Are These Deaths The Work Of The Clintons Or Is It The Deep State
Protecting Its Servants?
Are These Deaths The
Work Of The Clintons Or Is It The Deep State Protecting Its Servants?
Military/Security
Complex Comprise Hillary’s Praetorian Guard:
Lead Attorney In Anti-Clinton DNC Fraud Case Mysteriously Found Dead
Global Research,
August 08, 2016
Call it conspiracy theory, coincidence or just
bad luck, but any time someone is in a position to bring down Hillary Clinton
they wind up dead. In fact, as we noted previously, there’s a long history of
Clinton-related body counts, with scores of people dying under mysterious
circumstances. While Vince Foster remains the most infamous, the body
count is starting to build ominously this election cycle - from the mysterious “crushing his own throat”
death of a UN official to the latest death of an attorney who
served the DNC with a fraud suit.
As GatewayPundit’s Jim Hoft reports, on July 3, 2016, Shawn
Lucas and filmmaker Ricardo Villaba served the DNC Services Corp. and
Chairperson Debbie Wasserman Schultz at DNC’s headquarters in Washington, D.C.,
in the fraud class action suit against the Democrat Party on behalf of Bernie
Sanders supporters (this was before Wikileaks released documents proving
the DNC was working against the Sanders campaign during the 2016 primary).
Shawn Lucas was
thrilled about serving the papers to the DNC before Independence Day…
Shawn Lucas was found dead this week…
According to Snopes Lucas was found dead on his
bathroom floor.
We contacted
Lucas’ employer on 4 August 2016 to ask whether there was any truth to the
rumor.
According to an
individual with whom we spoke at that company, Shawn Lucas died on 2
August 2016. The audibly and understandably shaken employee stated that
interest in the circumstances of Lucas’ death had prompted a number of phone
calls and other queries, but the company had not yet ascertained any details
about Lucas’ cause of death and were unable to confirm anything more than the
fact he had passed away.
An unconfirmed
report holds that Lucas was found lying on the bathroom floor by his girlfriend
when she returned home on the evening of 2 August 2016. Paramedics
responding to her 911 call found no signs of life.
* *
*
Shortly after the killing, Redditors and social
media users were pursuing a “lead” saying that Rich was
en route to the FBI the morning of his murder, apparently intending to speak to
special agents about an “ongoing court case” possibly involving the Clinton
family.
So, to summarize, courtesy of Janet
Tavakoli, the Clinton related suspicious deaths so far this
election cycle: Five in just under six weeks – four deaths plus
one suicide…
1) Shawn Lucas, Sanders supporter who
served papers to DNC on the Fraud Case (DOD August 2, 2016)
2) Victor Thorn, Clinton author shot himself in an
apparent suicide. (DOD August, 2016)
3) Seth Conrad
Rich,
Democratic staffer, aged 27, apparently on his way to speak to the FBI about a
case possibly involving the Clintons. The D.C. murder was not a robbery. (DOD
July 8, 2016)
It must be
coincidence, right?
If former Secret Service agent Gary Byrne is to be
believed, this is business as usual for the Clintons. Excerpt
via Zero Hedge:
BYRNE: I
feel so strongly that people need to know the real Hillary Clinton and how
dangerous she is in her behavior. She is not a leader. She is not a leader.
SEAN: She does
not have the temperament?
BYRNE: She
doesn’t have the temperament. She didn’t have the temperament to handle
the social office when she was First Lady, she does not have the temperament.
SEAN: She’s
dishonest.
BYRNE: She’s
dishonest, she habitually lies, anybody that can separate themselves from their
politics and review her behavior over the past 15 years…
Pentagon, CIA Form
Praetorian Guard for Clinton as Warmonger President
Former director of the
Central Intelligence Agency Michael J Morell is the latest in a phalanx of
senior US military-intelligence figures who are shedding any pretense of
political neutrality and giving their full-throated endorsement to Democrat
presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
In a New York
Times opinion piece, Morell
starkly backed Clinton as the most «highly qualified to be
commander-in-chief… keeping our nation safe».
The ex-CIA chief’s op-ed
piece also served as a blunt hatchet job on Republican presidential rival
Donald J Trump. Morell said the New York billionaire-turned politician is «not
only unqualified for the job, but he may well pose a threat to our national
security».
The hoary, old
scare-theme of «national security» is being rehabilitated as the criterion for
electing Clinton. It also has the disturbing connotation of an increasingly
militarized totalitarian regime that the United States is becoming.
