And Why Conspiracy Theories Arise
In Chapter Two of my earlier E-book titled “False Flags and Conspiracy Theories” [1], I wrote the following two paragraphs:
“Conspiracy theory” is the name given to public perceptions or beliefs that differ from the official (usually government) story about an event, and where a significant portion of the public believes the government is hiding some or all of the truth. Conspiracy theories generally arise when justified, which means when the official story isn’t supported by the facts and is often riddled with inconsistencies; where the presented facts range from implausible to impossible; when the story repeatedly changes; where the logic is flawed and the pieces just don’t fit together. So, when the facts don’t add up, when the story doesn’t make sense, we believe we are being lied to yet again. And we probably are.
The label of ‘conspiracy theory’ originated decades ago as part of a deliberate plan to discredit members of the public who questioned the official version of events, those who made public their suspicions of government criminal activity. The plan was to solicit the assistance of the major media to apply the label of ‘conspiracy theorist’ to these individuals as a way to silence them and discourage rational attention to their claims. The process was both decidedly nasty and effective, since the public media attacks strongly suggested these individuals were mentally unbalanced and delusional, the deprecating public attention often being sufficient to ruin a reputation and destroy a career. Today, the expression is often used as a way to dismiss someone as a fool whose ideas are unworthy of attention but, as Mike Adams wrote, “It’s a tactic frequently used by modern-day thought police in a desperate attempt to demand ‘Don’t go there!’”.
The story of Charlie Kirk’s assassination qualifies on all counts, both as a story where the “official version” makes no sense, and as a prime candidate for yet another (well-deserved) “conspiracy theory”. Let’s perform a brief examination of the story as presented in the media.
Charlie Kirk was giving a public speech in a Utah college courtyard when a single shot rang out, apparently from a nearby rooftop. Kirk was apparently shot in the neck, and slumped over, dead. There was little to no security at the event. [2] [3] According to authorities, a video recording from a 24/7 CCTV camera showed the suspect moving onto the campus, through stairwells, up to a roof and across the roof to the shooting location. After the shot, the person moved to the other side of the building, jumped off the building and fled the campus. Authorities claimed to have recovered from a nearby wooded area a high-powered 30-06 rifle that which they presented as the murder weapon. The rifle was apparently wrapped in a towel. Bullet casings claimed to have been found at the scene of the shooting were engraved with messages.
Rather soon after the shooting, the apparent perpetrator went onto the social media platform Discord, and made a full confession, not only admitting to the murder but offering details of the planning, execution and escape. The Washington Post [4] and many other mass media reported this. CBS News [5], The UK Independent [6] and others, offered varying information, the secondary websites offering more detail. PolitiFact (affiliated with the Poynter Institute) offered a typically fraudulent “debunking” of false claims they themselves made, just to help smoke up the room. For those readers who don’t know, both PolitiFact and Poynter are Jewish institutions specialising in misinformation and worse. I covered this in one Chapter of an earlier E-book: Propaganda and the Media – Part 7 — Fact-Checking. If you read this, it will open your eyes. [7]
The Inconsistencies. Of these, there are many
The Rooftop Scene
The roof from where Tyler Robinson is supposed to have shot Charlie Kirk, positioned at the yellow arrow. Source:
Above is a screenshot of the roof from where the fatal shot was apparently fired. As noted above, according to authorities, a video recording from a 24/7 CCTV camera showed the suspect moving onto the campus, through stairwells, up to a roof and across the roof to the shooting location. After the shot, the person moved to the other side of the building, jumped off the building and fled the campus.
But where is that video? The version released showed only an individual moving on the roof of the building after the shooting, hardly evidence of a crime. The entire first portion of this supposed video would have recorded in detail the actual preparation and shooting, but the authorities edited it to begin only with the supposed “escape”. Why would they do that? Because the video doesn’t show what they claim. If such a video did actually exist, it would have been released. There is nothing to show a man taking a shot, nor even clutching a rifle. The only possibility is that the claim was fabricated in entirety.
