Putin’s Assessment of Trump at the G-20 Will Determine
Our Future
Putin’s Assessment of Trump at the G-20 Will Determine
Our Future
Paul Craig Roberts
The backdrops to the Putin/Trump meeting are the
aspirations of Israel and the neoconservatives. It is these aspirations that
drive US foreign policy.
What is Syria about? Why is Washington so focused on
overthrowing the elected president of Syria? What explains the sudden 21st
century appearance of “the Muslim threat”? How is Washington’s preoccupation
with “the Muslim threat” consistent with Washington’s wars against Saddam
Hussein, Gaddafi, and Assad, leaders who suppressed jihadism? What explains the
sudden appearance of “the Russian threat” which has been hyped into dangerous
Russophobia without any basis in fact?
The Muslim threat, the Russian threat, and the lies
used to destroy Iraq, Libya, and parts of Syria are all orchestrations to serve
Israeli and neoconservative aspirations.
Saddam Hussein was a secular leader whose job was to
sit on the anomosities of the Sunni and Shia and maintain a non-violent
political stability in Iraq. He, Assad, and Gaddafi suppressed the extremism
that leads to jihadism. Saddam had nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11, and
under his rule Iraq constituted a ZERO threat to the US. He had been a faithful
vassal and attacked Iran for Washington, which had hopes of using Iraq to
overthrow the Iranian government.
Removing secular leaders is what unleashes jihadism.
Washington unleashed Muslim terrorism by regime change that murdered secular
leaders and left countries in chaos.
Fomenting chaos in Iraq was the beginning for
spreading chaos into Syria and then Iran. Syria and Iran support Hezbollah, the
militia in southern Lebanon that has twice driven out the Israeli Army sent in
to occupy southern Lebanon so that Israel could appropriate the water
resources.
The neoconservatives’ wars against the Middle East
serve to remove the governments that provide military and financial support to
Hezbollah. By spreading jihadism closer to the Russian Federation, these wars
coincide perfectly with the US neoconservative policy of US World Hegemony. As
expressed by Paul Wolfowitz, US Undersecretary of Defense for Policy:
“Our first objective is to prevent the re-emergence of
a new rival, either on the territory of the former Soviet Union or elsewhere,
that poses a threat on the order of that posed formerly by the Soviet Union.
This is a dominant consideration underlying the new regional defense strategy
and requires that we endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a
region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to
generate global power.”
Israel wants Syria and Iran to join Iraq and Libya in
American-induced chaos so that Israel can steal the water in southern Lebanon.
If Syria and Iran are in chaos like Iraq and Libya, Hezbollah will not have the
military and financial support to withstand the Israeli military.
The neoconservatives have broader aims than Israel’s.
The neoconservatives want Syria and Iran in jihadist turmoil so that the
neoconservatives can send jihadism into the Russian Federation and into China.
China has a Muslim province that borders Kazakhstan. By causing internal
problems for Russia and China, the neoconservatives can reduce Russia and
China’s abilities to hinder US unilateralism.
That is what Syria is about. It is not about anything
else.
The “Muslim threat” appeared suddenly with the 9/11
attack on the WTC and Pentagon. The attack was instantly blamed on Muslims.
Although the US government maintained that it had no idea that such an attack
was in the works, the US government knew instantly who did it. Quite clearly,
it is impossible to know instantly who did an attack about which the government
had no idea. In what has become the hallmark of every “terrorist attack,” IDs
left at the scene conveniently identified the “terrorists.”
There are now 3,000 architects and engineers who put
their reputation on the line by challenging the official story of the collapse
of the WTC buildings. According to all known science, the official explanation
of the destruction of the 3 highrise WTC buildings is strickly impossible.
There is endless evidence online provided not by ignorant presstitutes,
conspiracy theorists, and lying politicians, but by real experts. Just go to
the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth website, to the Firefighters and
First responders for 9/11 Truth website, to the Pilots for 9/11 Truth website.
Research what some foreign government officials have to say about the absurd
story told by the US government. That any percentage of the US population
believes the obvious false official 9/11 story is proof of the total failure of
education in America. Much of the population is incapable of thought. People
simply accept whatever the government tells them regardless of the absurdity of
the explanation.
Where did the alleged “Muslim threat” come from? What
produced it? 9/11 happened before Washington destroyed in whole or part seven
Muslim countries, killing, maiming, orphaning, and displacing millions of
Muslims who are now overrunning Washington’s vassal states in Europe. Such wars
on innocents could produce terrorists, but 9/11 was prior to Washington’s wars
against Muslims.
Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda were Washington’s allies
against the Soviets in Afghanistan. Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda most certainly did
not have the inside information and inside connections to outwit all 17 US intelligence
agencies, the National Security Council, all intelligence agencies of
Washington’s NATO vassals and Mossad, and airport security four times in the
same hour on the same morning.
Moreover, in the last video attributed to bin Laden by
independent experts, bin Laden said he had no motive for any such attack and
had nothing to do with it. Generally speaking, real terrorists claim
responsibility whether they did it or not in order to build the movement by
showing its capability. It makes no sense that “the mastermind” allegedly
determined to overthrow the West would disavow the greatest humiliation ever
inflicted on a major power. The United States was completely humiliated by its
impotence against a handful of Muslims with nothing but box cutters. This humiliation
is a world record that will stand forever. It is impossible that the alleged
terrorist, bin Laden, would repudiate such an accomplishment.
This fact alone proves that Osama bin Laden and
Al-Qaeda had nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11.
