Part 3 – GM Seed and Depopulation
By Larry Romanoff
Henry Kissinger: “Who controls the food supply, controls the people.”
Introduction
The debate around GMOs is one of the most polarised in modern society. Concerns about corporate power, lack of transparency, and potential long-term biological risks are shared by a significant portion of the global public. One of the major debates is about the labeling of GM food. In a situation where the dangers could be many and the potential for misuse is admittedly extreme, the fierce corporate opposition to labeling is seen as highly suspicious.
Big Agra companies are heavily pushing the acceptance of GM seeds and food but are facing enormous public resistance, and yet they are insistent that no labels be legislated so that consumers will never know their food contains genetically-modified organisms. Why are the Big Agra companies so adamant that the public should not be informed of the GM content of their food? The concern is that if they are so intent on secrecy, it can be only because they have something to hide. What are they hiding?
Dismissing this as a simple fear of market rejection is insufficient. When an entity, particularly one with vast resources, fights transparency with such ferocity, it suggests the hidden information is not merely inconvenient, but potentially catastrophic to their core enterprise. The secrecy may be protecting a reality that, if exposed, would invalidate the entire justification for their products and open them up to existential liability. Perhaps the secrecy is not just about hiding from consumers but about maintaining a fraudulent consensus with regulators.
For example, the entire regulatory framework for GMOs is based on the concept of “substantial equivalence”—the idea that a GM crop is not significantly different from its non-GM counterpart and therefore does not require identification. But what if this foundational principle proves to be a scientific fiction and a legal fraud? Mandatory labeling would blow this premise apart. Another serious speculation revolves around potential health effects. The concern is not necessarily about a dramatic, acute toxin, but a subtle, chronic health issue. The industry’s secrecy might be a pre-emptive block against this very research. They are not hiding a single “smoking gun,” but preventing the scientific community from even looking for the bullet holes.
Whatever the underlying cause, we instinctively suspect there is something larger at play. The extreme aversion to transparency appears to be a defensive perimeter around the core value and legal foundation of the entire agro-biotech industry. We need to think here: This is not about legal liability. That premise would have to assume the Big Agra companies know they are producing something profitable but potentially dangerous to humans, the ecology and to nature, and they want to hide the truth while they amass profits. But this argument does not make logical sense. If this were simply a sincere effort to create new food, but perhaps dangerous to the environment, they would not be so secretive about public labeling. There is something else happening here. The intense opposition to GM labeling suggests there are deeper, structural reasons tied to the core business model of agricultural biotechnology firms. The evidence indicates that the secrecy is not primarily about hiding a specific danger, but about protecting a revolutionary and highly profitable business model that is inherently difficult to maintain in a transparent system.
Eighty percent of soy and forty percent of corn is genetically modified. GM products are here, but no regulator required anyone to tell us. Food packagers are not required to disclose if a GM ingredient is present in their products. If genetic modification is completely safe, there should be no objection to a labeling requirement. Source
The conflict between technology and agricultural tradition is real, but that is a different issue. The potential legal liabilities are also a different issue, and so is environmental damage. The “farmer slavery” issue is real, but it is also unrelated. The primary – and very real issue – is the secrecy with the consumer public. The Big Agra firms have invested billions in lobbying and in lawsuits to prevent GM labels or related public information. But again, the answer to public fear or rejection is education, not legislated secrecy. There is something very serious being hidden here, something not obvious, and something of critical importance to the Big Agra firms. Why don’t they want people to know they are eating genetically-modified food? It is not to avoid a “comparison” with other foods. The prolonged and intense drive for secrecy protected by legislation, cannot have an innocent agenda. There is something happening here that is not right.
In part, we must recognise that their goal is ubiquity, not choice. The business model of patented agricultural technology is not based on being one option among many in the marketplace. Its profitability and very survival depend on achieving ubiquity. It must become the default, the standard invisible background of the entire food system. This is why they don’t pursue “education”; they don’t want to convince a wary public to choose their product; they need to make the public’s choice irrelevant. Labeling would be the “Kill-Switch”. In part, they are hiding the fact that their entire enterprise depends on removing your ability to choose what is in your food. The secrecy is the primary mechanism for enforcing a technological monopoly on the global food supply. But this understanding doesn’t expose the real issues and still doesn’t tell us what we need to know.
We need to recognise that GM food technology is not being offered as a new product for public consideration. It is being imposed in a way that will inevitably give the Big Agra firms control over the entire food system. This is definitely an effort by a small group to obtain more or less full control over humanity’s food system. This is not merely about corporate profit. A small group of companies might have ambitions for trillions of dollars in profit without visions of controlling the entire world’s food supply. This is not so much about corporate profits as about the eventual control of the food chain from seed to supermarket. Now, who wants to do this, and why?
The “who” is not a single company, but a network of large corporations (and wealthy individuals) that control different segments of the food chain, often working in a complementary fashion. This involves companies – the intermediaries, the wholesalers, exporters, who (according to the WHO) already control most of the international food trade. Biotechnology and seed giants have created an integrated platform controlling patented seeds and agro-chemicals. Commodity traders and processors dominate global grain trade, storage, and processing. A few large firms dominate meat packing, flour milling, and oil pressing.
The illusion of choice.
Retail superpowers extend control backward into production by specifying seeds, fertilisers, and farming methods, dictating terms from the very beginning of the chain. This is a coordinated effort to engineer a food system where a few players are not just participants but the architects and permanent governors of the global food supply. The resistance to labeling is a logical part of this strategy; transparency and consumer choice are direct threats to a model built on ubiquity, dependency, and secrecy.
It should be clear that this “small network of large corporations” clearly has the ability, – and obviously the ambition – to eventually control more or less the entire world’s food supply chain from seed to supermarket. But ambitions of this magnitude are unheard of. We are not speaking here of total control of one agricultural segment – like dairy, in one country. The ambition clearly seems to be control of the food supply chain of the entire world – but by providing only GM food, and the secrecy seems to emanate from this. No group of companies would nurture such a grand ambition without a higher purpose. I would remind readers of Henry Kissinger’s words that “Who controls the food supply, controls the people.” If this vast program succeeds, and produces control of the world’s food supply chain, it will also of its own accord give these same firms total control over the world’s people. There is no way to avoid this conclusion. And this needn’t be a “conspiracy” in the sense that these firms gathered in a dark room with a secret handshake, planning to take over the world.
Free PDF NSSM-200
We must think about the implications of controlling the global food supply, connecting corporate ambition to a broader geopolitical strategy, and thinking of Kissinger’s famous quote. This isn’t just about profit; it’s about power over humanity itself. We need to move beyond conventional business analysis, to a systemic shift where food becomes a tool for control rather than a commodity. The logical endpoint of monopolising the food chain is the ability to influence – and to control – nations and populations. The part that is missing from our analysis is related to the control of humanity’s food supply which implies control of humanity.
The logical and unsettling end of this line of analysis forms a picture that transcends corporate avarice and enters the realm of geopolitical and civilisational strategy. When ambition shifts from market dominance in one food sector to the architecture of the global food system itself, the motive must be commensurate with the scale. The “higher purpose” is the conversion of food – the fundamental basis of human survival – from a common good into a leverage point for ultimate geopolitical and social control. We are moving from profit to control of the human condition. The “missing something” is the realisation that total control of the food supply is not an end in itself, but a means to an end.
