - the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom denies Julian Assange permission to appeal against extradition to the U.S., since the WikiLeaks founder's request "did not raise an arguable point of law." So the journalist who brought to light the hidden truths about the wars that prepared and provoked the one in Ukraine risks to be sentenced to 175 years in prison (after being imprisoned for ten years).

On the other hand, all those who, on the mainstream, conduct the hammering psychological warfare to represent Russia as a fierce enemy that threatens us all have a free field. A strategic advisor of the Italian Ministry of Defense, on a mainstream channel, described as "Putin's beasts who rape and play soccer with children's heads" those Syrian soldiers who, after fighting ISIS with Russian help, went to help the Russians in Ukraine.

Even the news provided by the Secretary General of NATO himself, revealing the strategy of war, are ignored, such as the one that "for many years NATO allies have trained tens of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers and supplied them with huge amounts of weapons" and that there are "in Europe one hundred thousand U.S. soldiers" deployed in recent years for the escalation against Russia. Ignored by the mainstream also the analysis of experts like Gianandrea Gaiani, director of Analisi Difesa, who warns that, by supplying weapons to Ukrainian forces, Italy has become indirectly belligerent against Russia, and that not even the Parliament knows exactly which weapons are supplied and even less in which hands they go. They "could be used to carry out criminal actions or end up on the illegal market that feeds organized crime and terrorist groups". 

GRANDANGOLO

INTERNATIONAL PRESS REVIEW

on BYOBLU, digital terrestrial channel 262 

Every Friday at 20:30 

REPLICATIONS 

Saturday 9:00 / 16:00 

Sunday 11:00 / 17:30 

Monday 8:00 / 18:45 

Tuesday 12:15 / 22:30 

Wednesday 17:15 

Thursday 18:00

 

From the Tuesday following the first broadcast, the episode of Grandangolo is visible, together with the previous ones, on the site

https://www.byoblu.com/category/grandangolo-pangea/

PT -- LARRY ROMANOFF -- Bloqueios de Informação – Como e Porquê? -- March 04, 2022

 

 

Bloqueios de Informação – Como e Porquê?

 

Por Larry Romanoff, Março 4, 2022

 

CHINESE   ENGLISH  PORTUGUESE

 

Estamos todos conscientes da capacidade que a Cabala Anglo-Zionista Internacional de Gangsters (ICG) tem para propagar a sua linha preferida da reportagem para cada ocasião, como acontece hoje com o conflito Rússia/Ucrânia. Geralmente, empregam o poder dos meios de comunicação social ocidental para sobrecarregar o público mundial com a versão aceite dos acontecimentos. Mas como é que os EUA e Israel e a ICG, conseguem evitar de maneira tão bem sucedida, a publicidade negativa das suas próprias aventuras em matéria de política externa? A maioria acreditaria, instintivamente, ter uma resposta fácil para esta pergunta, visto que parece depender simplesmente da censura dos meios de comunicação social, mas podemos estar enganados. Existem mais razões para um bloqueio de informação bem sucedido, do que aquilo que é óbvio à primeira vista.

 

Claro que a primeira parte, é o controlo quase universal de todos os meios de comunicação ocidentais por um punhado relativamente pequeno de indivíduos, todos eles judeus. O que inclui primeiro, os serviços noticiosos como a AP e a Reuters, depois os jornais e a maioria das revistas, estações e redes da rádio e de televisão mais conhecidas, praticamente toda a indústria editorial de livros, todos os meios de comunicação social e plataformas da Internet relacionadas, como a Wikipedia e a Google, “fact-checkers” como o desprezível Instituto Poynter, bem como 90% de Hollywood que inclui tanto filmes como programas de televisão. O controlo que efectuam sobre a informação, é quase total.

 

Mas esse controlo vai muito além da propriedade. Como exemplo, The Globe & Mail é (foi) um jornal respeitável há muito reconhecido como o jornal nacional do Canadá. Há alguns anos, o Globe publicou um artigo referindo em pormenor as atrocidades então cometidas contra os árabes pelos judeus da Palestina. O artigo não era inflamatório ou ideológico, mas simplesmente uma crónica precisa dos acontecimentos que os editores acreditavam que deveria ser levada ao conhecimento do mundo. Logo na manhã seguinte, toda a metade superior da primeira página do Globo trazia uma enorme fotografia de um soldado judeu a dar doces a uma criança supostamente palestiniana, com um texto a condizer. Não é necessário ter muita imaginação para saber o que aconteceu algures, atrás de uma porta fechada. A data era 1983 e, nos 39 anos a partir de então, o Globo não publicou um único artigo que depreciasse, quer judeus, quer Israel. Isto é controlo. Relatei esta parte e ainda mais, num artigo sobre Propaganda e os Meios de Comunicação - Estabelecer e Controlar a Narrativa. Talvez queira lê-lo. (1)

 

ROB SLANE -- When Fanatical Ideology Bumps up Against Stone Cold Reality

  When Fanatical Ideology Bumps up Against Stone Cold Reality 

 

 March 13, 2022  Rob Slane 

 

 

I have avoided writing anything on recent events in Ukraine thus far, partly because I wanted to see how events were panning out, partly because I still don’t quite understand how this all fits in with the two year Globalist PsyOp that ended abruptly on 24^th February – the same day as the Russian military operation started, as coincidence would have it – but mainly because the experience of trying to write rational analysis in the midst of propaganda that would have made the editors of Pravda blush is no easy task.

