How To Spot A False Flag Event

How To Spot A False Flag Event

June 30, 2016 

How To Spot A False Flag Event

The telltale signs of false flag operations:

http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/how-spot-false-flag-event/ri15316

http://theantimedia.org/5-confirmed-false-flag-operations/

“Obviously, the ‘no conspiracy’ group is contributing greatly to the demise of liberty by their unwillingness to even examine the evidence suggesting government conspiracies. Truly, they are shutting their eyes ‘against a painful truth.’ And, unfortunately, this group is most prevalent among pastors, Christians, and churches.”

 

How To Spot A False Flag Event

"For the most part, the mainstream media is little more than a propaganda ministry for the federal government."

Chuck Baldwin 

Originally appeared at Chuck Baldwin LIVE

A missionary friend of mine in Eastern Europe recently gave me a heads up regarding an excellent article written by Sebastian Swift entitled "5 Confirmed False Flag Operations And How To Spot Them In The Future."

Swift writes, "The false flag phenomenon is distinctively modern and used as an ideological weapon to control populations with the fear of a manufactured enemy. They are used in ostensibly democratic systems where people believe they have inalienable rights. Such democratic systems--primarily the United States, Israel, and Great Britain--must shock people into sociopolitical and geopolitical consent and, as such, require sophisticated modern propaganda systems and advanced covert operations teams with highly proficient skills."

Vote for Hillary and Destroy the World

Vote for Hillary and Destroy the World

June 30, 2016 

Vote for Hillary and Destroy the World

http://newobserveronline.com/clinton-destroy-syria-israel/

Clinton: Destroy Syria for Israel

MAY 22, 2016 BY TNO STAFF— IN MIDDLE EAST · 51 COMMENTS

A newly-released Hilary Clinton email confirmed that the Obama administration has deliberately provoked the civil war in Syria as the “best way to help Israel.”

In an indication of her murderous and psychopathic nature, Clinton also wrote that it was the “right thing” to personally threaten Bashar Assad’s family with death.

In the email, released by Wikileaks, then Secretary of State Clinton says that the “best way to help Israel” is to “use force” in Syria to overthrow the government.

The document was one of many unclassified by the US Department of State under case number F-2014-20439, Doc No. C05794498, following the uproar over Clinton’s private email server kept at her house while she served as Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013.

Although the Wikileaks transcript dates the email as December 31, 2000, this is an error on their part, as the contents of the email (in particular the reference to May 2012 talks between Iran and the west over its nuclear program in Istanbul) show that the email was in fact sent on December 31, 2012.

The email makes it clear that it has been US policy from the very beginning to violently overthrow the Syrian government—and specifically to do this because it is in Israel’s interests.

“The best way to help Israel deal with Iran’s growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad,” Clinton forthrightly starts off by saying.

Even though all US intelligence reports had long dismissed Iran’s “atom bomb” program as a hoax (a conclusion supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency), Clinton continues to use these lies to “justify” destroying Syria in the name of Israel.

She specifically links Iran’s mythical atom bomb program to Syria because, she says, Iran’s “atom bomb” program threatens Israel’s “monopoly” on nuclear weapons in the Middle East.

If Iran were to acquire a nuclear weapon, Clinton asserts, this would allow Syria (and other “adversaries of Israel” such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt) to “go nuclear as well,” all of which would threaten Israel’s interests.

Therefore, Clinton, says, Syria has to be destroyed.

Iran’s nuclear program and Syria’s civil war may seem unconnected, but they are. What Israeli military leaders really worry about — but cannot talk about — is losing their nuclear monopoly.

An Iranian nuclear weapons capability would not only end that nuclear monopoly but could also prompt other adversaries, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to go nuclear as well. The result would be a precarious nuclear balance in which Israel could not respond to provocations with conventional military strikes on Syria and Lebanon, as it can today.

If Iran were to reach the threshold of a nuclear weapons state, Tehran would find it much easier to call on its allies in Syria and Hezbollah to strike Israel, knowing that its nuclear weapons would serve as a deterrent to Israel responding against Iran itself.