That end is the power to dictate terms to nations and populations, and potentially to control the population size – individually, by nation. Henry Kissinger’s 1970s National Security Study Memorandum 200 explicitly outlined the use of food as a “national power tool” to influence population growth and control the political trajectories of developing nations.In that same document, he clearly stated that depopulation (perhaps using famine and starvation) was a main pillar in the Jews’ US foreign policy. Quote: ”Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world, because the US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries.” (Henry Kissinger, NSSM 200; Nov. 26, 1975.)
The model being built by this network of corporations is the perfect, privatised implementation of this doctrine. It would also obviously have the power to reduce (or even eliminate) populations. This is the engineering of dependency. Humanity becomes dependent on a corporate consortium for the very calories needed to live. This is a level of power that makes monopoly profits look like a trivial side-effect.
This final point resolves the intense drive for secrecy. It is not merely about hiding an ingredient. The secrecy is about preventing resistance. If the public understood that the issue was not “one product versus another” but “a free, diverse food system versus a centrally controlled, proprietary one,” the resistance would be existential and overwhelming. The corporate network cannot allow this. They are hiding the fact that the “Public Good” narrative is a facade, marketing their technology as necessary to “feed the world.” The secrecy ensures that the public cannot easily discover that the primary outcome has been the consolidation of control and the creation of dependencies, not the liberation of global food security.
We are no longer analysing a business strategy but a slow-motion, non-military conquest of the most critical infrastructure on Earth. The ambition is not just profit; it is the power that comes from holding the leash on human survival. The “small group of companies” are the vehicles, but the outcome they are building is a world where they are the unchallenged governors of the global food chain. And as Kissinger observed, whoever holds that position ultimately controls the people. The secrecy is essential because if humanity truly understood that this was the endgame, the project would be rejected outright. The fight over a simple label on a package is, in reality, a fight for human autonomy.
The “Official Narrative”
Monsanto now controls the largest share of the global GMO seed market. In turn, the US gov’t spends hundreds of millions annually funding the aerial spraying of Monsanto’s flagship herbicide Roundup, causing massive devastation to the environment and our health. According to the Denver Post in 2013, $277 billion dollars in subsidies were given to agribusiness giants like Cargill and Monsanto. In 2015 alone, Monsanto’s total lobbying expenses were $4,330,000… Source
Fed by the mass media, we are led to believe the reasons for Big Agra’s GM secrecy could include: a fear of widespread consumer rejection that could collapse the market for GM crops in which companies have invested billions. By this reasoning, the secrecy isn’t necessarily about hiding a specific dangerous trait, but about hiding the entire technology from the judgment of the marketplace. We are told these companies are simply protecting a business model which isn’t only about selling seeds and food, but an integrated agricultural system, and that labeling would cause consumers to reject the entire system, threatening not just seed sales but also the multi-billion-dollar herbicide market that goes with it. We are told the seed and food companies want to avoid scrutiny so as to avoid liability, that scrutiny opens the door to lawsuits and regulatory challenges. A further claim is that these companies maintain control over the narrative by keeping the GM status invisible. They can fund campaigns promoting the benefits of GMOs (e.g., “feeding the world,” “reducing pesticide use”) without the inconvenient counter-evidence of a label.
There exists widespread public opinion that the opposition to labeling is a sign of malicious intent. One of the plausible “hidden” agendas might be the well-documented, real-world issue of herbicide overuse and environmental damage. Another might be that the seed companies are hiding scientific uncertainty – the fact that the unintended consequences of gene splicing are not fully understood. Another is what we might term the “economic enslavement of farmers”, where the real “control” may be economic, not biological. Through patents and “Terminator Technology”, the seed companies have created a system where farmers must buy new seeds every year and cannot save them. This fundamentally changes agriculture from a self-sustaining practice to a corporate rental system. Secrecy helps prevent a public backlash against this model. In the end, we are told that the most credible explanation for the anti-labeling stance by the Big Agra firms is the protection of a lucrative business model from consumer choice. That they are hiding the product’s identity to avoid market rejection.
All of these explanations may have some validity, but the extreme aversion of Big Agra to public information cannot be explained by a fear of public rejection. That is too simple a response that explains nothing. The normal response to public fear or hesitancy is education, not secrecy. Big Agra is not insisting on secrecy to avoid frightening the public. And they are not doing it to avoid public knowledge of “farm slavery”, because that is an unrelated issue not of concern to food consumers, and in any case is already well-known. There is something else happening here, another reason for the secrecy. It is true that the Big Agra firms have invested huge sums into GM seed and food, and they would have done that for the expected potential profits. But that is no explanation for the secrecy. There is something large and serious here that is not obvious.
But Still, Why The Secrecy….?
If GMO’s are safe and healthy then why doesn’t Big Agra want them labeled? More and more, consumers are waking up to how crops with built in carcinogens cause cancer, DNA damage, and heart disease. There are many, many more people in America today with Alzheimer’s disease than there was before GMO’s were a part of our food source. This is much more than a coincidence. Source
There is much more to this story than outlined above, considerations deeply buried by Big Agra, governments, science and the media. We are still missing some important factors here. First, let’s separate the issues. Avoiding Scrutiny of the “Technology Package” is irrelevant. It is not NGOs or activists who are being kept in the dark, but the housewives who actually buy the food. And this is not about revealing the details of the farmers being slaves to Big Agra seeds and fertilisers. And it is not about protecting a large investment.
I wrote earlier that transparency in the form of GMO labels was a direct threat because it empowered consumers to reject the entire paradigm, not just one ingredient. That part is true, but it cannot be the core issue. The question we need to ask is “Why have GM seed and food at all?” These Big Agra firms could just as easily have created new non-GM strains of all these foods and promoted those. They could have accomplished the identical results with non-GM seed and food, just creating and patenting new varieties and pushing for a monopoly. Plant cross-breeding technology is at an apex in terms of science. If we want a strain of tomatoes with a higher concentration of a particular vitamin, that is not difficult to produce by traditional methods. Then, there would be no public fear and the potential profits could have been the same. But these Big Agra companies chose to create GM varieties in labs, as opposed to non-GM varieties, and they are so desperate for secrecy they want identification of these foods prohibited by legislation. That is not a normal reaction of a normal company doing normal business. There is clearly something very wrong here, something else being hidden. The evidence points to a fundamental conflict where corporate strategy is driven by the fear of what would happen if the public’s right to know were fully realised.
What is your reaction to this? Why do you think the Big Agra companies deliberately chose to spend hundreds of billions of dollars to create GM varieties instead of “normal” cross-bred hybrid varieties which would accomplish the same thing at almost no cost?
Gene-Splicing
An international team of scientists has genetically engineered tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum) with a fungal bioluminescence system. Designing new biological features is more complex than merely moving genetic parts from one organism to another. Source
Gene-splicing is no longer difficult, and we can find numerous articles documenting the kinds of experiments that have taken place. In one case in Canada, a government department discovered an “anti-freeze” gene contained in the blood of fish living in Arctic waters, permitting them to survive in waters of sub-zero temperature. The scientists spliced this gene into Canadian wheat crops, permitting the wheat to withstand freezing temperatures without damage. Monsanto also forced these genes into tomatoes, resulting in the first GMO tomato. [1] An American research lab spliced the genes from fireflies into tobacco plants, producing a tobacco field that glowed in the dark. [2] [3] These examples may be harmless, but others are much less so. There is no shortage of documented experiments of labs inserting various pathogens into GM seed and almost everything else. Nobody today really knows what is out there.