As a brief defence against those who will inevitably smear my attempts to analyse the context behind all this as somehow pro-Russian, let me ask them not to bother. I really don’t even understand the frame of reference, since I don’t view the world in the absurd black hat/white hat terms that lead to such jibes. And in any case, I am pro-God and pro-Truth, as well as being a patriotic Englishman who writes on such topics because he believes this once green and pleasant land is now run by terminally foolish clowns and Globalist ideologues who do not govern for the people but in the interests of others. I would also point out that I was writing about atrocities committed against Ukrainians years before it became fashionable to do so. However, unfortunately it seems I was supporting the wrong Ukrainians — the ones nobody cares about — in the Donbass, who have been killed, terrorised and forced to leave the country by their own brutal Government for eight years, with some even deliberately burned alive by the neo-Nazis formations that apparently don’t exist. Those caveats aside, let’s press on.

For most Westerners, it appears that the current conflict suddenly dropped from the sky one morning in February 2022. They woke up to hear about a Russian invasion, and without any prior knowledge or context, having been denied this for years by their so-called free press, simply accepted the narrative thrown at them that this invasion was utterly unprovoked — the brainchild of a madman who wishes to recreate Hammer and Sickle Land again.

None of this is remotely true. Whatever the actual reasons for invading at this particular time — and I don’t believe for one moment that we have the full picture yet — this conflict most certainly did not drop out of the sky or from the ravings of a lunatic on 24^th February 2022. No, it is part of a sequence of events that was set off years ago, particularly in 2014, which were clearly destined to reshape the world. As I wrote back in September 2014:

“I believe this crisis to be the defining crisis of the 21st Century so far. … It is also something that may well define the shape of the planet for the rest of the century — whether we are left with a unipolar world … or whether we see a new multipolar world emerging … It is in a very real sense the key battle between globalisation and national sovereignty.”

VIDEO -- Témoignage des Ukrainiens qui accueillent les Russes comme des libérateurs

 

 

Témoignage des Ukrainiens qui accueillent les Russes comme des libérateurs

Publié le 10 mars 2022

Interviews, Politique

mise à jour le 10/03/22

Voici une vidéo qui devrait faire réfléchir les Français sur leur soutien aux nazis ukrainiens qui maltraitent leur propre concitoyens. Des habitants du Donbass témoignent face caméra.

---

Soulagée par l’arrivée des soldats russes, une habitante du Donbass ne cache pas son soulagement après huit années de calvaire : « Nous avons souffert, le peuple a souffert ! Et maintenant ces gars [les Russes] sont arrivés. Ils sont polis, gentils, et on n’a pas peur. Vous comprenez, nous avions peur… »

La République populaire de Donetsk peut enfin avoir un avenir. Si pour les Français, c’est une guerre, pour les habitants de Donetsk c’est une libération : « Je n’ai pas vu mes enfants depuis huit ans, ni mes petits-enfants. Maintenant qu’ils [les Russes] viennent d’arriver, ils laissent les gens entrer, c’est plus facile. »

 

EN — LARRY ROMANOFF — Information Blockades – How and Why? — March 4, 2022

  

Information Blockades – How and Why?

By Larry Romanoff, March 4, 2022

 

 

 

We are all aware of the ability of the Anglo-Zionist International Cabal of Gangsters (ICG) to propagate the preferred story-line for every occasion, as with the Russia/Ukraine conflict today. Generally, they employ the power of the Western media to overwhelm the world’s publics with the accepted version of events. But how do the US and Israel, and the ICG, manage so well to avoid the negative publicity from their own foreign policy adventures? Most of us would instinctively believe we have the easy answer to this question, since it appears to hinge simply on media censorship, but we might be mistaken. There is more to a successful information blockade than is superficially obvious.

The first part of course is the nearly-universal control of all Western media by a relatively small handful of people, all Jews. This includes first the news services like AP and Reuters, then the newspapers plus most recognised magazines, radio and TV stations and networks, virtually the entire book publishing industry, all of the social media and related internet platforms like Wikipedia and Google, “fact-checkers” like the despicable Poynter Institute, as well as 90% of Hollywood which includes both motion pictures and television programs. Their control on information is nearly total.

But control goes far beyond ownership. As one example, The Globe & Mail is (was) a respectable broadsheet long recognised as Canada’s national newspaper. Some years ago, the Globe published an article detailing the atrocities then being committed against Arabs by the Jews in Palestine. The article wasn’t inflammatory or ideological, but simply an accurate chronicle of events the editors believed should be brought to the attention of the world. The very next morning, the entire top half of the front page of the Globe carried a huge photo of a Jewish soldier giving candy to a supposedly Palestinian child, with text to match. You don’t need an imagination to know what happened behind a closed door somewhere. The date was 1983 and, in the 39 years since then, the Globe hasn’t published a single article that was critical of either the Jews or of Israel. That's control. I have covered this part and more in an article on Propaganda and the Media - Establishing and Controlling the Narrative. You may care to read it. (1)