Washington Has
Reestablished Financial and Political Control Over Brazil
Washington Has
Reestablished Financial and Political Control Over Brazil
Washington’s opportunity
came when the corrupt Brazilian elite illegally removed the elected president
from office in order to stop government investigations of their illegal
activities. Washington approved the coup with the provision that Washington’s Wall
Street allies would control Brazil’s financial offices.
The BRICS are now reduced
to the RICS, and Washington also has targeted the I (India) and the S (South
Africa). Russia and China should expect disinformation from Washington designed
to cause mutual suspicion and to erode their alliance.
Guest Column by Professor
Michel Chossudovsky
Wall Street Behind Brazil
Coup d’Etat
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Control over monetary
policy and macro-economic reform was the ultimate objective of the Coup d’Etat.
The key appointments from Wall Street’s standpoint are the Central Bank, which
dominates monetary policy as well as foreign exchange transactions,
the Ministry of Finance and the Bank of Brazil (Banco do
Brasil).
On behalf of Wall Street
and the “Washington consensus”, the interim post coup “government” of Michel
Temer has appointed a former Wall Street CEO (with U.S citizenship) to
head the Ministry of Finance.
Henrique de Campos
Meirelles, a former President of FleetBoston Financial’s Global Banking
(1999-2002) and former head of the Central Bank under Lula’s presidency was
appointed minister of finance on May 12.
Ilan
Goldfajn [Goldfein] appointed to head the Central Bank, was chief
economist of Itaú, Brazil’s largest private bank. Goldfajn [Goldfein] has close
ties to both the IMF and the World Bank. He is a financial crony of Meirelles.
Historical Background
Brazil’s currency system under the Real is heavily dollarised. Internal debt
operations are conducive to a rising external debt. Wall Street is intent upon
maintaining Brazil in a monetary straightjacket.
Since the government of
Fernando Henrique Cardoso, Wall Street has exerted control over key economic
appointments including the Ministry of Finance, the Bank of Brazil and
the Central Bank. Under the governments of Fernando Henrique Cardoso
and Luis Ignacio da Silva (Lula), the appointment of the governor of
the Central Bank was approved by Wall Street.
Arminio Fraga: president of
the Central Bank (4 March 1999 – 1 January 2003) hedge
fund manager and associate of George Soros, Quantum Fund, New York,
Dual Citizenship Brazil-US.
Henrique de Campos
Meirelles, President of Central Bank, ( January 1, 2003 – January 1,
2011). Dual Citizenship Brazil-US.
President and COO of Bank Boston (1996-99) and President of FleetBoston
Financial’s Global Banking (1999-2002). In 20o4, FleetBoston merged with Bank
America. Prior to the merger with Bank America, FleetBoston was the Seventh
largest Bank in the US. Bank America is currently the second largest bank in
the US.
After having been dismissed by Dilma in 2010, Meirelles made a come back. He
was appointed Minister of Finance by the “interim President” Michel Temer.
Ilan Goldfajn, chief
economist of Itaú, Brazil’s largest private bank. Goldfajn [Goldfein] was
appointed by Michel Temer interim “government” to head the Central Bank. (May
16, 2016). Dual Citizenship Israel-Brazil.
Goldfajn had previously worked at the Central Bank under Arminio Fraga as
well as under Henrique Mereilles. He has close personal ties to Prof. Stanley
Fischer, currently Vice-Chair of the US Federal Reserve. Needless to say
Golfajn’s appointment to the Central Bank was approved by the IMF, the US
Treasury, Wall Street and the US Federal Reserve.
It is worth noting that Stanley Fischer had previously held the position of of
Deputy Managing Director of the IMF and Governor of the Central Bank of Israel.
Both Fischer and Goldfajn are Israeli citizens, with ties to the pro-Israel
lobby.