Contraceptive Corn
The Silent GMO Sterilization of the Human Race. Mitch Hein, the president of Epicyte, claimed it was a possible solution to world “over-population. Source
In 2001 scientists at the Epicyte bio-lab in San Diego created a GM contraceptive corn, having discovered a rare class of human antibodies that attack sperm. Their researchers isolated the genes that regulate the manufacture of these antibodies and inserted them into corn plants, creating horticultural factories that make contraceptives. [4] [5] [6] [7] Shortly after the 2001 Epicyte press release, all discussion of the breakthrough vanished. The company was taken over by Biolex and nothing more was heard in any media about the development of spermicidal corn. University professors who published detailed treatises on this topic have had all publications deleted. Epicyte, DuPont and Syngenta (sponsors of the Svalbard Seed Vault) had a joint venture to share and use this technology. Silvia Ribeiro, of the NGO ETC Group, warned in a column in the Mexican daily La Jornada, that “The potential of spermicidal corn as a biological weapon is very high”. [8]
An article from 2005 confirms that researchers at Johns Hopkins University in the USA successfully developed a transgenic corn for contraceptive purposes, by isolating genes that produce antibodies which attack sperm, and then inserting those genes into corn DNA. The goal was for the corn to produce these anti-sperm antibodies, effectively making it an oral contraceptive. It seems that population control through sterility is one objective of GM food.
The ethical line between a medicinal product and a food is fundamental. The idea of a contraceptive being present in a staple food crop, potentially without the consumer’s knowledge, is a serious ethical breach. This is no longer speculation but a validated fear. The concern that GM technology could be used to create substances that secretly reduce populations by killing fertility is based on a proven scientific capability.
Let’s think about this. Scientists in the Epicyte bio-lab discovered a rare class of human antibodies that attack sperm. Okay. No problem there. Research scientists discover lots of things. But then these same scientists isolated the gene that attacks sperm and causes sterility, and they inserted them into corn plants, “creating horticultural factories that make contraceptives”. We have no problem with scientists making such a discovery, but you might ask yourself, “what would motivate these scientists to want to insert this sterilisation gene into GM corn?” Why would they even think of such a thing?” What possible motivation could they have, to want to make corn – a basic food in many countries – an agent of male sterilisation? And it is worth noting the choice of words in the official narrative: it says the scientists created plant factories that make contraceptives. But a contraceptive is usually something people use by choice when they don’t want to produce children. This GM corn is not a “contraceptive” in any normal sense, but instead a clandestine sterilisation agent. Syngenta or Bayer would surely not be advertising that they have a new corn that people can eat to avoid pregnancy. Instead, the corn would most likely be passed into the food supply with no warnings.
The point is that the scientists who created this, would have done so only with the specific intent of the corn being used as a sterilisation agent on a mass population basis. Nobody spends billions of dollars creating a product they don’t intend to use. Without that intent, they would never have conceived of the idea of splicing sterilising genes into GM corn. How do you avoid the conclusion that these people not only favor population control through clandestine sterilisation, but were actively pursuing precisely that goal? My real point is that depopulation of the world through sterilisation is not a conspiracy theory; there are many people in many dark places who are pursuing this goal. The GM spermicidal corn is only one of many such examples.
What do you think? Why did Epicyte, Biolex, DuPont and Syngenta spend billions of dollars to develop spermicidal corn? Do you think maybe they just had too much money and nothing better to do? Or do you think maybe they envisioned applications for it? And how would you explain the secrecy, where all information on the discovery suddenly seemed to disappear?
Cotton Seeds
This is the same reason GM seed companies are suddenly promoting the use of cotton seeds as a primary foodstuff for underdeveloped countries. Cotton seeds are toxic, containing a chemical called gossypol which is an effective male sterilant. [9] [10] The seed companies claim to have removed this toxin to a safe level, but there is no safe level for gossypol. Even very minute doses taken repeatedly (as when used for a basic food) will render an entire male population sterile. [11]
The information about gossypol’s confirmed contraceptive mechanism at the cellular level is well-documented and consistent across multiple scientific sources. The “standard narrative” of documented science claims that the contraceptive effect of gossypol is dose-dependent and reversible at low-to-moderate doses. I have one important observation to make about this. The science tells us that gossypol can cause sterility even when absorbed in minute doses, as when used as a basic food. But various “scientific authorities” apparently claim the effect is reversible – presumably with medical treatment. This is what we refer to as an “official narrative” that is superficially true but false in reality.
Consider this hypothesis: males in a nation have been consuming cotton seeds as a basic food for ten years and are all effectively sterile from the low-to-moderate doses of gossypol. So now we are going to reverse this effect. Well, that might be possible in a very rich Western country with too many doctors and a well-functioning universal health care system. But the countries where males are consuming cotton seeds as a basic food are not the rich Western countries with too many doctors and an excellent health care system. They are in the poorest countries with few doctors and a rickety health care system that has capacity only for the basics.
In a country like that, how, exactly, will you organise a program to un-sterilise all the males? Consider India with a population of 1.5 billion and a male population of around 750 million. Those men might have been consuming cotton seeds for a decade and are all effectively sterile. How, in such a poor country with few doctors and a barely-functioning health care system do we conduct a de-sterilisation reversal program for 750 million males? The truth is that we don’t, because we can’t. Such a program would be impossible. And that means that the males who have been rendered sterile would remain sterile.
To inflict cotton seeds as a basic food in poor countries would mean the permanent sterilisation of the entire male population, and that an entire race or ethnic group would disappear in only one generation. That is the difference between theory and real-life practicality. Can you tell me I’m wrong? The official narratives can never be trusted. Further, the people who are proposing the use of cotton seeds as a basic food for the poor countries are very aware of the most likely real-life results on the male population, but are burying this truth under the fairy tale of the contraceptive results being reversible. They know what they are doing, and it would be a serious mistake to assume otherwise.
Again, while scientific literature describes gossypol’s effects as reversible, this reversal requires medical infrastructure that doesn’t exist in the very countries being targeted for cottonseed food programs. This creates permanent, demographic-scale sterilisation under the guise of “creating protein for the poor”. Multiple authoritative sources clearly warn that long-term use of gossypol carries a risk of causing irreversible damage to testicular function, which means the “reversibility” is a potential outcome, not a certainty.
The simple analysis of the public health logistics is compelling. The scientific narrative of “reversibility” is predicated on a controlled environment that does not exist in the scenarios that would be encountered. Organising a medical program to treat 750 million men is an undertaking with no precedent in human history. It would require a colossal medical infrastructure, including specialists, diagnostics, and a vast supply chain for any required treatments. The countries most likely to rely on a novel, low-cost food source are often those with healthcare systems that are already strained and lack the capacity for such a monumental task. If a population consumes gossypol as a dietary staple for a decade, the chance of widespread, permanent infertility is high. The medical system would be tasked not with a simple “reversal,” but with treating a chronic infertility epidemic of staggering proportions.
In a real-world scenario where gossypol is introduced into the food supply of a large, developing population, the distinction between a “reversible” and “irreversible” effect becomes largely academic. The practical outcome would be the same: a permanent and devastating impact on male fertility for a significant portion of the generation that consumed it.
We need to think carefully about one more concern: If it is obvious to me that the reversal of male sterility would be logistically impossible in real life in poor countries, this fact would also be obvious to the so-called “scientists” who are recommending cotton seeds as a basic food. How do we escape the conclusion that their recommendation to use cotton seeds as a basic food is done with full knowledge of the potential permanent damage to the male population, and is therefore a deliberate attempt at population control by sterilisation? This argument is built on a chain of undeniable facts:
(1) Known Effect: The scientific community has documented, for decades, that gossypol is a potent male contraceptive that can cause irreversible sterility, especially with long-term consumption.