It is, Clinton continues, the “strategic relationship between Iran and the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria” that makes it possible for Iran to undermine Israel’s security.

This would not come about through a “direct attack,” Clinton admits, because “in the thirty years of hostility between Iran and Israel” this has never occurred, but through its alleged “proxies.”

The end of the Assad regime would end this dangerous alliance. Israel’s leadership understands well why defeating Assad is now in its interests.

Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel’s security, it would also ease Israel’s understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly.

Then, Israel and the United States might be able to develop a common view of when the Iranian program is so dangerous that military action could be warranted.

Clinton goes on to asset that directly threatening Bashar Assad “and his family” with violence is the “right thing” to do:

In short, the White House can ease the tension that has developed with Israel over Iran by doing the right thing in Syria.

With his life and his family at risk, only the threat or use of force will change the Syrian dictator Bashar Assad’s mind.

The email proves—as if any more proof was needed—that the US government has been the main sponsor of the growth of terrorism in the Middle East, and all in order to “protect” Israel.

It is also a sobering thought to consider that the “refugee” crisis which currently threatens to destroy Europe, was directly sparked off by this US government action as well, insofar as there are any genuine refugees fleeing the civil war in Syria.

In addition, over 250,000 people have been killed in the Syrian conflict, which has spread to Iraq—all thanks to Clinton and the Obama administration backing the “rebels” and stoking the fires of war in Syria.

The real and disturbing possibility that a psychopath like Clinton—whose policy has inflicted death and misery upon millions of people—could become the next president of America is the most deeply shocking thought of all.

Clinton’s public assertion that, if elected president, she would “take the relationship with Israel to the next level,” would definitively mark her, and Israel, as the enemy of not just some Arab states in the Middle East, but of all peace-loving people on earth.

AP, CNN, NYT Sue For Phone Records of Orlando Shooting

AP, CNN, NYT Sue For Phone Records of Orlando Shooting

June 29, 2016 

AP, CNN, NYT Sue For Phone Records of Orlando Shooting

As in the case of the government’s refusal to release videos that would prove or disprove the claim that an airliner hit the Pentagon on 9/11/01, government refuses to release alleged phone records that could support or not support the official Orlando story.

We should always be suspicious when government refuses to release evidence that the government says proves its case.

https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/06/24/orlando-mass-shooting-news-orgs-file-lawsuit-to-access-crucial-public-records/

Powerful Interest Groups Have Triumphed Over The Rule Of Law

Powerful Interest Groups Have Triumphed Over The Rule Of Law

June 29, 2016 

Powerful Interest Groups Have Triumphed Over The Rule Of Law

This from a reader:

“It was reported this morning that recently the jet that Attorney General Loretta Lynch was on just happened to be on the same ramp as the one carrying  Bill Clinton.

“And somehow each party apparently knew of the presence of the other.

“And they were in close enough proximity that Bill and Loretta met privately in one of the jets.

“The FBI (a department under the AG) is investigating Hillary’s emails as  a criminal violation of the espionage act and the funding of the Clinton Foundation by foreign interests.

“Seems to me that this is more than coincidental and is highly irregular for a prosecuting official to meet privately with a potential defendant—or husband of a potential defendant.

“Wonder who’s jet they met on?   Did the AG go to Bill’s jet?  Wouldn’t that be particularly unusual? Did Bill go over to the AG’s jet, and if so why would the AG allow it and precipitate such a conflict of interests?”

Here is confirmation that this meeting did occur:

There was a half hour meeting on the AG’s plane. Watch the news video from ABC 15:

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/06/ag-loretta-lynch-half-hour-meeting-bill-clinton-airplane-says-talked-grandchildren-video/

http://www.abc15.com/news/region-phoenix-metro/central-phoenix/loretta-lynch-bill-clinton-meet-privately-in-phoenix

Where To Invade Next by Michael Moore

Where To Invade Next by Michael Moore

June 29, 2016 

Where To Invade Next by Michael Moore

Michael Moore’s latest film is worth watching, because it shows how inhumane life in American society is compared to countries in Europe. Moore allows Europeans to make the point that to live life in America is to live in Hell. Compared to civilized societies, American society is primative and barbaric.

