Coronavirus: People are left
alone in the face of a rapidly growing virus pandemic – some thoughts out of
Germany
Coronavirus: People are left
alone in the face of a rapidly growing virus pandemic – some thoughts out of
Germany
by Roman Baudzus
Germany’s Federal Minister
of Health, Jens Spahn (CDU), is a professional politician and a bureaucrat, so
it can be assumed that Spahn may have learned a lot from Jean-Claude Juncker,
who recently resigned as the EU´s Commission President.
“When things get serious,
you have to lie,” Juncker once blatantly said in public when looking back at the euro crisis
in the year 2011. It is easy to understand that, in addition to statements like
these, it is the adapting behavior patterns of bureaucrats and professional
politicians that have led to a steady decline in trust among citiziens in their
European institutions over the past few years.
The fact that Jens Spahn
seemed to be using the motto of Jean-Claude Juncker on the evening of January
31st was probably noticed by anyone who, based on good observation skills,
developed a feeling for making an assessment for himself or herself of when and
whether someone is lying.
This impression came to
viewers on the evening of a TV program called “Maybrit Illner”, which is
broadcast once a week on the Second German Television (ZDF), during which the
discussions among the invited guests was the “novel Coronavirus” and its
possibly associated dangers and risks for the German population.
According to data officially
reported by the National Health Department of China (NHS), it should be noted
that the number of novel Coronavirus infections in mainland China had – at this
point of time – already exceeded the SARS infections registered in 2002 and
2003 over a period of nine months.
The city of Wuhan and the
province of Hubei were already under lockdown enforced by the members of the
People’s Liberation Army. At the same time, first cases of infection became
known in Germany in the free state of Bavaria, where a Chinese woman infected
at least four employees of the Bavarian automotive supplier Webasto with the
new corona virus.
The afore mentioned TV
program developed into a clash between Federal Minister of Health, Jens Spahn,
look for yourself at the tense impression the guy made during the program, and Dr. Johannes Wimmer.
Statements and warnings from Dr. Wimmer, according to whom the prospect of an
aggravation of the situation in Germany should also be expected and a
possibly deteriorating mood among the population, was answered by Spahn with
occassional aggressive rejections.
The official narrative of
the German federal government at this very early point in time was that only a
handful of infection cases with the novel Coronavirus or SARS-CoV-2 had been
identified in Germany, whereas in the course of a seasonal flu, far more people
were statistically at risk from contagion and / or could find death. The
Coronavirus would be more harmless than a normal flu. At this time, there was
no reason for scaremongering, according to Spahn. And it would be
counterproductive.
Spahn also pointed out that
the German health care system was well prepared if there was an increase in the
number of infections in the country, whereas according to his statement at the
time, five of the people suffering from the novel Coronavirus were already
doing well and were cheerfully happy.
Not just Dr. Johannes
Wimmer, but also other German doctors and virologists see the statements made
by Spahn in a contrary way. Spahn was often faced with the illusion that
Germany’s hospitals were well prepared for such a crisis.
Many people who work in
German hospitals or care facilities have complained for years that there is a
lack of personnel and important resources in this area. At this point in time,
doctors and nursing staff are completely overwhelmed with their daily amount of
patients.
As a result, it cannot be
ruled out that, in the event of a pandemic and a massive increase in the number
of affected patients, the German health system could collapse due to a lack of
staff and permanent austerity measures – if it got really bad like in China.
In the face of a drastically
worsening situation in mainland China following this television discussion, the
Chinese government, whose officially transmitted infection data cannot be
believed for a variety of reasons, Chinese travelers – despite many demands
from various associations – were not refused entry to Germany by the German
government.
Infection clusters were also
growing in other regions of the world, particularly in Thailand, Iran, Japan,
South Korea and Malaysia. From the point of view of the German federal
government, this also gave no reason to protect the country’s home airports
from travelers from the most affected countries by simply banning them from entry.
What was done was to
introduce the taking of temperatures at German airports and set up various
information boards to alert arriving travelers from all over the world to the
dangers associated with the new coronavirus.
Since it had long been
established at the time based on the results of a study that people infected
with the novel Coronavirus could be asymptomatic for up to 24 days, which means
without showing any signs of symptoms or illness, this behavior of the German
federal government has already been negligent and over the past few weeks
completely incomprehensible.
At the same time, the
official narrative, according to which normal influenza was more dangerous and
resulted in more fatalities over the course of a season, was maintained by the
Federal Government and Federal Health Minister Jens Spahn, with which, from
today’s perspective, the German population was misled and misinformed by its
own government.