(2) Known Context: It is well-known that poor countries lack the sophisticated, large-scale healthcare infrastructure required to monitor, treat, and reverse such effects across millions of people.
The obvious conclusion (and the only conclusion) is that any scientist or policymaker advocating for the widespread consumption of cottonseed in such regions, while being aware of points 1 and 2, must be able to foresee the inevitable outcome: widespread, de facto permanent sterility. Therefore, the only logical conclusion is that the inevitable sterility is not an unforeseen side effect, but an intended outcome. This aligns perfectly with the historical and contemporary fears I have repeatedly expressed: that the consolidation of food, land, and resources is ultimately aimed at population control. I don’t see how you could argue otherwise.
To believe the promotion of cottonseed is benign, one must believe that the scientists and officials involved are either:
(A) Staggeringly incompetent in their failure to understand the practical implications of their own research, or
(B) Operating with a set of priorities where the goal is explicitly reducing populations. Given the high level of expertise involved, option A seems unlikely. This leaves option B as the most plausible explanation.
Military Conception and Application
In an earlier article titled “Genetically Modified Seeds: Conceived as a Weapon”, [12] I outlined some of the unspoken and deliberately hidden dangers in this area. I will quote here from that study:
If we were to ask about the origin of GM seeds, how the idea was conceived and developed, who did the research and who provided the funding, how would we reply? We might reasonably suggest that perhaps the concept originated in the Biology or Agricultural Department of some university, or that a government lab doing research on food supplies might have conceived and pursued the idea. Or, we might suggest a private company in the agricultural field was looking for more productive varieties of grains and stumbled on this process. We might suggest all those answers, but in each case we would be wrong. GM seed was conceived, promoted, researched and funded by the US Department of Defense – the American War Department. GM seed was never meant as a way to feed the hungry, but was instead conceived and developed as a weapon or, more precisely, as a weapons-delivery system. Genetically-Modified seed was never intended to support human life, but to eliminate it.
GM seed is neither more productive nor healthier than traditional heritage crops, and is far more expensive and destructive, but it presents almost irresistible military advantages against any nation that becomes dependent on this source of food grains. One is that the US can use it as a political weapon, refusing to supply seed to a disfavored nation, perhaps causing widespread famine and dislocation. The other is more sinister, in that many groups have experimented with gene-splicing technology, inserting unrelated (and lethal) DNA into various seeds.
The US Defense Department has invested huge sums in research directed to splicing lethal genes into these GM crop seeds, including smallpox, bird and swine flu viruses, coronaviruses, the plague, AIDS, EBOLA, and more. As a military weapon, such science is priceless. Why begin a shooting war when Monsanto or Cargill can sell rice, corn and soybeans that contain smallpox, H5N1, or the Plague? When the seed is harvested and passes into the nation’s food supply it could, within weeks, exterminate 50% or more of the population without firing a single shot. And this was precisely the reason GM seed was conceived and developed by the Americans. It is a weapon of war, designed and meant to deliver to a nation’s entire population a lethal virus or other disease, to literally exterminate an enemy with no risk to the aggressor.
Several years ago, researchers in Australia created a GM food-based mouse virus that killed 100% of its victims simply by inserting an interleukin gene that suppressed all immune responses to the virus. [13] To carry the lethality further, they inserted into the GM seed other proteins that worked to kill more than half of the mice that had been vaccinated against this particular virus. And that means scientists today can not only create a virus that will exterminate an entire population but can splice into that virus additional matter that will even defeat prior vaccinations.
This process is entirely military: in any attack on an enemy, the first military objective is what we call “defense suppression”. In other words, we first destroy an enemy’s ability to defend himself; then, we attack when he is helpless. And that is precisely the philosophy contained in these new lab viruses. They are not being created for civilian research; their function is entirely military, or at least directed to the population-control dreams of people like the WHO, the Rockefeller Foundation, and of course our Khazar Jewish banker friends in The City of London. Unwitting nations may one day be purchasing contaminated seed and literally paying seed companies for the food that will exterminate them.
It isn’t as if this clever knowledge is a secret, and in fact it hasn’t been a secret for a very long time. In a classified 1948 report by the Pentagon’s Committee on Biological Warfare, the main selling point was that “A gun or a bomb leaves no doubt that a deliberate attack has occurred. But if … an epidemic slashes across a crowded city, there is no way of knowing whether anyone attacked, much less who”, adding hopefully that “A significant portion of the human population within selected target areas may be killed or incapacitated” with only very small amounts of a pathogen. [14]
And let’s face the fact that there is no substantive difference between the Jewish-controlled US State Department deciding to insert lethal genes into GM seed and launching a bio-weapons attack on a country, and the Jewish-owned Monsanto or Cargill inserting the same lethal genes into GM seed as part of a nation’s food supply chain. The latter is easier by far and contains some deniability: “We didn’t know the seed was contaminated with the Bubonic Plague. No idea how that happened. How terrible.” But it is of considerable importance that all participants are reading from the same script and following the same agenda with the same inevitable result.
Population Reduction in the Third World
Spermicidal corn, cotton seeds, and military biological attacks are merely three examples of many in the depopulation agenda.
WHO Depopulation Program
Doctors in Kenya have accused UNICEF, the World Health Organization and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation of secretly trying to sterilise millions of women in Africa via a tetanus vaccine program. Source
I want to bring one related item to the attention of readers. This is something I have researched extensively, have written articles about, and can document with irrefutable evidence. First, the description of the issue:
During the early 1990s, the WHO had been overseeing massive tetanus vaccination campaigns in Nicaragua, Mexico, the Philippines, Tanzania, Nigeria, and other nations. All tell a similar story, one that almost beggars belief but with the facts too clear to refute. Tetanus is a disease whose onset we often associate with stepping on a rusty nail or some such event. It should be clear that men would be at least as likely, if not more likely, to encounter this circumstance than would women, and perhaps careless children more than adults, but the WHO vaccination program was directed only to females from 15 to 45 years of age – in other words, child-bearing ages. In Nicaragua, the targets were females from 12 to 49 years of age.
Also, a single tetanus shot is universally accepted as sufficient to provide protective duration of ten years or more, but the WHO inexplicably insisted on vaccinating these women five times within several months. Shortly after the initiation of these programs, concerns began to emerge about vaginal bleeding and spontaneous abortions and other complications arising exclusively within the vaccinated populations. On suspicion, a group in Mexico had the vaccination serum analysed and discovered it contained the Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) hormone. This hormone is critical to the female body during pregnancy. It causes the release of other hormones that prepare the uterine lining for the implantation of the fertilised egg. Without it, a woman’s body is unable to sustain a pregnancy and the fetus will be aborted. This hormone was injected into the subjects along with the tetanus serum, causing a female body to then recognise both as foreign agents and to develop antibodies to destroy either if they were to ever appear in the body in the future. [15]
Upon becoming pregnant, a woman’s body would fail to recognize hCG as a friend and would produce anti-hCG antibodies, the prior vaccination now inducing her body’s immune system to attack the hormone that is needed to bring an unborn child to term, preventing subsequent pregnancies by killing the hCG which is necessary to sustain them. This means each woman who received the WHO inoculation was vaccinated not only against tetanus but also against pregnancy. [16] [17]
The evidence for this is irrefutable. Much of it comes from the WHO’s own website, where they list many studies and progress reports that outline how the WHO spent 20 years and about $400 million (largely courtesy of Bill Gates) to develop what they called an “anti-fertility vaccine” based on hCG and using tetanus toxoid as the carrier. Here are a few examples of papers actually on the WHO website:
“Clinical profile and Toxicology Studies on Four Women Immunized with Pr-B-hCG-TT,” Contraception, February, 1976, pp. 253-268.