While showering Clinton
with glowing praise, the former CIA spymaster trounced Trump with a litany of
flaws, including «self-aggrandizement, his overreaction to perceived
slights, his tendency to make decisions based on intuition, his refusal to
change his views based on new information, his routine carelessness with the
facts, his unwillingness to listen to others and his lack of respect for the
rule of law».
Morell’s «coup de grace»
for Trump was that he was a «national security danger» owing to his alleged
indifference towards the US-led NATO military alliance and European security,
and unwillingness to confront Russia.
After accusing Trump of
being «careless with facts», Morell makes this reckless, sensationalist
claim: «In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr Putin had
recruited Mr Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation».
This is a breath-taking
interference in the nominally civilian sphere of US politics by unelected
military-paramilitary elements, whereby a candidate for presidency is accused of
being a foreign puppet. It is a throwback to the Cold War witch-hunting days of
McCarthy and «Un-American activities».
This very public
intervention by a top CIA figure in the US presidential election is an
extraordinarily brazen affront to constitutional norms. Traditionally, the
American military and intelligence apparatus has always been careful to assume
a neutral relation with regard to Washington politics – at least in public.
In the 2016 election,
however, the boundaries between civilian politics and the military powers are
being flagrantly jettisoned. The military and the Deep State cabal are, in
effect, moving to preordain the White House occupant. This situation has barely
perceptible difference from a military coup appointing a civilian junta to
administer.
At the Democrat National
Convention in Philadelphia last week, the endorsement of Hillary Clinton by
military top brass was conspicuous. One of the main Pentagon cheerleaders was
Four-Star Marine General John Allen, who gave a bloodcurdling and ranting
speech declaring how «our enemies will fear» an America led by
Clinton.
This rush to partisan
politics by the US military has even led to unease among certain Pentagon
quarters. Only days after the DNC’s militaristic rally, General Martin Dempsey,
who was formerly Chairman of the Joint Staffs, took the unprecedented step of
publishing a cautionary article warning: «Keep Your
Politics Private, My Fellow Generals and Admirals».
Dempsey did not mention
General Allen or others by name, but it was clear to whom he was referring and
the jingoistic display in support of Clinton. And it was also clear that
Dempsey saw the open embrace of partisan politics by the Pentagon as a worrying
development undermining democracy in the US. He feared «the erosion of
civil-military relations».
What is that qualifies
Hillary Clinton for such support? Former CIA boss Morell listed these
«attributes» as «her belief that America is an exceptional nation that
must lead in the world for the country to remain secure and prosperous; her
understanding that diplomacy can be effective only if the country is perceived
as willing and able to use force if necessary; and, most important, her
capacity to make the most difficult decision of all – whether to put young
American women and men in harm’s way».
In other words, what is
most appreciated is how Clinton is prepared and willing to take America into
ever more wars. Despite the horrific legacy that she is already responsible as
Secretary of State in the Obama administration (2009-2013) when she prosecuted
wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and, covertly, in Syria and Ukraine.
And yet, ex-CIA chief
Morell, who served alongside Clinton in these disastrous wars, has the gall to
censure Trump for «his lack of respect for the rule of law».
By contrast, Trump, for
all his flaws and awry views on immigration and race relations, has not espoused
warmongering zeal to any comparable extent. Indeed, the Republican candidate
has called for normalization of relations with Russia in particular and has
notified that he would order a withdrawal of US forces from Asia, Europe and
other regions in order to «rebuild America first». His views on not rushing
into a hypothetical war to defend NATO Baltic nations from a far-fetched
Russian invasion are seen by many ordinary Americans as a common sense
position. For the Pentagon-CIA nexus, however, Trump’s views are anathema.
This is what it gets down
to. Clinton is the candidate of choice for the US military-industrial complex
because she will enhance corporate profits and a $600-billion annual budget
that feeds the Pentagon-CIA leviathan.
Crucial to this role is
reinforcing a belligerent foreign policy towards the world in general and
towards Russia in particular. Or, as Morell puts it, Clinton’s «belief
that America is an exceptional nation that must lead in the world for the
country to remain secure and prosperous».
It is this exceptional,
supremacist Washington ideology that has brought the world to such a dangerous
precipice.
Hillary Clinton,
ironically, far more than the maverick Donald Trump, is proving to be an
exemplar of what can only be called the Neo-fascist ideology that is becoming
increasingly extant in Washington.
The Pentagon-CIA
Praetorian Guard that is being formed around Clinton is not only a harbinger of
the militarized totalitarian state administered from Washington; it is also a
signal that the United States is moving openly to a policy of unabashed,
unrestrained permanent war against any foreign country it so deems.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.