When reading this portion, I couldn’t help thinking of the 9-11 aircraft that supposedly crashed into the Pentagon. According to media reports, there were 85 CCTV cameras in the vicinity, all of which would have captured the supposed crash. But the FBI seized all of them and refused to release them on the basis that “they don’t show anything”. [8] So, an airliner crashes into the Pentagon while being filmed by 85 video cameras, but none of those recordings show anything. Why would you believe a story like that? This one is the same. “We have the video of the shooter taking position and firing the shot, but we won’t release it. We will show only an individual leaving the rooftop”. Why would you believe a story like this?
But in fact, the videos do show something that the media seem to have ignored: “The strange reactions of people standing behind Kirk are striking: videos show some making gestures and reacting quickly even before the gunshot.” [8a] There is no easy way to explain this reaction if the shooter is on a rooftop 150 meters distant. These “gestures and reactions” would make sense only if the actual shooter were on or near the stage, within easy sight of the others. There have been reports that Kirk was not shot with a rifle but with what was called a “palm pistol”, a derringer or similar small-caliber handgun, easily concealed and effective only at close range. This theory does fit all the known facts.
To justify more cynicism of the official story is the important fact that the man seen leaving (or running from) the rooftop was not holding a rifle. That could mean only one thing: he had left the rifle on the rooftop before escaping. But then, how was he going to “wrap the rifle in a towel” and hide it in the woods, if he didn’t take it with him on his escape? And he clearly did not have the rifle with him when he left the rooftop, so how did the authorities find it in the woods, and how could they attribute it to him?
The Murder Weapon
The official narrative is that Charlie Kirk was killed by a shot from a 30-06 rifle, the bullet hitting him in the neck and lodging there without exiting. The explanation was that Kirk’s neck bones were in such magnificent condition that they stopped the bullet. This would have to rank as one of the biggest lies ever told.
A 30-06 is a very high-powered rifle. Hunters and shooters have unanimously stated that a 30-06 bullet will pass clean through the trunk of a pine tree 14 or 15 inches (35-40 cm.) in diameter. It will drop a large moose or grizzly bear dead in its tracks, and will penetrate steel armor. I can personally testify that a 30-06 bullet will pass easily through several centimeters (much more than half an inch) of solid steel, leaving only a clean hole. To claim that a man’s neck bones stopped such a projectile in its tracks, is too ridiculous to bother refuting. The only way such a thing could occur would be if Kirk had been shot from a great distance, perhaps 2 kilometers, when the bullet had expended all its energy and retained only enough power to penetrate soft flesh. But Kirk was apparently shot from approximately 150 meters. At that distance, a hard-point bullet would have penetrated anything and everything in its path, and a soft-point bullet would have left an exit hole at least the size of a teacup, if not a cereal bowl. In real life, a shot in the neck from close range with a 30-06 would quite possibly have blown the man’s head clean off. It would also have left an enormous spray of blood everywhere. I don’t know what weapon was used to shoot Charlie Kirk, but I can tell you that it wasn’t a 30-06.
One physician said, “I’m a surgeon and I have seen what bullets do. The ones from high-powered rifles don’t politely stop because someone drinks their milk. The idea that Charlie’s skeleton magically turned into Captain America’s shield is pure fiction.”
The Multiple Casings
The official story claims the perpetrator fired one shot, then fled the scene. Well then, what was the origin of the multiple bullets and spent casings found at the scene, with messages either written or engraved? A “casing” is an already-fired cartridge, merely the brass tube into which the projectile and gunpowder are inserted. But we are told that only one shot was fired, so how could all these other “multiple casings” exist? Are we to believe the shooter brought with him already-fired bullets and sprinkled them around the crime scene before escaping? You know that doesn’t make any sense. The only answer that does make sense is that the casing story was fabricated to help lend credibility to the story.
The Confession
Put yourself in this position: You have just shot and killed a well-known politician. Among your first acts after the murder is to go on your social media account, make a public post not only confessing to the murder you have just committed, but listing most of the small details of your planning, execution, and escape. Would you do that? Not likely. Even worse, the alleged perpetrator of this crime detailed in his post how he planned to dispose of the rifle so it could never be found, and thus leave nothing to connect him to the crime. Of course, the only flaw in this plan is that he posted these details on social media so that the entire world would know there was nothing to connect him to the murder he had just committed. Why does this make sense to you?