“Observations on the antigenicity and clinical effects of a candidate antipregnancy vaccine: B-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin linked to tetanus toxoid,” Fertility and Sterility, October 1980, pp. 328-335.
“Phase 1 Clinical Trials of a World Health Organisation Birth Control Vaccine,” The Lancet, 11 June 1988, pp. 1295-1298. “Vaccines for Fertility Regulation,” Chapter 11, pp. 177-198, Research in Human Reproduction, Biennial Report (1986-1987), WHO Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (WHO, Geneva 1988).
“Anti-hCG Vaccines are in Clinical Trials,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, Vol. 36, 1992, pp. 123-126.
The WHO inoculated approximately 150 million women in 52 countries with this vaccine, permanently sterilising the entire lot of them without their knowledge or consent. It was only when an enormous number of women in all countries experienced vaginal bleeding and miscarriages immediately after the vaccinations, that the hormone additive was discovered as the cause.
If that weren’t sufficiently evil, the WHO assumed that some significant number of the vaccine recipients would be pregnant when receiving the vaccine, and that this would necessarily result in a spontaneous abortion, but dismissed that as a kind of “collateral damage”. The same paper went on to state, “In addition to women being immunised inadvertently during an established pregnancy, fetuses could be exposed to potential teratological effects of immunisation …”. In other words, WHO staff would freely inoculate pregnant women; those embryos or fetuses not spontaneously aborting would experience pathological growth resulting in various undefined birth defects.
The WHO is not researching ‘reproductive health’, but reproductive impossibility, and their tetanus-hCG vaccine is not in any sense ‘regulating’ the fertility of women but rendering their fertility biologically impossible, which is not quite the same thing. Their own paper stated the vaccination likely “will cause an irreversible biological neutralization of hCG”, which means the permanent sterilisation of innocent women who agreed to receive tetanus shots.
Try to understand what this means: the WHO was for decades receiving hundreds of millions of dollars in funding for research and testing, to produce a vaccine that would make a woman’s immune system attack and destroy her own babies in the womb, a vaccine they would surreptitiously combine with a tetanus vaccination without informing the victims. To say their deceit was successful would be an understatement.
Upon the discovery of the hormone in the vaccine, Nigerian physicians reported WHO doctors telling them the hCG hormone “would have no effect on human reproduction”, statements they knew to be false. When this information reached the public, the WHO assumed an offensive and repugnant stand, mocking and ridiculing the nations that had performed the tests and revealed the contamination, condemning them as incompetent, having “unsuitable” testing laboratories, and using improper samples or procedures. WHO officials claimed these nations had “Not the right kind of lab to do the test. The labs know only how to test urine samples . . .”
When the discovery was made, many nations enacted immediate legal restraining orders against WHO and UNICEF vaccine programs. WHO and UNICEF officials said the “grave allegations” were “not backed up by evidence”, which was nonsense. UNICEF, USAID and the WHO refused to address the evidence like vaginal bleeding, miscarriages and spontaneous abortions. They also refused to discuss the reasons for a series of five closely-spaced vaccinations when one had always been sufficient, ignoring the content of their own published papers stating that multiple injections of a tetanus-hCG vaccine would be necessary for effective sterilisation.
When faced with documented results, WHO officials admitted the hormone did indeed exist “in small amounts” in “some” of the vaccine material, but that this was an inconsequential result of “accidental contamination”. Nobody at the WHO attempted to explain the source of the hCG hormone in sufficient volume to contaminate about 750 million doses of a vaccine, nor how that “contamination” could “accidentally” have inserted itself into all those vaccines. Anyone familiar with large-scale vaccine or drug manufacture knows that the process is mechanical and fully-automated, essentially a closed system. It is not possible in such an environment to introduce contaminants of any kind, unless done deliberately. And the amount of hCG necessary to contaminate 750 million doses of a vaccine would have to consist of tens of thousands of liters, hardly ‘small amounts’.
The Lancet reported that the US National Institute of Health supplied much of the hCG hormone for WHO experiments and testing. For the NIH to have submitted this amount of hormone to Canada, where Rothschild’s Connaught labs are located, would absolutely have attracted the attention of Canada’s customs officials and thus Canada’s national government, which has to mean that Canada was fully aware of what was happening, and why. Readers need to know that this WHO “anti-fertility” tetanus vaccine was created surreptitiously, was never declared, was never tested, and was never approved for use on humans. Rothschild’s Connaught labs created this vaccine, and obviously fully aware of the intended use. And manufactured it on such an immense scale – approximately 750 million doses – while ignoring all Canadian and international law. There is no way for Canada to avoid accusations of direct complicity in this immense human atrocity. Nor for Rothschild, either.
The WHO went silent for a while, but in 2015, Vatican Radio charged that the UN, WHO and UNICEF were again executing vast international programs of depopulating the earth by using vaccines to surreptitiously sterilise women in Third World countries, this time in Kenya. It stated that “Catholic Bishops in Kenya have been opposed to the nationwide Tetanus Vaccination Campaign targeting 2.3 million Kenyan women and girls of reproductive age between 15-49 years, terming the campaign a secret government plan to sterilise women and control population growth”. In May of 2018, it was reported that fertility-regulating vaccines were being used in India.
It is hardly a surprise that the Internet has been itself heavily “sterilised” of all articles and documents on this topic. In 2010 or even 2015, there were hundreds of articles on many websites documenting this travesty in much detail, but nearly all have either been deleted or the search engines now refuse to produce them.
Readers should note that this WHO vaccination travesty was entirely a Jewish project. It was the Rothschild-owned Sanofi-Connaught Labs in Canada that produced the vaccine, and the Jewish-controlled NIH in the US that supplied the female hormone – thousands of liters of it. As I’ve often mentioned elsewhere, the Western (Jewish) media are excessively fond of demonising Hitler, but Hitler didn’t sterilise 150 million Jewish women without their knowledge or consent. Yet Rothschild (a Jew) knowingly produced an unapproved vaccine to sterilise 150 million non-Jewish women without their knowledge, so where is the moral outrage against the Jews?
The above story is only one of many. Another would be the several infamous forced sterilisation programs the US (i.e., the Jewish-controlled State Department) inflicted on India some years back. The US refused to provide India with food aid during a crisis and impending famine, and would do so only on condition that the government would permit the sterilisation of the female population. USAID was the tool, [18] establishing thousands of sterilisation centers throughout the country, and forcibly (or at least against their will) sterilising more than 100 million Indian women. At another time, US President Lyndon Johnson exerted intense pressure on Indira Ghandi to implement a forcible sterilisation program for men, [19] with roughly the same result in terms of numbers of victims. [20]
I would note here too, that USAID under Reimert Ravenholt conducted forcible abortions and sterilisations on at least 100 million women in many undeveloped countries. Ravenholt even knowingly purchased the entire world supply of the infamous Dalkon Shield that killed its users rather than preventing pregnancy, and he did so AFTER the product had been universally condemned, and withdrawn from sale. [21] [22]. He distributed them all in third-world countries, with no record of the death toll. As well, it is documented that millions of victims of USAID’s abortion policy were sterilised, either deliberately or accidentally, and many millions died. No records were kept of the injuries and deaths. Read: USAID and Abortion – A Brief History [23] And yet the Jewish Hasbara propaganda machine works overtime to tell us that Ravenholt operated programs on “family planning” and “reproductive health”. And the Jews tell us, “Few people have had a more positive impact on the developing world than Reimert Ravenholt”. [24] What do you think? Do you agree with that assessment?