Europeans regard America as “exceptional” only in its social backwardness and lack of social compassion.

John Whitehead provides more evidence that proves Europeans are correct in their conclusion:https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/06/john-w-whitehead/death-4th-amendment/

‘We the Prisoners’: The Demise of the Fourth Amendment

By John W. Whitehead

The Rutherford Institute

“Our carceral state banishes American citizens to a gray wasteland far beyond the promises and protections the government grants its other citizens… When the doors finally close and one finds oneself facing banishment to the carceral state—the years, the walls, the rules, the guards, the inmates—reactions vary. Some experience an intense sickening feeling. Others, a strong desire to sleep. Visions of suicide. A deep shame. A rage directed toward guards and other inmates. Utter disbelief. The incarcerated attempt to hold on to family and old social ties through phone calls and visitations. At first, friends and family do their best to keep up. But phone calls to prison are expensive, and many prisons are located far from one’s hometown… As the visits and phone calls diminish, the incarcerated begins to adjust to the fact that he or she is, indeed, a prisoner. New social ties are cultivated. New rules must be understood.”—Ta-Nehisi Coates, The Atlantic

The Collapse of Western Democracy — Paul Craig Roberts

The Collapse of Western Democracy — Paul Craig Roberts

June 29, 2016 

The Collapse of Western Democracy

Paul Craig Roberts

Democracy no longer exists in the West. In the US powerful private interest groups, such as the military-security complex, Wall Street, the Israel Lobby, agribusiness and the extractive industries of energy, timber and mining, have long exercised more control over government than the people. But now even the semblance of democracy has been abandoned.

In the US Donald Trump has won the Republican presidential nomination. However, Republican convention delegates are plotting to deny Trump the nomination that the people have voted him. The Republican political establishment is showing an unwillingness to accept democratic outcomes.
The people chose, but their choice is unacceptable to the establishment which intends to substitute its choice for the people’s choice.

Do you remember Dominic Strauss-Kahn? Strauss-Kahn is the Frenchman who was head of the IMF and, according to polls, the likely next president of France. He said something that sounded too favorable toward the Greek people. This concerned powerful banking interests who worried that he might get in the way of their plunder of Greece, Portugal, Spain, and Italy. A hotel maid appeared who accused him of rape. He was arrested and held without bail. After the police and prosecutors had made fools of themselves, he was released with all charges dropped. But the goal was achieved. Strauss-Kahn had to resign as IMF director and kiss goodbye his chance for the presidency of France.

Curious, isn’t it, that a woman has now appeared who claims Trump raped her when she was 13 years old.

Consider the political establishment’s response to the Brexit vote. Members of Parliament are saying that the vote is unacceptable and that Parliament has the right and responsibility to ignore the voice of the people.

The view now established in the West is that the people are not qualified to make political decisions. The position of the opponents of Brexit is clear: it simply is not a matter for the British people whether their sovereignty is given away to an unaccountable commission in Brussels.

Martin Schultz, President of the EU Parliament, puts it clearly: “It is not the EU philosophy that the crowd can decide its fate.”

The Western media have made it clear that they do not accept the people’s decision either. The vote is said to be “racist” and therefore can be disregarded as illegitimate.

Washington has no intention of permitting the British to exit the European Union. Washington did not work for 60 years to put all of Europe in the EU bag that Washington can control only to let democracy undo its achievement.

The Federal Reserve, its Wall Street allies, and its Bank of Japan and European Central Bank vassals will short the UK pound and equities, and the presstitutes will explain the decline in values as “the market’s” pronouncement that the British vote was a mistake. If Britain is actually permitted to leave, the two-year long negotiations will be used to tie the British into the EU so firmly that Britain leaves in name only.

No one with a brain believes that Europeans are happy that Washington and NATO are driving them into conflict with Russia. Yet their protests have no effect on their governments.