But there was much more. RT produced this list where the alleged shooter:
Confessed to the crime
Confirmed his motive for the murder
Confirmed the length of time in planning the murder
Confirmed the type of weapon
Confirmed the weapon’s current hidden location, and that it was wrapped in a towel
Admitted to engraving slogans on the bullets
As RT also pointed out, much of the phraseology used in these posts resembles professional terminology extremely unlikely to be used by a 22-year-old kid. Terms referring to “the swept area” and “drop point”, lead us almost inevitably to someone fabricating circumstantial evidence to convince the gullible public of their story. And let’s not forget there are many documented instances of individuals or intelligence agencies hacking into someone’s social media account to post whatever they want.
Some websites that listed details of the “confession”: The Hill [9], LA Times [10], Patriot.com [11], Washington Post [12], CBS News [13], UK Independent [14].
The Crime Scene
As we all know from watching TV, when a crime is suspected, the local police generally cordon off the area with yellow tape that prohibits entry to the area. But in this case – an assassination, no less – nothing of the kind was done. The police and FBI appeared oblivious to the fact that a murder was a crime and that the location needed to be maintained in sterile condition pending a full investigation. Further to this, as RT reported, “Not just was the site not cordoned off, but a man was filmed taking down the camera that had been mounted right behind Kirk … He is subsequently seen placing the camera on a table, looking around furtively, and then removing the SD card.” Tampering with a crime scene is normally a felony, but apparently not in this case. We will never know what happened to the video recording from that camera, but we can legitimately ask why it was removed – as if under earlier instruction. More than this, a few days after the shooting, the entire area was ripped up and reconstructed, preventing any examination of the crime scene. No explanation was given for this.
Pravda suggested: “This clearly suggests that the FBI appears to have botched the investigation and hastily concocted charges under pressure from the White House.” I disagree. Neither the local police nor the FBI are so incompetent as to completely botch a murder investigation. They were doing what they were told to do, the main result being the destruction or loss of most of the actual evidence, and a fabrication of the remainder. There is no way any of this was an accident or caused by incompetence or error.
The Strange Airplane
This part appears to fall into the “conspiracy theory” category, but I have not researched this and haven’t the expertise to comment so I will merely record what has been reported. There are afficionados who track aircraft flights (and ownership) as an avocation. Their reports are generally a chronicle of facts, and not usually suspect. In this case, we have something that is definitely suspicious but may or may not be related to Kirk’s assassination. The information comes primarily from FlightRadar and the FAA Aircraft Registry. The stated facts are that, almost immediately after Kirk’s shooting, a private jet aircraft took off from an airport very near the campus where Kirk was shot. This aircraft, a 2013 Bombardier Challenger 300, FAA identification number N888KG, was registered to N888KG LLC, based in Lehi, Utah. It is owned by Derek Maxfield, a Jew and a wealthy donor to the Chabad Lubavitch of Utah. The reports state that this aircraft filed no flight plan, and had its transponder turned off. This is violently illegal, and is something that only the military or intelligence services can do – or by an influential individual with the cooperation and approval of the intelligence services.
Did the Khazar Jews Eliminate Charlie Kirk?
We are now fully into speculation, and perhaps a conspiracy environment as well, but a few facts bear listing and deserve pondering. Foremost among these is that Charlie Kirk was well-known to influential Jews and Jewish groups in the US, as well as by Benjamin Netanyahu, and there is evidence Kirk was being groomed as a potential US (Jewish) presidential candidate, but one who was suddenly (and resentfully) going astray.
I will summarise as best I can. Charlie Kirk was the leader of an organisation named Turning Point USA, which was America’s largest conservative youth association. This organisation was heavily supported and funded by Jews, with Kirk being considered a celebrity among them. In the early days of this organisation, Kirk was instrumental in promoting many of the programs or attitudes the Jews wanted propagated in the US. And he was gaining a very high public profile, with his name already being promoted (by Jews) as a presidential candidate in the next US election. And indeed, many observers have noted that Kirk’s public appearances seemed a duplicate of Donald Trump’s campaign rallies. All was going well until Kirk appeared to have a change of heart and became increasingly critical of both the Jews and Israel.