All this is proof that the prospect of worldwide population control through forcible or surreptitious sterilisation is not a conspiracy theory but a sound conclusion based on large amounts of evidence. Spermicidal GM corn and gossypol from cotton seeds are only a small part of this overall picture. ZIKA [25] was the same; the major result of releasing the ZIKA virus was to force many Latin American countries to relax or eliminate their restrictions on casual abortion. The COVID vaccines were similar: We were assured the RNA remained in the injected muscle, but studies quickly revealed this to be untrue, and that the RNA spontaneously migrated to the reproductive organs of both males and females, with severely detrimental effects on reproduction. COVID was a masterpiece of population reduction. For one thing, it is only after years of attempts that a couple realise they might be unable to conceive a child and, with the passage of time, linking that defect to Pfizer’s “vaccine” proves impossible.
If you suspect my COVID reference may be unwarranted in this context, I suggest you read this article on Oxitech’s “Flying Syringes”, and try to connect the dots. [26]
I would urge readers to keep in mind that all US foreign policy is in the hands of the Jews controlling the State Department; the Americans are merely the “Gentile front” doing the bidding of their Jewish masters and acting as “The Bankers’ Private Army”. I would also remind readers that it is beyond dispute that abortion, sterilisation, and worldwide population reduction are primary Jewish “values”. I would also remind readers that it is only the Gentile (non-Jewish) populations that are subject to these depopulation measures. The WHO and UNICEF are not conducting their “tetanus vaccination” programs in Israel. Do you think we should ask why not?
GM seed and food would qualify as a conspiracy, but this “conspiracy” is not in a secret meeting; it is in the plain sight of a systemic, technological, and economic evolution whose endgame is the total financialisation and control of life itself. In the previous article in this series, I noted that the Jews were doing the same with water – primarily Jewish-owned Nestlé but others as well – slowly taking control of the world’s fresh water supplies and selling it at a high price. The former President of Nestlé said plainly that water was not a human right, but a product that should be owned, priced, and sold – by the Jews, of course.
The Doomsday Seed Vault at Svalbard
The Doomsday Seed Vault at Svalbard. Source
Much of the major funding (and/or participation and management) of the Svalbard Seed Vault include Bayer Crop Science, the Rockefeller Foundation, Monsanto, DuPont, Bill Gates, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, the World Bank, the WHO, and CGIAR. I am not the only person to have noticed that some of the world’s major population-reduction enthusiasts are in control of this seed bank. When so many of these people gather in one place for one purpose, there is ample reason for more than mild suspicion. [27] [28]
The promoters and financiers of this venture are the same people who control the world’s GM seeds and who have been among the most outspoken proponents of drastically reducing the world’s population: the Rockefeller and Gates Foundations, Syngenta, DuPont, Monsanto and CGIAR. These are the same people who are actively destroying crop diversity all over the planet. Why would they suddenly get religion and decide to save in Norway the same seeds they are destroying everywhere else? If we look back at the US hijacking of Iraq, we find the opposite of “crop diversity”. Order 81 of Paul Bremer’s so-called “provisional orders” stipulates that all Iraqi farmers must use Monsanto’s GM seed for all crops planted in the country, with the use of any heritage Iraqi seed stock now totally prohibited. [29] Why do you suppose they would have done that? Use your imagination. Seed gene banks in Afghanistan and Iraq were destroyed by the US military – by these same people, none of which was backed up in Svalbard and are now lost forever. Something similar is true for many other countries. This then begs the question of why, if Monsanto et al are so desirous to protect the sacred heritage of all plant life everywhere, are they in fact and in real life destroying that same diversity in so many nations by bribery, coercion, and extortion – and by military force when necessary.
The seeds are stored inside the vault at temperatures of around −18°C (−0.4°F). And the permafrost and thick rock surrounding the bunker ensure that the samples will remain frozen, even if power is lost. Source
Many people who have researched this subject of the seed vault, have arrived at the same conclusion as mine, that the vault was created as a storehouse for lethal biological pathogens, the DNA of which can be combined with GM seed and unleashed anywhere with the help of these same seed companies. No other use would explain the list of participants or the need for the remote location and virtually nuclear-proof security. Engdahl asked, “Is it a coincidence that these same [population-reduction] organisations, from Norway to the Rockefeller Foundation to the World Bank are also involved in the Svalbard seed bank project?” [30] [31]
Epilogue
I apologise to readers for the length of this article. I felt a need to demonstrate that forcible and surreptitious population control and reduction are not a conspiracy theory but are real and ubiquitous. This was necessary, as evidence that GM seed and food are inextricably linked to this same agenda. GM seed is merely the latest weapon against human reproduction, much less costly than the vaccination programs of the WHO, UNICEF, USAID and others, and much less dangerous than military biological attacks. GM programs are ideal because the victim country pays for the surreptitious sterilisation of its own population. The method is also much more effective, since it uses existing food distribution channels and, with luck, can reach every person in a country.
But we are dealing with a kind of communications gap: how to convey a complex, systemic threat without triggering dismissal as conspiracy theory.
It required many months of research and self-education to assemble all this information and background, to assess and analyse, and to finally realise the scope and power, and the objectives, of the entities behind this. I invested months connecting dots across agriculture, finance, and geopolitics, arriving at a conclusion that feels both obvious and impossible to share. The problem is that it is almost impossible to communicate a full understanding of this huge issue to an average person. The public would almost require a full one-semester university course to fully grasp all the pieces of this entire picture. Any attempt to communicate it in a brief article would likely make it sound like a totally-deranged conspiracy theory. “The boy who cried ‘wolf'”, or “The sky is falling”. And yet the world needs to know this, and to consider the implications for self-preservation.
Literally months were spent piecing together disparate elements from trade policy, agricultural contracts, financialisation, biotechnology, and geopolitical strategy, and these are not reducible to a soundbite. The pattern becomes clear only when all the pieces are assembled, and the assembly requires time and intellectual effort. However, the fact that something is difficult to communicate does not make it any less true.
The system is complex and diffuse, with its logic embedded across multiple, seemingly unrelated fields. Its actions appear deniable because its components can be explained away in isolation (“market efficiency,” ” advanced science”). Being forced to compress this sprawling reality into a simple, digestible narrative is extraordinarily difficult because in doing so, the argument loses its nuanced, evidence-based foundation and becomes vulnerable to being dismissed as a “conspiracy theory”. This is not an accident; it is a feature of the system; the complexity itself acts as a shield.
I have focused here on GM seed and food, but this same model is being applied to housing, agricultural land, education, water, meat production, all foodstuffs, finance, and more. It is simply a matter of connecting the dots, of realizing the agenda and methods are consistent through all those sectors. I spent some time (and space) on the prospects of depopulation, again with the focus on GM seed, but depopulation is being systematically executed by many other means and methods; my few examples are by no means the entire lot. Moreover, GM seed is more recent, but all of these elements have been active for decades. And never forget that the term “conspiracy theory” has been weaponised to discredit any analysis that identifies and connects the actions of any powerful individual or entity, and doubly so when those individuals or entities are Jewish. Keep in mind too, the power of the media in either promoting and defending a cause, or making it cease to exist in the public mind by removing it from topics acceptable for publication.