Consider the French protests of what the neoliberal French government, masquerading as socialist, calls “labor law reforms.” What the “reform” does is to take away the reforms that the French people achieved over decades of struggle. The French made employment more stable and less uncertain, thereby reducing stress and contributing to the happiness of life. But the corporations want more profit and regard regulations and laws that benefit people as barriers to higher profitability. Neoliberal economists backed the takeback of French labor rights with the false argument that a humane society causes unemployment. The neoliberal economists call it “liberating the employment market” from reforms achieved by the French people.

The French government, of course, represents corporations, not the French people.

The neoliberal economists and politicians have no qualms about sacrificing the quality of French life in order to clear the way for global corporations to make more profits. What is the value in “the global market” when the result is to worsen the fate of peoples?

Consider the Germans. They are being overrun with refugees from Washington’s wars, wars that the stupid German government enabled. The German people are experiencing increases in crime and sexual attacks. They protest, but their government does not hear them. The German government is more concerned about the refugees than it is about the German people.

Consider the Greeks and the Portuguese forced by their governments to accept personal financial ruin in order to boost the profits of foreign banks. These governments represent foreign bankers, not the Greek and Portuguese people.

One wonders how long before all Western peoples conclude that only a French Revolution complete with guillotine can set them free.

Have the Neocon Nazis And Their False Flag Attacks Destroyed America? Apparently, Yes.

Have the Neocon Nazis And Their False Flag Attacks Destroyed America? Apparently, Yes.

June 28, 2016 

Have the Neocon Nazis And Their False Flag Attacks Destroyed America? Apparently, Yes.

Guest Column by John W. Whitehead

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article44960.htm

http://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/a_week_in_the_life_of_the_american_police_state

A Week in the Life of the American Police State

By John W. Whitehead

June 20, 2016

“Those who corrupt the public mind are just as evil as those who steal from the public purse.”

Adlai Stevenson, 23rd Vice President of the United States

If you’ve been caught up in the circus that is the presidential election, you’ve likely missed the latest news about all the ways in which the government continues to erode our freedoms, undermine our sovereignty, abuse our trust, invade our homes, invade our privacy, destroy our property, hijack our bank accounts, and generally render itself above the law.

Then again, this is all par for the course from a militaristic government that is armed to the teeth, wages war against its own people, imprisons its citizens for profit, marches in lockstep with the corporate elite, and treats human beings as little more than cattle to be branded, bought, sold and butchered.

The following incidents constitute a typical week in the life of the American police state.

Not content with merely spying on our emails and phone calls, the NSA wants to spy on thermostats, refrigerators, and pacemakers.

Reinforcing fears about how easily surveillance technology can be abused by government officials, local police in California are using money acquired through asset forfeiture to buy surveillance equipment that was then used to blackmail city council members.

Small-town police departments continue to militarize their forces, acquiring military equipment such as BearCat armored vehicles and SWAT teams at an alarming rate.

According to the Government Accountability Office, the majority of people in the government’s criminal face-recognition database have never committed a crime.

The private prison business is booming, signaling a profitable windfall for investors and a death knell for any American unfortunate enough to run afoul of the many laws criminalizing otherwise legitimate behavior such as growing a garden on one’s front lawn or hosting a Bible study in one’s backyard.

In fact, one Florida couple recently sued their town council after being threatened with fines under a law banning front-yard gardens.

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled that as long as the government shows “good faith,” it can search your digital files as much as it wants.

The FBI and other government agencies have been hiding cameras in city utility poles in order to carry out warrantless, covert surveillance on Americans.

The USDA and EPA have been using SWAT teams to conduct raids on raw milk producers, beekeepers and lemon growers, among others.

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Americans have no expectation of privacy when it comes to credit card magnetic strips. Translation: swiping a credit card to determine its legitimacy is not a search under the Fourth Amendment.

Sex scandals involving police officers—the latest involving police and sex workers in California—are revealing yet another sordid side of the abuses being perpetrated by government officials as they carry out their “official” duties.

The University of Oklahoma is preparing to launch a 24/7 hotline for students to report incidents of microaggressions and bias.

The government’s active shooter, crisis actor terror drills continue to blur the line between what is real and staged. In Fenway Park, a multi-agency counterterrorism exercise managed to fool even local media with its simulated explosions and gunfire, reports of active shooters and bombs, bomb-sniffing dogs, and fake victims, blood smeared on their faces, running from the park with hands in the air.