Max Blumenthal and Chris Hedges covered this background on Kirk, and on his political development, in an article I strongly urge you to read. [15] Also, Max Blumenthal did an excellent work in an article published in The Grayzone titled, “Charlie Kirk refused Netanyahu funding offer, was ‘frightened’ by pro-Israel forces before death”. I strongly urge you to read this one as well. [16] Briefly, Benjamin Netanyahu was very familiar with Kirk and was willing to pay Kirk as much as $150 million for him to return to his “Jewish” roots and back off his criticism of Israel. This article contains much useful information, to help you place things in context. I strongly recommend you read it. [16a] Kirk apparently dismissed Netanyahu’s offer with some contempt, and his reversion on Israeli influence “provoked a private backlash from Netanyahu’s allies that left him angry and afraid”. Reports were that Kirk was genuinely afraid for not only his own well-being but also for his life.
From Blumenthal’s article: “In the weeks leading up to his September 10 assassination, Kirk had come to loathe the Israeli leader, regarding him as a “bully,” the source said. Kirk was disgusted by what he witnessed inside the Trump administration, where Netanyahu sought to personally dictate the president’s personnel decisions. Trump was terrified of [Netanyahu] … Kirk had become the target of a sustained private campaign of intimidation and free-floating fury by wealthy and powerful allies of Netanyahu – figures he described in an interview as Jewish “leaders” and “stakeholders”. Kirk was bombarded with infuriated text messages and phone calls from Netanyahu’s wealthy allies in the US, including many who had funded TPUSA. According to his longtime friend, the Zionist donors treated Kirk with outright contempt, essentially ordering him to fall back into line. Harrison Smith, a personality at the pro-Trump Infowars network, stated on August 13 – almost a month before Kirk’s assassination – that he was told by “someone close to Charlie Kirk that Kirk thinks Israel will kill him if he turns against Israel.”
“The frienzied speculation set off shockwaves in Tel Aviv, where Netanyahu was compelled to explicitly deny that his government killed Kirk.” But the mere fact that Netanyahu denied guilt, functions more as proof than exoneration. And of course, the Times of Israel chimed in to support Netanyahu and tell us that any accusations of any kind against Jews or Israel is just more “anti-Semitism”. [17] From their article: “Netanyahu asserted that the young conservative pundit “loved Israel” and “loved the Jewish people.” Quoting from a letter he said Kirk had sent him a few months prior to his killing, Netanyahu said that advocating for Israel was one of Kirk’s “greatest joys as a Christian”.
Netanyahu’s words are clearly false, evidenced by his own vicious attacks on Kirk, as well as those by countless influential Jews in the US. Clearly, it was not one of Kirk’s “greatest joys as a Christian” to contemplate those same loving Jews killing him for speaking out against them.
And the letter that Kirk supposedly sent to Netanyahu shortly before his death, where he disclosed his “great love for Israel”? I am reminded of the Jew who produced a “letter from Fidel Castro”, in which Castro proclaimed his undying love for Jews and Israel. The letter was produced only after Castro’s death and provenance could thus never be determined. The letter was widely believed to be a Jewish forgery, its statements very much at odds with Castro’s known public position on Jews. I doubt very much Netanyahu possesses any letter from Kirk that is favorable and, if it does exist, it is certain to be a forgery.
And, just so it doesn’t remain unsaid, it is disconcerting to learn that US Jews (through Bill Ackman) apparently offered $1 million to the family of the young alleged shooter – turn him in to the authorities. There is something here that really stinks. (See ref. 16a)
This brings us back to The Strange Airplane mentioned above. It is not in dispute that influential Jews in the US could obtain the necessary permission and cooperation from the intelligence services to transport an assassin from the scene of the crime, in much (illegal) secrecy.