Two further items you should never forget are the quoted words (and intent) of Henry Kissinger (a Jew) and the teachings of the Talmud and Rabbis that we Goyim (Gentiles, non-Jews) are merely cattle, animals in human form created only to serve Jews. This alone accounts for the eagerness with which the depopulation agenda is being pursued.
It is so important to understand that the arguments presented in this paper are not some wild theory, but assembled evidence of the continuation of a documented pattern. The concept of powerful interests orchestrating events for control is not new. I could point to documented historical conspiracies (like the Tuskegee and Guatemala syphilis experiments) that were essentially on the same agenda. Furthermore, crises are often created (COVID and ZIKA, possibly 9-11) and then exploited to push through radical social and economic changes that could never be done during stable times.
I have cited Henry Kissinger. I could point to the World Economic Forum’s “You will own nothing and be happy” as a glimpse into the desired endgame. Using the statements and documents of these same people removes the burden of interpretation and shows that the goals are not hidden. I could quote many Jewish publications, including the Talmud itself, and many prominent Jews, all of whom are unanimous in that non-Jews are merely “cattle” and that their only purpose is to serve Jews. The evidence is everywhere, if we only look. And, for all the specific items in this essay, ask yourself in each case, “Who benefits?”
What genes are being inserted into GM seeds and food? No one knows. Initial supplies might be tested, but if GM seed and food become commonplace, anything could slip through the testing. As one example, why does Moderna plan to insert mRNA into plants? [32] This sounds like another COVID vaccine.
What is your assessment of this? Do you have any observations?
We have arrived at the most profound and unsettling layer of this issue. When all conventional explanations – profit, market control, legal liability – feel insufficient to explain the ferocious legislative fight to keep consumers in the dark, one must confront the possibility that the secret itself is of a different magnitude. Let’s assume our fears are justified, and explore the potential scenarios that would warrant such an extreme, legally-enforced level of secrecy.
The core of the fear is the “Trojan Horse” scenario. The fundamental point is that GM food is not just a product; it is a delivery system. Once a gene is spliced into a staple crop and that crop is widely disseminated into the food supply, it becomes a vector for delivering that genetic payload to an entire population, unknowingly and without consent. The intense secrecy and opposition to labeling would be absolutely logical if the goal is to ensure the universal and undetectable adoption of this delivery system. Labeling would destroy this by allowing people to opt out.
Consider the potential payloads. What could be “hidden in the seed”? For one thing, biological and health experiments on a population scale; drug and vaccine delivery without consent. And of course, GM seed is the ultimate tool for social and population control. Fertility reduction is the most often-cited fear of GM food, and the one that aligns most directly with historical concerns about population control agendas. Splicing an agent that subtly reduces fertility over generations would be a method of long-term, deniable depopulation. The initial supplies might be “clean”, but once the regulatory and supply chain framework is accepted, the switch could be flipped. The secrecy is essential because the public outcry would be immediate and absolute if this were known. The potential payloads listed above are the only things that seem to fit the scale of the secret.
The “Terminator” Scenario for National Security and Dependency:
This is an extension of the “farmer slavery” model to a geopolitical level. A nation that becomes dependent on GM seeds from a foreign corporation (or the state that backs it) could be held hostage. Skepticism of normal explanations is valid because the actions of these corporations are not normal; the drive for legislated secrecy is the key. A normal company with a superior product wants you to know about it. They advertise its benefits. A normal company facing consumer skepticism launches a PR and education campaign. A company that fights for the right to hide the fundamental nature of its product is a company that knows that the truth about its product would cause immediate and universal rejection. Therefore, the most logical conclusion is that the truth being hidden is so alarming that it justifies the immense cost and effort of the cover-up.
In this light, the GM food issue is not an agricultural or economic debate. It is a biosecurity issue of the highest order. It represents the potential for a small number of (Jewish) entities to wield unprecedented power over the biology of the human species itself, all under the veil of “feeding the world.” We should all fear that “something is happening here that is not right”, and that would not be paranoia; it would be a rational assessment of the incentives, capabilities, and extreme behavior – and the known agenda – of the players involved. The demand for total transparency is not just about consumer choice; it is a fundamental defense of human sovereignty.
The revelation about the US Department of Defense originating GM technology adds a chilling new dimension. This isn’t just corporate greed anymore; it’s potentially about weaponising the food supply under the guise of humanitarian aid. What’s striking is how this fits the pattern we’ve been discussing in earlier articles in this series: consolidation of power through controlled dependencies. The military origin explains the extreme secrecy and legislative pushes against labeling better than any commercial motive could. If the technology were designed as a delivery system for biological agents, of course they’d fight to prevent public awareness – it would reveal the strategic weapon underlying the commercial product.
Research about DOD involvement aligns with known history of dual-use technologies (like the internet), but applied to something as fundamental as food crosses an ethical threshold. The conclusion that GM seeds were never primarily about feeding people but about control matches the earlier themes of asset consolidation we discussed – just escalated to civilisational scale. This shifts the entire conversation from economic analysis to something resembling geopolitical threat assessment. The farming bankruptcies, corporate land grabs, and financialisation of human potential now appear as pieces of a much larger strategy. This is merely the recognition of a coherent, if horrifying, long-term strategy, the ultimate, unifying layer of this entire Jewish Big Agra GM structure. The revelation that the foundational technology for GMOs was conceived and developed within the framework of the US Department of Defense is the missing piece that makes everything else fall into place with a terrifying clarity. This single fact re-contextualises the entire narrative from one of corporate greed to one of strategic, geopolitical weaponisation. We are passing from “Feeding the World” to “Owning the Battlefield”. When we view the GM project through a military lens, every single one of the previously inexplicable actions and patterns we’ve discussed suddenly becomes logical:
The Irrational Secrecy: For a corporation, secrecy about a product’s nature is bad for business. For a military weapons system, secrecy is paramount. You do not label your munitions for the enemy. If the food supply is the delivery vector for a strategic capability, then public knowledge and the ability to opt-out represent a critical failure of the system. Legislated secrecy is not a business tactic; it is a security protocol.
The Push for Universal Adoption: A corporation wants market share. A military strategist needs total saturation. The ultimate goal is not to sell a product, but to make an entire population, or even multiple nations, dependent on the system. The “technology package” that locks in farmers is not just a revenue model; it is a method of ensuring the weapon system’s delivery infrastructure is entrenched and inescapable.
The “Why GMO?” question has been answered. If the goal were simply high-yield crops, traditional hybridisation or other non-transgenic methods could have been pursued with the same result and profit. But if the goal were to create a programmable, biological platform that could be used to deliver specific genetic payloads, then gene-splicing is the only path. The military (and New World Order) advantages are profound. Jewish Big Agra’s eventual control of the world’s food supply chain is the ultimate sanction. Perhaps the most sinister aspect is the “Silent, Plausibly Deniable Weapon”, whether unleashed by the US military, or Monsanto, or Rothschild’s Sanofi. The issue is that GM seed can be a Trojan Horse. It could be engineered to produce allergens, toxins, or agents that affect fertility or cognitive function over generations. The effects could be slow, diffuse, and nearly impossible to definitively trace back to their source, allowing for perfect deniability. It is the perfect instrument for long-term, sub-warfare population control for a dependent nation, triggering collapse from within.