The Drug Enforcement Administration is fighting for warrantless access to Americans’ private medical files, including what prescriptions you might be on, as part of its so-called war on drugs.

Two police training academies have been suspended for what appears to be teaching the use of excessive force.

Belying its claims of neutrality, among the 426 organizations the IRS has been accused of targeting for increased scrutiny, a large subsection of the groups have the word “tea” in their name, 33 have “patriot,” 26 refer to “liberty,” and several others have “occupy” in their name.

The FBI is pushing Congress for access to Internet browser history without a warrant. The agency also wants to keep its biometric database secret and exempt from privacy laws.

Using video analytics technology that can detect “suspicious” behavior, the government is looking to tap into surveillance cameras in order to identify “people and objects who could present a threat, or individuals and items that might have been involved in a past crime.”

According to recent figures, people with severe untreated mental illness are 16 times more likely to be killed in a police encounter.

Michigan is creating a pilot program to allow police to carry out roadside drug testing, opening the door to further forced searches in violation of a driver’s right to bodily integrity.

If a new tech start-up gets its way, landlords and employers will eventually be able to strip-mine intimate data from your Facebook page, including entire conversation threads and private messages.

Facebook may also be listening in on your phone conversations all of the time.

According to EPA data, drinking water sources in communities across America may be contaminated beyond what is being reported.

Despite government efforts to appear transparent and receptive to input on its drone programs, secret documents reveal that the government’s secret drone task force ignored public concerns about drone surveillance.

Taking the risk of government surveillance to all-new levels and moving us that much closer to realizing the fictional world of Minority Report, “biohackers” are putting microchips and magnets in their bodies to enable them to communicate electronically with their surroundings.

Further legitimizing corrupt asset forfeiture schemes, the Texas Supreme Court has ruled that law enforcement can seize private property that was used in the commission of a crime, even if evidence of wrongdoing was illegally obtained by police.

Despite a mounting body of evidence—and dead bodies—proving that tasers can kill, police officers continue to use the so-called nonlethal weapons recklessly, leaving those victims who survive the shock permanently disabled.

As a testament to the transformation of the nation’s public schools into quasi-prisons, more than 1.6 million high school students now attend schools with police on campus but not a single guidance counselor.

In Oklahoma, highway patrols are rolling out a new asset forfeiture program that allows them to access and transfer any funds on prepaid credit cards directly to police bank accounts.

Finally, in a recent interview, former congressman Ron Paul voiced what so many of us have  been warning for years now: we no longer really have democracy in America.

Rather, as I point out in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, what we have is a political distraction that keeps us oblivious to the steady advance of the police state, deaf to the cries of its victims, blind to the damage its wreaking on our communities and silent in the face of tyranny.

As always, I am asked: what can Americans do about the incessant assault on their freedoms?

For starters, wake up. Stop allowing yourselves to be easily distracted by pointless political spectacles and pay attention to what’s really going on in the country.

The real battle in 2016 for control of this nation is not being waged between Republicans and Democrats in the ballot box. The real battle for control of this nation is taking place on roadsides, in police cars, on witness stands, over phone lines, in government offices, in corporate offices, in public school hallways and classrooms, in parks and city council meetings.

Wake up, America. The real battle between freedom and tyranny is taking place right in front of our eyes, if we would only open them.

WC: 1260

Os britânicos acordaram – Será que os norte-americanos também poderão acordar? Paul Craig Roberts

Relatório para os Apoiantes

Os cidadãos britânicos acordaram – Será que os norte-americanos também poderão acordar?

Paul Craig Roberts

Grato pelo apoio que dão a este site e pelas palavras de encorajamento e apreço que me enviam. O site é o resultado do vosso apelo para que eu saia da inactividade. É lido extensamente e é traduzido em línguas estrangeiras.

Tento ler cada email, mas não me é possível ler e comentar todos os diversos e variados artigos e livros que me enviam ou responder às vossas perguntas sobre uma enorme série de assuntos, muitos dos quais desconheço.

