Trump Now a Captive of the Deep State
Trump Now A Captive Of The Deep State
Paul Craig Roberts
When the gullible and insouciant American public and the presstitutes who
participate in the deceptions permitted the Deep State to get away with the
fairy tale that a few Saudi Arabians under the direction of Osama bin Laden,
but without the support of any government or intelligence agency, were able to
outwit the entirety of the Western Alliance and Israel’s Mossad and deliver the
greatest humiliation in history to “the world’s only superpower” by making the
entirety of the US government dysfunctional on September 11, 2001, Washington
learned that it could get away with anything, any illegal and treasonous act,
any lie. The gullible Western populations would believe anything that they were
told.
Not only insouciant Americans, but much of the world accepts any statement
out of Washington as the truth despite the evidence. If Washington said it,
Washington’s vassals in Germany, France, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand,
Netherlands, Belgium, and Japan assent to the obvious lie as if it were the
obvious truth. So do the CIA purchased media of these vassal states, a
collection of whores who prefer CIA subsidies to truth.
When Obama inherited the Deep State’s agenda from George W. Bush, he set up
Syria’s Assad for regime change by repeating for many months that if Assad used
chemical weapons in the “civil war” that Washington had sent ISIS to conduct,
Assad would have crossed the “Red Line” that Obama had drawn and would, as the
consequence, face an invasion by the US military, just as Iraq had been invaded
based on Washington’s lie about “weapons of mass destruction.”
Having burnt this idea into the feeble minds of the Western populations,
Obama then arranged for a chemical weapon to be exploded in Syria and blamed it
on Assad. Thus, the Red Line had been crossed, the insouciant West was told,
and America would now invade.
The UK prime minister, the usual piece of Washington-owned garbage, rushed
to the support of the American invasion, promising British support. But the
British Parliament voted NO. The MPs said that the UK was not going to support
another American war crime justified by obvious lies. Only in Britain does democracy
still have any teeth, as we saw a second time with the Brexit vote. All the
rest of the West lives in vassalage and slavery.
The Russian government also took a firm stand, admitting that Russia
stupidly trusted America in Libya, but no more. We, said the Russians, will
ourselves remove any and all chemical weapons from Syria and turn them over to
Western “civilization” to be destroyed, which the Russians did.
What did Western “civilization” do with the weapons? They gave some of them
to ISIS. This gave Washington a second chance to accuse Assad of using chemical
weapons “against his own people.”
And so Washington has rolled out this hoax a second time. During a Syrian
air force attack on an ISIS position, a chemical weapon exploded, or so it is
alleged. Instantly Washington said that Assad had used “Sarin gas against his
own people.” Trump was shown photos of dead babies and stupidly ordered a US
military strike against Syria.
This was the first time that Washington had engaged in an unambigious war
crime without any cover. Trump had no UN
resolution, not even one that could be stood on its head as in Libya. Trump had
no NATO participation, no George W. Bush “coalition of the willing” to give
cover to the war crime with the support of other governments.
There are no skirts for Trump to hid behind. He stupidly let himself be
pushed into commiting an unambigious war crime.
Now all his opponents—the Deep State, the military/security complex, the
CIA, the Hillary Democrats, the warmonger Republicans—have the New White House
Fool under their control. If Trump doesn’t do as they want, they will impeach
him for his war crime.
Meanwhile the risk of war with the Russian/Chinese/Iranian/Syrian alliance
grows closer. The US shows every intention of provoking this war. Washington
has imposed sanctions on 271 employees of Syria’s Scientific Studies and
Research Center for, in Washington’s lying words, responsibility “for
developing and producing non-conventional weapons and the means to deliver
them.”
In order to make this false charge stick, Washington prevented any
investigation whatsoever into the facts of the alleged chemical weapon
associated by Western propaganda, not by any known fact, with a Syrian air
attack on ISIS. If Washington is so certain that Syria is responsible, why does
Washington block an investigation? If Washington is right, an investigation
would prove Washington’s case. But as Washington is again lying through its
teeth, an investigation would prove the contrary. And that is what Washington
fears and is the reason Washington blocked an investigation.
Why do Western peoples believe the US government, a well proven liar, who
blocks an investigation and asserts that everyone must believe Washington or
else be put on a list of Russian agents?
Here is the lie, the raw propaganda, that the US government has no qualms
about issuing:https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/sm0056.aspx It comes from the US Department of the Treasury in which I once served
honorably. But honor no longer exists in the US Treasury.
Are Western populations intelligent enough to understand that the only
reason for Washington to block an investigation of the alleged use by Syria of
a chemical weapon is that the facts clearly do not support Washington’s lie? No, they are not.
Theodore Postol, a scientist at MIT, has concluded from his investigation
that the chemical weapon was not dropped from the air but was set off on the
ground and that it was not Sarin gas as Sarin lingers and the alleged aid
workers who were immediately on the scene were unprotected by gloves or masks
or by anything. If the gas were Sarin, they would be dead also.
The Russian explanation is that the Syrian air force attack hit a storage
facility, conveniently arranged by Washington, that contained chemical weapons.
I have seen reports that Washington, or Washington’s vassals such as Saudi
Arabia, have provided ISIS with chemical weapons. President Putin of Russia
says the reason Washington has delivered chemical weapons to ISIS is that there
can be more orchestrated instances of their use that can be blamed on Assad.
I think I can say in complete confidence that this is what is happening:
Washington intends to wear Russia down with orchestrated chemical attack after
chemical attack, portraying Russia as an inhuman defender of Assad’s alleged
chemical attacks, in order to more thoroughly isolate Russia and in order to
provoke opposition to Putin’s government, especially among the US and German
financed NGOs that Russia stupidly permits to operate in Russia and in the
Russian media. Washington’s goal is to force by the weight of world opinion
Putin to abandon Assad to Washington.
US Secretary of State Tillerson, another gigantic disappointment to those
who hoped for peaceful relations between the US and Russia/China/Iran/Syria,
has said that the US still intends regime change in Syria. Tillerson has
advised Russia to get out of Washington’s way and to “consider carefully their
support for Bashar al-Assad.”
Russia cannot abandon Assad, because if Syria falls to Washington, Iran
will be next, and then the Washington-financed jihadists will be set upon the
Muslim populations of the Russian Federation and China.
This is Washington’s game plan. I am certain Putin is aware of it, and I
think the Chinese are, despite their inordinate focus on making money.
The questions before us could not be any clearer: Will Russia and China
break and give in to Washington? If not, will Washington become a good world
citizen for the first time in America’s history, or will Washington issue more
threats, thereby convincing Russia and China that their alternative is to wait
for Washington’s preemptive nuclear strike or deliver one themselves?
This is the only question that the world faces that is worth our attention.
I spent a quarter century in Washington. The evil that is in control there at
the present time is unprecedented. I have never seen anything like it.
Can the world survive the evil that is concentrated in Washington, evil
that has the support of the governments of the Western world?
No comments:
Post a Comment