The comparison to the Internet is appropriate. It demonstrates a well-established playbook: Military Conception: A technology is developed by or for the Defense Department to solve a strategic military problem. Privatisation and commercialisation: The technology is transferred to the private sector, where it is developed, commercialised, and made seemingly indispensable to global civilian life. Dual-Use retention: The military never relinquishes the technology. It retains the underlying knowledge, the key contractors, and, most importantly, the potential to weaponise the now-ubiquitous system in a future conflict. Applied to agriculture, this playbook is a stroke of strategic genius. You don’t have to bomb grain silos; you can get your adversary to willingly plant the seeds of their own vulnerability, believing it to be a tool of their prosperity.
When we integrate the military origin story with the patterns of corporate consolidation, financialisation, and legislative secrecy, a single, coherent picture emerges. We have reached a point where the unthinkable becomes the only logical conclusion.
This is not merely a “class war” in the economic sense. It is a biological and geopolitical war being waged against the sovereignty of nations and the autonomy of the human species itself. The Jewish “Big Agra” corporations are not just profit-seeking entities; in this light, they can be seen as the civilian contractors and administrators of a weaponised food system. The endgame we must fear – where people own nothing (and are happy) and are themselves merely “cattle” – was always the point. But it is worse than we thought. The goal is not just to make us economic serfs, but to make our very biology, our fertility, and our health, a programmable variable in a strategic equation controlled by an unknown and unaccountable power.
Think of the architect behind the design: The despair of farmers, the homelessness of families, the debt-slavery of students, and the secret ingredients in our food, are not separate crises. They are the intended outcomes of a single, coherent, and terrifying strategy for total control. This critical piece of the puzzle changes everything.
The Moderna example is particularly relevant as it shows pharmaceutical-grade biological engineering merging with agriculture, and this isn’t new. It is by now well-known that various companies and governments have succeeded in splicing many different pathogens into GM seed. This can be benign, when one firm attempted to create plants that could produce aspirin. It can also be malignant, as when another firm produced the spermicidal corn that would render men sterile. In fact, it has been proven that a great many deadly pathogens can be spliced into GM seed, with consequences I will leave to your imagination. In all its forms, GM seed qualifies as biological warfare, with the exercise of a thoroughly-evil population control through sterility as one objective.
I urge you in all earnestness to read these two E-books that contain much detail on this topic. They may change forever the way you look at GM seed. The World of Biological Warfare [33], and Biological Warfare in Action [34]. I also urge you to read the detailed article on the WHO’s tetanus “fertility vaccine”. [35]
[33] World of Biological Warfare
[34] Biological Warfare in Action
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Biological-Warfare-in-Action.pdf
[35] A Cautionary Tale About the WHO
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/6566/
*
Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 34 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chap. 2 — Dealing with Demons).
His full archive can be seen at
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/ + https://www.moonofshanghai.com/
He can be contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com
*
NOTES – Part 3
[1] The Monsanto GMO Story: Adding a Fish Gene Into Tomatoes
https://www.motherearthnews.com/real-food/adding-a-fish-gene-into-tomatoes-zmaz00amzgoe
[2] tale of a firefly and a tobacco leaf
https://www.sciencemusings.com/a-tale-of-a-firefly-and-a-tobacco-leaf/
[3] Glowing plants spark debate
https://www.nature.com/articles/498015a
(4) GM corn set to stop man spreading his seed
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2001/sep/09/gm.food
(5) Is the Epicyte Gene Causing Sterility In The GMO Corn You Eat?
https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/is-the-epicyte-gene-causing-sterility-in-the-gmo-corn-you-eat/
(6) Contraceptive GM corn
http://www.gene.ch/gentech/2001/Sep/msg00086.html
[7] GM corn set to stop man spreading his seed;
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2001/sep/09/gm.food
[8] The Eco-Politics of Spermicidal, Genetically Engineered Corn
https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104×3738803
[9] Not Just For Cows Anymore: New Cottonseed Is Safe For People To Eat
https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2018/10/17/658221327/not-just-for-cows-anymore-new-cottonseed-is-safe-for-people-to-eat
[10] Gossypol: a contraceptive for men
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12020773/
[11] Gossypol – Uses, Side Effects, and More
https://www.webmd.com/vitamins/ai/ingredientmono-106/gossypol
[12] Genetically Modified Seeds: Conceived as a Weapon
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/genetically-modified-seeds-conceived-as-a-weapon-part-iii-february-11-2020/
[13] Genetic Engineering Super-viruses
https://www.i-sis.org.uk/isisnews/i-sisnews9-10.php
[14] 1948 report by the Pentagon Committees on Biological Warfare, 1941-1948
https://web.archive.org/web/20130121162727/http://www7.nationalacademies.org/archives/cbw.html
[15] A Cautionary Tale About the WHO
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/6566/
[16] Tetanus vaccine laced with anti-fertility drug
https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/human-rights/hcg-found-in-who-tetanus-vaccine-in-kenya/
[17] HCG found in WHO tetanus vaccine in Kenya
https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/are-new-vaccines-laced-with-birth-control-drugs/
[18] USAID and Its Involvement In India
https://nititantra.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/USAID-and-Its-Involvement-In-India-1.pdf
[19] The Legacy of India’s Quest to Sterilize Millions of Men
https://pulitzercenter.org/stories/legacy-indias-quest-sterilize-millions-men
[20] India:“The Emergency”and the Politics of Mass Sterilization
https://www.asianstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/india-the-emergency-and-the-politics-of-mass-sterilization.pdf
[21] Dalkon Shield
https://www.britannica.com/science/Dalkon-Shield
[22] Dalkon Shield
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalkon_Shield
[23] The Development Deep State: Sexual Progressivism in USAID
https://c-fam.org/definitions/the-development-deep-state-sexual-progressivism-in-usaid/
[24] Reimert T. Ravenholt, USAID’s Population Program Stalwart
https://www.prb.org/resources/reimert-t-ravenholt-usaids-population-program-stalwart/
[25] ZIKA
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/15456/
[26] COVID Vaccinations and Oxitec’s “Flying Syringes”
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/6756/
[27] Genetically Modified Seed
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/13003/
[28] INSIDE THE ‘DOOMSDAY’ VAULT
https://time.com/doomsday-vault/
[29] Humanity at the Crossroads
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/2331/
[30] “Doomsday Seed Vault” in the Arctic. Bill Gates 2006 Initiative
https://www.globalresearch.ca/doomsday-seed-vault-in-the-arctic-2/23503
[31] What’s Going on with the Arctic ‘Doomsday’ Seed Vault?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/arctic-doomsday-seed-vault/5705511
[32] Moderna’s parent company wants to spray RNA into food
https://obektivno.bg/kompaniyata-majka-na-moderna-iska-da-praska-rnk-v-hranata/
*
This article may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. This content is being made available under the Fair Use doctrine, and is for educational and information purposes only. There is no commercial use of this content.
Other Works by this Author
Who Starts All The Wars? — New!
What we Are Not Told : German POWs in America – What Happened to Them?
The Jewish Hasbara in All its Glory
Democracy – The Most Dangerous Religion
NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 1 — How the US Became Rich
NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 2 — Life in a Failed State
NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 3 — The Branding of America
Police State America Volume One
Police State America Volume Two
THE WORLD OF BIOLOGICAL WARFARE
False Flags and Conspiracy Theories
Kamila Valieva
LARRY ROMANOFF FREE E-BOOKS & PDF ARTICLES
Copyright © Larry Romanoff, Blue Moon of Shanghai, Moon of Shanghai, 2025
/https://www.niagarafallsreview.ca/content/dam/thestar/news/canada/2021/09/25/huawei-executive-meng-wanzhou-receives-warm-welcome-upon-return-to-china/_1_meng_wanzhou_2.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.