Este site representa uma grande tarefa. Presentemente, ser sincero é ser provocador. Escrever de maneira agressiva deixa pouca margem para erros ou distorções como, hoje em dia,  a suavização da língua as designa. Eu poderia ser desonesto e escrever a favor do poder estabelecido, do governo e estar errado 98% e nada seria dito sobre tal facto. Mas não há perdão para quem se arroga o direito a dizer a verdade, de maneira a provocar a reflexão dos leitores sobre o texto exposto.

Os meus leitores têm uma mentalidade aberta e inquisidora e querem saber a verdade dos factos. Os vossos motivos não são para proteger ilusões e desilusões ou para reforçar as vossas necessidades emocionais. Por esta razão é que escrevo para vós.

Se ninguém conhece ou respeita a verdade, o mundo está perdido. Mas só são necessários poucos, para mudar o mundo. A antropóloga cultural, Margaret Mead,  disse: "Nunca duvidem que um pequeno grupo de cidadãos comprometidos e que raciocinam, possa mudar o mundo; na verdade, é a única coisa que sempre o conseguiu."

A mudança pode ser para melhor ou para pior. O Presidente Reagan e algumas pessoas comprometidas venceram a resistência da CIA e do complexo militar de segurança e reduziram as tensões entre as potências nucleares, quando negociaram o fim da Guerra Fria com o líder soviético Gorbachev. Durante a governação dos três últimos presidentes dos EUA, alguns neoconservadores ressuscitaram as tensões nucleares e conduziram-nas para um nível mais elevado do que o que existia no auge da Guerra Fria.

Há sinais auspiciosos de que a motivação neoconservadora para a III Guerra Mundial pode ser desviada. Parece que, finalmente, os russos perceberam que a América não é o Santo Graal, mas um governo que lembra a Alemanha nazi, pela sua capacidade de agressão. Felizmente, as contramedidas dos russos vão obrigar os neoconservadores enlouquecidos a pensar duas vezes.

O povo britânico, ou melhor ainda, a maioria dos que votaram, surpreendeu o Establishment/o poder instituído, que confiava no êxito da sua propaganda, quando votaram para evitar que o seu país  - antigo e ilustre, fonte de liberdade - desaparecesse dentro da União Europeia, que é uma ditadura governada por pessoas nomeadas e que são irresponsáveis. Os britânicos tiveram experiência suficiente desses factos com a monarquia e decidiram que o futuro não deve ser um retrocesso. A votação britânica a favor da saída poderia trazer a consequência não intencional de explicar a realidade dos factos sobre a União Europeia e sobre a NATO, reduzindo assim a capacidade do governo de Washington, de fomentar a guerra.

Os americanos precisam de decidir se, tal como os britânicos, não gostam de retroceder para épocas piores.

Os Clinton e o Senador Republicano do Texas, Phil Gramm, levaram a América de regresso aos dias de Robber Baron devido à desregulamentação do sistema financeiro.

http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1877351_1877350_1877330,00.html

O senador foi recompensado com um cargo bancário milionário para derrubar a legislação da era da Grande Depressão que tornou o capitalismo financeiro viável. Os americanos precisam compreender que os capitalistas não se importam se o capitalismo funciona para cada um de vós, desde que funcione para eles.

O colapso da União Soviética, devido à prisão de Gorbachev por elementos da linha dura do Partido Comunista, deu origem aos neoconservadores norte-americanos, um duplo punhado de pessoas intimamente ligadas ao governo israelita. Para benefíciar Israel, este pequeno número de pessoas envolveu a América em 15 anos de guerra que, destruiu sete países e que custou aos americanos, aproximadamente 7 triliões de dólares, de acordo com Joseph Stiglitz   e Linda Bilmes .