Historical Background
In early 1999, in the immediate wake of the speculative onslaught against
Brazil’s national currency (Real), the president of the Central Bank Professor
Francisco Lopez (who had been appointed on January 13th Black Wednesday 1999)
was sacked shortly thereafter and replaced by Arminio Fraga, a US citizen and
employee of George Soros’ Quantum Fund in New York.
“The fox had been appointed to guard the chicken coop”.
More concretely Wall Street speculators were in charge of Brazil’s monetary
policy.
Under Lula, Henrique Campos de Meirelles was appointed President of the
Central Bank of Brazil. He had acted previously as president and CEO within
one of Wall Street’s largest financial institutions. FleetBoston was the
second largest creditor of Brazil, after Citigroup. To say the least, he was in
conflict of interest. His appointment was agreed upon prior to Lula’s accession
to the presidency.
Henrique Meirelles was a staunch supporter of Argentina’s controversial Plan
Cavallo in the 1990s: a Wall Street “stabilization plan” which wreaked economic
and social havoc. The essential structure of Argentina’s Cavallo Plan was
replicated in Brazil under the Real Plan, namely the enforcement of a
dollarised convertible national currency (Real). What this scheme implies is
that the internal debt is transformed into a dollar denominated external debt.
Upon Dilma’s accession to the presidency in 2011, Meirielles was not renewed as
president of the Central Bank.
Sovereignty in Monetary
Policy
Finance Minister Mereilles under the interim “government” supports the
so-called “independence of the Central Bank”. The application of this fake
concept implies that the government should not intervene in Central Bank
decisions. But there are no restrictions on “Wall Street Foxes”.
The issue of sovereignty in monetary policy is crucial. The objective of the
coup d’Etat was to deny Brazil’s sovereignty in the formulation of
macro-economic policy.
Wall Street Fox
Under Dilma, the “tradition” of selecting a “Wall Street fox” had been
abandoned with the appointment of Alexandre Antônio Tombini, a career
government official, who headed the Central Bank of Brazil from 2011 to
May 2016.
Upon Michel Temer’s accession as “interim president”, Henrique Campos de
Meirelles was appointed to head the Ministry of Finance. In turn, Meirelles
appointed his own cronies to head the Central Bank and the Banco do Brasil.
Meirelles was described by the US media as “market friendly”.
Michel Temer’s Economic
appointments:
Henrique de Campos Meirelles, Minister of Finance,
Ilan Golfajn, President of the Central Bank of Brazil, crony appointed by
Meirelles
Paulo Caffarelli, Bank of Brazil, crony appointed by Meirelles
Concluding Remarks:
What is at stake through various mechanisms–including intelligence ops,
financial manipulation, media propaganda–is the outright destabilization
of Brazil’s state structure and national economy, not to mention the mass
impoverishment of the Brazilian people.
The US does not want to deal or negotiate with a sovereign
reformist nationalist government. What it wants is a compliant US
proxy state.
Lula was “acceptable” because he followed the instructions of Wall Street and
the IMF.
While the neoliberal policy agenda prevailed under Rousseff, a
reformist-populist agenda was also implemented which departed from the Wall
Street sponsored macroeconomic mainstay during the Lula presidency. According
to IMF’s Managing Director Heinrich Koeller (2003) Lula was “Our best
president”:
“I am enthusiastic [with Lula’s administration]; but it is better to say I am
deeply impressed by President Lula” (IMF Press Conference, 2003).
Under Lula, there was not need for “regime change”. Luis Ignacio da Silva had
endorsed the “Washington Consensus”.
The temporary demise of
Henrique de Campos Meirelles following the election of Dilma Rousseff was
crucial. Wall Street had not approved Dilma’s appointments to the Central Bank
and the Ministry of Finance.
If Dilma had chosen to retain Henrique de Campos Meirelles, the Coup d’Etat
would most probably not have taken place.
The US Proxy Regime in
Brasilia
A former CEO/president of one of America’s largest financial institutions (and
a US citizen) controls Brazil’s key financial institutions and sets the
macroeconomic and monetary agenda for a country of more than 200 Million
people.