Officials such as Federal
Minister of Health, Spahn, constantly downplayed possible dangers and risks,
while increasingly critical reporting on the Internet was of course defamed
under the category “conspiracy theories”.
From this point of view, the
question arose how an interview by health expert Karl Lauterbach from the SPD
party ruling the country in a coalition with the CDU with Springer press medium
“Die Welt“ from February 3 fitted into this narrative, which was officially
maintained by the federal government, in which Lauterbach announced as follows:
“We are dealing with a very dangerous pest.”
Now it should be looked at whether
the time since the beginning of February has been used by the German government
to initiate any preventive or containment measures of SARS-CoV-2 from spreading
in the home country in the face of constantly increasing infection numbers in
the rest of the world.
In this regard, nothing
happened over the entire month of February. Rather, the risk of contagion and
the health risk associated with SARS-CoV-2 were still downplayed by the German
Minister of Health, Jens Spahn, in public appearances, with the help of
Germany´s National Center for Infections and Disease Control, namely the Robert
Koch-Institute (RKI).
The Robert Koch-Institute
even issued the recommendation not to wear face masks. The question arises
whether this recommendation could have something to do with the fact that German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas sent
protective clothing, sprayers and disinfectants in abundance to China after the
German government made the statement to the Chinese authorities to support them
in their struggle against their local epidemic.
The result is that mouth and
face masks have been sold out in almost all German pharmacies for some time.
Some pharmacies that still have face masks in stock now sell a pack of 100
pieces for up to 90 euros. The German government is countering a buying panic
by notifying the public that mouth protection against the virus is of no use.
Let´s see how things are
seen in China, where Global Times editor Hu Xijin twittered as follows on
March2, 2020:
Suggesting people not wear
face mask is seriously misleading. All of the Chinese experts have advised
people to wear face masks when in contact with others during time of epidemic
and consider it one of the most effective measures. Please heed suggestion of
Chinese experts. pic.twitter.com/xUxq11m7Bg
And this at a time when a
great deal of uncertainty was and is even more so spreading among the German
population despite the attempt by government officials to calm down everyone,
the German Chancellor Angela Merkel would have been expected to turn to the
citizenry in terms of addressing the threat that is associated with SARS-CoV-2.
But in this emerging crisis,
Merkel can hardly be heard or seen at all. Anyone who has followed the news
formats on Germany´s public channels such as the first channel (ARD) over the
month of February, especially the daily news broadcast every evening at 8:00
p.m. (Tagesschau), could not help but become aware of it, to become a “victim”
of a propaganda and disinformation campaign that seemed to be focused on
supressing what´s going on in the rest of the world.
The more the number of
infections with SARS-CoV-2 increased abroad – and especially in Asia – the
calmer it became in the reporting by Germany´s public media. In some news
programs such as ARD Tagesschau, the global development around SARS-CoV-2 was
increasingly not even mentioned in one word. Such reporting can be described as
ignoring propaganda.
Otherwise, most of the news
programs on public channels, for whose reception German citizens have to pay an
annual compulsory levy, dedicated its news stories in particular to the
regional election in the eastern German state of Thuringia (Thüringen), the
interference of the Berlin government with regard to its election result and a
supposedly reviving right-wing radicalism in the country.
Once there was talk of the
spread of SARS-CoV-2, it was in most cases about an establishment of quarantine
stations in the country, in which German citizens brought home from Wuhan were
taken in over a period of 14 days. It has also been reported that members of
the German Red Cross will volunteer to help those affected in these quarantine
facilities.
The fact that a 14-day
quarantine period, based on current studies showing that the incubation period
can be up to 27 days before infected people start developing disease symptoms,
turns out to be too short, is neither mentioned nor addressed in the official
planning of the various government authorities.
Furthermore, German airports
remained open to travelers from high-risk areas such as China, Iran, South
Korea, Thailand, etc. throughout the entire month of February – and this is
still the case at present time.
A responsible government
would have ensured that risks, threats, and dangers were communicated openly to
the citizenry!
In my view, a responsible
government would have ensured that risks and dangers were communicated openly
to an increasingly insecure population. This would have included the temporary
suspension of major events such as Carnival, Bundesliga soccer matches or the
like in order to prevent a massive spread of infections. However, none of this
has happened so far.
After such decisions have
long been made in Italy, France and Switzerland, the German government is still
not doing anything. The result is that weekend after weekend tens of thousands
of visitors flock to the Bundesliga soccer stadiums to enjoy the matches.