Anyone who believes the official 9/11 story, like
anyone who believes Oswald killed JFK, like anyone who still believes that
Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and Al-Qaeda connections, that
Assad used chemical weapons, who believes the Gulf of Tonkin lie, who believes
that Sirhan Sirhan killed RFK, that Russia invaded Ukraine, etc., is too far
gone to ever be rescued from The Matrix in which they live.
I do not know if the insouciance and gullibility of
peoples in the West extends into Latin American, Africa, and Asia. Some of the
people in Venezuela, Ecuador, and Bolivia, whose governments are slated for
regime change by Washington, must be aware that they are not in control of
their own fate. But how widely spread is awareness of Washington’s lust for
world hegemony? The only signs of awareness are the initial and limited
agreements between Russia and China.
To this day, not a single European government has made
the connection between Washington’s wars, supported by Europe, and the millions
of refugees from Washington’s wars that are overrunning Europe, intent on
collecting welfare from European peoples while raping European women. We hear
all sorts of complaints about the refugees, but never is a connection made
between the refugees and Washington’s European supported wars.
Washington so successfully portrayed itself during the
Cold War as peace, justice, and truth astriding the white horse that the world
cannot see Satan sitting in the saddle.
Now that Washington’s 16 years of inhumane war against
Muslim populations have destroyed the lives of millions of peoples, why aren’t
there 9/11s every day? Instead are there only a few alleged terror attacks
carried out by individuals, which appear to many to be orchestrated false flag
events, such as individuals running over people with trucks in France and
England, shooting up a French deli and magazine office. But nothing in the US,
“the Great Satan.” Very suspicious.
The orchestrated event of 9/11 was the
neoconservative’s “New Pearl Harbor” that provided the excuse for wars that
advanced their purpose and Israel’s. It was the neoconservatives themselves who
said that they needed a “new Pearl Harbor” in order to begin their wars in the
Middle East.
Why don’t Americans and Europeans know this? The
answer is because the US and Europe do not have independent medias. They have
presstitutes.
Washington created “the Russian threat” when the Obama
regime’s frameup of Assad on his alleged use of chemical weapons failed. The UK
PM David Cameron pledged Great Britain’s cover for Washington’s invasion of
Syria, but the UK Parliament voted no. No more UK coverups for Washington’s war
crimes, said the Parliament. Russia stepped in and said, no need for more war.
We have an agreement with Syria. We are going to collect all chemical weapons
and turn them over to the US for destruction. The US is probably using these
chemical weapons turned over by naive Russians for the false flag chemical
attacks in Syria.
Stymied in their war aims against Syria, the
neoconservatives turned with fury against Russia. How dare the insignificent
Russians get in the way of the exceptional, indispensable people! We will teach
Russians a lesson! Washington unleashed on the democratically elected
government of Ukraine the US-financed NGOs in the amount of $5 billion
according to Assistant Secretary of State neoconservative Victoria
Nuland. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2fYcHLouXY
Not realizing its vulnerability, Russia was focused on
the Sochi Olympics and suddenly found that Ukraine had undergone a US coup and
was committing violence against the Russian populations in Ukraine. Previously
in history Soviet leaders had assigned Russia provinces to the Ukrainian Soviet
Socialist Republic of the USSR. These Russians faced with violence by the
neo-Nazi government installed in Kiev by Washington demanded to be reunited
with Russia from whence they had come.
Russia agreed to take back Crimea because of the
Russian Black Sea Naval Base, but refused the other Russian areas, Donetsk and
Luhansk. Hoping against all rationality to convince Europe that Russia was
non-aggresive, Russia refused the Russian breakaway republics and left them to
the mercy of the Kiev neo-Nazis that continue to attack them in violation of
the agreements.
The Russian government’s tolerance for provocations
and insults makes the Russian government look like a weakling to the American
neoconservatives, who continue to demonize Russia and its president and to press
for more sanctions and more bases on Russia’s borders. Prior to his meeting
with Putin, Trump, according to the BBC, called “on Russia to stop
‘destabilising’ Ukraine and other countries, and ‘join the community of
responsible nations.’” How is that for standing truth on its head?
The Russian desire for Western acceptance could end up
compromising Russia’s sovereignty. Washington is figuring out how much
sovereignty Russia will give up in exchange for being granted acceptance by the
West.
The Russians are also endangered by their belief that
Muslim terrorism is a world threat. It is a delusion for the Russian government
to think they can reach an agreement with Washington to fight terrorism
jointly. The Russians simply cannot accept that terrorism is Washington’s
weapon directed against them.
The only reason Muslim terrorism exists is that
Washington created it. Washington first used jihadism against the Soviet army
in Afghanistan. Then against Gaddafi in Libya. Then when Obama’s plan to invade
Syria on the trumped-up chemical weapons charge was blocked by the UK
Parliament and Russia, Obama sent ISIS to overthrow Assad. General Flynn, who
was the director of the US Defense Intelligence Agency stated this
matter-of-factly on Al Jazeera. Flynn said it was a “willful decision” of the
Obama administration to send ISIS to overthrow Assad. This is why Russia’s
hopes of a common front against ISIS never made any sense.
Jihadism is Washington’s best weapon with which to
destabilize Russia. Why would Washington help Russia to defeat this weapon?
There is so much fake news and disinformation spread
in the Western media that it even affects the Russians, perhaps even the
Chinese.
Even Western analysts who reject the official Syria
story still buy into the lie that Assad is a dictator.
When Putin meets with Trump, Putin will have to assess
whether Trump is a real president or just another front man for the powerful
interest groups that run Washington’s empire.
If Putin concludes that Trump is merely a front man,
then Putin has no alternative but to prepare for war.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.