It is called a Coup d’Etat…
by Wall Street.
Copyright © Prof Michel
Chossudovsky, Global Research, 2016
Washington Is Using Russia’s Reliance on Diplomacy To Revive ISIS And To Involve Russia In Long-Term War In Syria
Russia’s Use Of Force Was Highly Successful, but is being undermined by resort to fruitless diplomacy.
by Stephen Lendman
Make no mistake. Putin’s strategic intervention in Syria last September was a bold, vital step. He deserves credit and praise for taking it.
Things changed dramatically on the ground. Reinvigorated government forces retook large swaths of earlier lost territory, freeing them from the scourge of US-sponsored terrorism.
At the same time, Russia’s all-out efforts for ceasefire and conflict resolution peace talks failed. On the one hand, the alternative is endless war. On the other, the only language America understands is force.
Moscow’s genuine diplomatic efforts can’t succeed because it has no peace partner in Washington – under Obama or whoever succeeds him.
It’s time to accept reality and act boldly, assertively and unilaterally against all terrorist groups in Syria rejecting ceasefire, Moscow following through on its earlier commitment, repeated as recently as late May and early June – so far not implemented.
Russia’s Foreign Ministry and General Staff Main Operational Directorate head General Sergei Rudskoy issued similar statements in March, saying unilateral airstrikes will target ceasefire violators – at the same time accusing Washington of failing to work cooperatively to implement Security Council 2254 provisions.
They call for ceasefire and diplomatic conflict resolution. Russia genuinely pursues both objectives. America obstructs them.
Endless fighting rages. Washington wants war, not peace, regime change called political transition. Geneva I, II and III failed. Nothing suggests better prospects ahead.
Russia’s failure to follow through on its commitment gave ISIS, Jabhat al-Nusra (Al Qaeda in Syria) and other terrorist groups time to regroup, rearm and replenish their ranks – with help from Washington, NATO (notably Turkey), Israel, Saudi Arabia and other regional rogue states.
Russia’s repeated calls for Washington to work cooperatively against terrorism in Syria remain unanswered.
On Saturday, Sergey Lavrov again expressed concern about US delaying tactics. Russia’s Foreign Ministry said he and John Kerry continue discussing the situation on the ground without agreement, explaining:
“…Lavrov has expressed concern (about US) attempts to delay resuming political talks for various artificial reasons, which was seen clearly during the UN Security Council briefing on Syria on June 3.”
On June 5, Tass reported terrorist shelling of Syrian cities and towns in the last 24 hours alone killed over 270 civilians, injuring hundreds more.
The Russian Coordination Center said terrorist groups breached cessation of hostilities in the last 24 hours 10 times in Aleppo and Damascus – 626 times since ceasefire took effect at midnight last February 26.
Washington wants its terrorist foot soldiers protected, outrageously telling Russia to stop attacking Jabhat al-Nusra fighters, wanting heroic efforts by government forces obstructed and defeated.
The Obama administration continues providing terrorists with arms and other material support. Reports indicate increasing Russian airstrikes. There’s more.
According to Al Monitor, “the Russians this week disembarked ground forces and paratroopers in the port of Tartus to support more than 3,000 Russian volunteers dispatched to the region in the past few weeks, in a bid to revive coordination with the Syrian army.”
“This represents yet another additional indication that a wide-ranging operation is being prepared” – likely in Raqqa and Aleppo provinces.
According to Syrian sources, Russia’s joint command staff, handling aerial operations, returned to Khmeimim air base in likely preparation for new combat operations.
It’s time to deal with Washington and its rogue allies in the only language they understand – by resuming large-scale aerial strikes like earlier, intensifying them, regaining the offensive decisively, not letting up, smashing all terrorist elements failing to observe ceasefire.
Liberating Syria depends on it. Negotiating with Washington won’t end well.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.ne
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.