The whole thing gets even
more incredible. Despite the significant increase in confirmed novel
Coronavirus cases in Germany, the Robert Koch-Institute does still not seem to
see any increased risk to the general health of the German population.
“The risk can be assessed as
low to moderate,” said RKI Vice President Lars Schaade recently at a press
conference in Berlin. The RKI also advises: “Please receive your informatiom
from reliable sources.” This statement is intended to insinuate that in the
case of a “reliable source” it is solely the Robert Koch-Institute to advise
people what to do and what not do.
Are people listening what
the RKI is publicly recommending? It does not seem so. And there must be a
valid reason why people choose not to listen.
For example the RKI explicitly
does not recommend “the use of disinfectants in everyday life, even in this
current situation. It is neither recommended to use face masks or any other
kind of mouth-nose protection in the general public or in everyday life. ”
It is already known among
people that the RKI advises against mouth-nose protection like a mantra. Reason
seems to be, as more and more local politicians from several states warn, that
there is by far not enough equipment stored at German warehouses for which the
health minister of the Western state Nothrine-Westphalia not only openly
apologized recently but also said in a TV discussion to feel ashamed that things like this would be possible in a
developed nation like Germany.
Hygiene expert Professor Dr.
Klaus-Dieter Zastrow contrastingly believes that the hand disinfection among people is
now actively talked down by the RKI, what Zastrow finds “extremely dangerous”.
“This is a kind of
misinformation that does neither help the population nor the country a yota in
containing the local epidemic,” says Zastrow. Mouth and nose protection is the
only effective protection against droplet infection. ”
The expert repeatedly
criticized the incorrect information being published by the RKI. Since mouth
and nose protection as well as hand disinfection were discouraged from the
onset, the result is that a spread of the virus is even promoted and there
would be no way to contain it.
Over the past few years
things like this have unfortunately become quite normal in Germany. The fact
that eleven cities in the two Northern Italian provinces of Lombardy and Veneto
are now under lockdown by police and military forces does not change the
perspective of the German government and the Robert Koch-Institute at all.
Considering the dramatically
increasing number of confirmed cases, it is still pretended that an even
greater spread of the novel Coronavirus in Germany could be managed by itself,
although Federal Health Minister Jens Spahn has meanwhile announced that
individual infection chains can no longer be traced back.
From “Coronavirus is more harmless than flu” to “We are at the beginning of a
serious epidemic” – Despite the fact, Spahn is still doing nothing while Merkel
is nowhere to be seen or heard!
After all, the basic general
opinion of the German Federal Minister of Health changed at least once after
the events in Northern Italy, since Spahn all of a sudden sees Germany “at the
beginning of a Coronavirus epidemic”. It’s hard to believe! In a conference
call, he (Spahn) asked the Federal Health Ministers of the 16 German states to
“activate their pandemic plans and prepare for their possible entry into
force”.
Despite his fears of an
epidemic outbreak, Mr. Spahn still does not want to consider closing the German
borders to other – and highly affected – European nations or to take into
consideration a set up of police controls at the inner German borders of the individual
states!
What kind of political
“leadership” is that? Mr. Spahn seems to be waiting for the novel Coronavirus
to spread throughout Germany, what is happening anyway at the moment. The
failure to act by this federal government does not only leave you with the
impression of negligence, but almost with the bitter impression of sabotaging
the interests of the own population!
And what does the Brussels EU have to say in terms of this development: We
exactly got what had to be expected.
Even in the wake of the
rapid spread of the novel Coronavirus in Europe, EU officials are vehemently
opposed to finally implementing border closures. Rather, in the face of current
developments, it seems more important from their perspective to maintain
the policy of open borders among the 28 European Union member states.
Meanwhile, the number of
confirmed infections in Italy has risen to more than 2,300 and a death toll of
52 persons as of today. Please keep in mind that this increase from three to
more than 2,300 officially confirmed cases occurred within just a little more
than one week. But the EU Health ministers, including Mr. Jens Spahn, still
insist on their viewpoint that the Schengen agreement must remain untouched.
In the meantime, 50,000
citizens in Northern Italy still see themselves under lockdown in the two
provinces of Lombardy and Veneto. From this point of view, why is it so
difficult to close the borders in order to prevent an infiltration from Italy
to the neighbouring nations on the continent? !! According to published
information many cases being recently confirmed show that the affected German
persons had been on vaccation or a business trip to Italy. Or they
contracted the novel Coronavirus while being out for Carnival as if no one
could have seen this coming.
Infiltration has already
happened in Switzerland and Austria, too. The Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe
Conti refuses to consider border closures as well, arguing that such a decision
would not prevent the novel Coronavirus spreading to other European nations –
what?!