Epilogue
I do not know what happened with Charlie Kirk, but I can tell you that the official story promulgated by the White House and the US media is a lie in its entirety – 100%. There is no part of the story that is even plausible, much less likely. Again, I do not know what happened, but the only theory that fits all the known facts is that Charlie Kirk was killed by a small-caliber weapon from very close range. A political assassination to remind everyone that you don’t cross the Jews. And done with the full knowledge and cooperation of the various agencies of the US government – including the White House. You will have to examine the evidence and form your own conclusion.
*
Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 34 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 100 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chap. 2 — Dealing with Demons).
His full archive can be seen at
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/ + https://www.moonofshanghai.com/
He can be contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com
*
NOTES – Charlie Kirk
[1] False Flags and Conspiracy Theories
[2] A college campus, a fiery speaker — and then a single gunshot
https://apnews.com/article/charlie-kirk-assassination-turning-point-utah-c8192d8eda83312aabf4cf0a3cd6e5f1
[3] Charlie Kirk shooting: A visual timeline of how it unfolded
https://abcnews.go.com/US/visual-timeline-charlie-kirk-shooting-unfolded/story?id=125478526
[4] Washington Post; Kirk shooter chat
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2025/09/15/charlie-kirk-shooter-suspect-discord-chat/
[5] Charlie Kirk murder suspect appeared to confess to killing on Discord, company says
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/charlie-kirk-suspect-discord-messages/
[6] Charlie Kirk assassin confession
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/charlie-kirk-assassin-confession-tyler-robinson-b2827019.html
[7] Propaganda and the Media – Part 7 — Fact-Checking
[8] False Flags and Conspiracy Theories — Chapter 4 – The 9-11 Attacks
[8a] Security Agency Failure or Hoax?
https://news-pravda.com/world/2025/09/27/1724519.html
[9] Alleged Charlie Kirk assassin apparently confessed in Discord chat group: Report
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/5505318-charlie-kirk-alleged-shooter-discord-confession/
[10] GOP threatens clampdown on social media after Charlie Kirk suspect allegedly confessed on Discord
https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2025-09-18/charlie-kirk-shooting-turns-spotlight-on-discord
[11] ‘I have bad news’: Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin confessed on Discord: Report
[12] Washington Post; Kirk shooter chat
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2025/09/15/charlie-kirk-shooter-suspect-discord-chat/
[13] Charlie Kirk murder suspect appeared to confess to killing on Discord, company says
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/charlie-kirk-suspect-discord-messages/
[14] Charlie Kirk assassin confession
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/charlie-kirk-assassin-confession-tyler-robinson-b2827019.html
[15] Israel, Charlie Kirk, and the Weaponization of Murder (w/ Max Blumenthal)
https://www.unz.com/article/israel-charlie-kirk-and-the-weaponization-of-murder-w-max-blumenthal/
[16] Charlie Kirk refused Netanyahu funding offer, was ‘frightened’ by pro-Israel forces before death
[16a] Netanyahu tried to bribe Charlie Kirk with $150m, shooter’s family offered $1m by Ackman
[17] Rejecting far-right conspiracy theory, Netanyahu reiterates Israel didn’t kill Charlie Kirk
https://www.timesofisrael.com/rejecting-far-right-conspiracy-theory-netanyahu-reiterates-israel-didnt-kill-charlie-kirk/
*
This article may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. This content is being made available under the Fair Use doctrine, and is for educational and information purposes only. There is no commercial use of this content.
Other Works by this Author
Who Starts All The Wars? — New!
What we Are Not Told : German POWs in America – What Happened to Them?
The Jewish Hasbara in All its Glory
Democracy – The Most Dangerous Religion
NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 1 — How the US Became Rich
NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 2 — Life in a Failed State
NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 3 — The Branding of America
Police State America Volume One
Police State America Volume Two
THE WORLD OF BIOLOGICAL WARFARE
False Flags and Conspiracy Theories
Kamila Valieva
LARRY ROMANOFF FREE E-BOOKS & PDF ARTICLES
Copyright © Larry Romanoff, Blue Moon of Shanghai, Moon of Shanghai, 2025
/https://www.niagarafallsreview.ca/content/dam/thestar/news/canada/2021/09/25/huawei-executive-meng-wanzhou-receives-warm-welcome-upon-return-to-china/_1_meng_wanzhou_2.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.