Do you understand this
logic? To minimize the spread of the highly infectious Coronavirus, far more
drastic measures are likely to be needed soon, when you look at China and what
the Chinese government was willing to be doing to bring the R0 or reproductive
value of this virus down to one or below that level.
Former Italian Minister of
the Interior, Matteo Salvini, has in the meantime called for the resignation of
Conte in response to Conte’s statements, because Conte obviously seems to
be “unable to defend Italy and its citizens against a great danger”.
French Transport Minister
Jean-Baptiste Djebbari also refuses to close borders between France and Italy –
not even temporarily. Germany´s Federal Minister of Health, Spahn, who has so far
turned out to be a total failure in view of the crisis – and above all from a
German perspective – seems to see things the same way.
EU Health Commissioner
Stella Kyriakides naturally sees things in the light of a common European
market. Why wonder about Ms. Kyriakides being worried, when according to her
own statement she sees “risks of a disinformation campaign”.
Statements like this are
just echoing “concerns” over at the WHO, whose general director Dr Ghebreyesus
is still not willing to declare a global pandemic by obviously keeping a close
eye on the development of the so called catastrophe bonds formerly issued by
the Worldbank. All these side shows seem to be more of importance than the
health issues being associated with the Coronavirus outbreak. Or just name it
corruption.
The question arises whether
it is perhaps not just those people who are in leading political positions who,
due to their ideologically coloured glasses, seem to be no longer aware of what
is happening in the world. At what point will it become more important to stop
a global and highly dangerous pandemic instead of putting one’s own economic
ideology of open borders above the well-being of all people on our continent
and the rest of the world?
A recent article in The Epoch Times, stated with reference to
Deutschlandfunk, (in extracts) as follows:
Virologist criticizes “very slow” government reaction – Coronavirus “at least
ten times more dangerous” than flu
The German virologist
Alexander Kekulé has criticized the reactions of the European Union authorities
regarding the outbreak of the novel Coronavirus. The approch of the responsible
authorities would be far too “slow, relaxed, and leisurely”, Kekulé told
Deutschlandfunk.
He called for “early” entry
controls and “area-wide screenings” to protect populations against the
epidemic, but it did not happen with the result that “infiltrations from
country to country occured”. Kekulé holds the academic Chair for Medical
Microbiology and Virology at the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg and
is Director of the Institute for Medical Microbiology at the University
Hospital Halle.
On the occasion of the
outbreak in Northern Italy, he now called for extensive testing of “every case”
in Europe that can be associated with “serious respiratory infections”. The
virologist had already suggested this to the European Health ministers two
weeks ago. “The EU Health ministers did not agree with my suggestion, and now
we observe things unfolding in Italy.”
Meanwhile, he also
criticized the assessment of Germany´s Health Minister Jens Spahn and his
authority in terms of the danger that is associated with the novel Coronavirus.
“Above all, it is still the case that his authorities try to pretend as if the
novel Coronavirus would be more harmless than flu.”
According to the virologist,
the novel Coronavirus is “at least ten times more dangerous than flu” for those
who get infected. In contrast to a normal flu, the risk groups being associated
with the novel Coronavirus are still unknown.
“It’s a very different
situation,” says Kekulé. The novel Coronavirus is not only fatal from the
perspective of older or very young people, but for middle-aged people, too. On
top there is no existing vaccine for the novel Coronavirus and “that’s why I do
not understand why they’ve taken things so lightly thus far”.
If the German population is
learning one thing these days, it is that they are alone in the face of a
rapidly growing virus pandemic. At least it should be said with chancellor
Merkel hiding in the shadow that the Berlin government has managed to set up a
“crisis team” that includes the same government figures who have so far
reportedly played down the emerging crisis and – for whatever reason – have
taken things very lightly. This endangers people’s trust in the authorities.
So, my American fellows, and
now look at your “crisis team”: Health Zar Mike Pence, Steven Mnuchin and Larry
Kudlow. Jikes! Similar to the German perspective, this is certainly a “dream
team” to fight dangerous viruses! An ex-Goldman investment banker and a
former cocain addict whose economic assessments were often nothing
more but smoke and mirror in the past.
Have you ever wondered what
these people actually know about viruses?
Good luck with that and may
god be with us!!
Roman Baudzus is running his
own economics blog Wirtschaftsfacts on Cashkurs.com and has been contributor to
various economic or political websites such as Goldmoney.com, Goldseiten.de or
Heise/Telepolis.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.