Obviamente, a falsa desculpa para a destruição dos povos e dos recursos é o mito do "terrorismo". A maioria dos "acontecimentos terroristas" nos EUA foram acções de subterfúgios, organizadas pelo FBI, a fim de recolher a recompensa multimilionária que o Congresso concede para prevenir os acontecimentos terroristas. Qual é a melhor forma de manter esta benesse do que organizar um acto terrorista e impedi-lo? É discutível se as ocorrências como  o 11 de Setembro, o atentado bombista da Maratona de Boston, os tiroteios de Sandy Hook, San Bernandino e Orlando são operações de bandeira falsa ou se são exercícios encenados por actores em crise e apresentados ao público como personagens reais.

A dívida associada aos 15 anos das guerras de Washington, neste momento, está a ser usada para atacar a Segurança Social e a Medicare. O um por cento e os apologistas do "mercado livre" estão determinados a conseguir que os idosos paguem as guerras que permitiram a Israel reduzir a Palestina a um gueto e as guerras que enriqueceram os lucros e o poder do complexo militar e segurança, enquanto causavam o enorme problema dos refugiados na Europa.

Se os britânicos, ou um número suficiente deles, acordaram, talvez algo semelhante possa acontecer na América.

Muitos escrevem-me a mencionar as vossas frustrações com a família, com os amigos e associados que se contentam com o que ouvem na BBC, na Fox "News",na CNN e no New York Times. Obviamente, se todos fossem inteligentes e pudessem pensar por si ou até mesmo, tivessem tempo para considerar o que lhes é dito, não estaríamos no estado em que estamos.

A nossa tarefa é criar nas pessoas o hábito de pensar por si, para que tenhamos o pequeno número que é necessário para mudar o mundo. (Este "pequeno número" é relativo. Num país de 300 milhões de pessoas, provavelmente, "esse pequeno número" representará vários milhões.)

Discutir com os amigos não funciona. As discussões originam a hostilidade e a competitividade. Evitem discutir. Os vossos amigos e familiares não sabem nada. Sentam-se à frente da Fox "News" e da CNN e sofrem uma lavagem cerebral.

Talvez uma maneira de abordar os amigos e os familiares é fazer perguntas. Por exemplo, como pode haver 103 vítimas em Orlando sem nenhuma evidência visível de grande número de ambulâncias e dos paramédicos necessários para lidar com um número tão elevado de vítimas? Pedi aos meus leitores para me ajudarem a provar a credibilidade da história oficial e ninguém pode enviar provas visíveis de forma convincente. Como pode haver uma ocorrência tão grande sem a existência de provas abundantes?

Como é que os arranha-céus construídos de maneira reforçada para resistir a colisões de aviões, explodem, de repente, supostamente como resultado de danos assimétricos menores e de incêndios de baixa temperatura em diversos escritórios dispersos? Como pode a totalidade do conteúdo das torres ser pulverizada, quando não há energia gravitacional suficiente para realizar tal pulverização?

Como é possível que World Trade Center 7 tenha desabado em queda livre acelerada, sem haver uma demolição controlada? Por que razão duvidam que foi uma demolição controlada, quando o proprietário do edifício/WTC disse na TV (ainda está disponível online)   que "a decisão tomada foi demolir o prédio?"

No caso de se terem esquecido, o "desabamento"  de um edifício efectua-se através de uma demolição controlada. É preciso bastante tempo para armadilhar um edifício com explosivos, a fim de levar a cabo a demolição. Obviamente, o Edifício 7 não estava armadilhado em 11 de Setembro, de 2001.

Somos informados constantemente pelo Presidente, pelo Vice-Presidente, pelo Secretário de Estado, por vários senadores e representantes, pelos comandantes da NATO, pelos políticos da União Europeia, pelas ‘presstitutes = comunicação mediática vendida’ e por outros, que "a Rússia invadiu a Ucrânia."

Arranjem um minuto para pensar sobre esta mentira extraordinária. Está claro que, a evidência não é mais um factor para determinar o que está a ocorrer. Só a afirmação é que conta. Reservem um segundo para olhar para fora da Matriz. Seria realmente possível que a Ucrânia ainda existisse se a Rússia a tivesse invadido? Eu apostaria a minha vida que, 60 horas após uma invasão russa desse país, a Ucrânia voltaria a fazer parte da Rússia.

Lembrem-se de Agosto de 2008, quando o exército georgiano treinado e equipado pelos EUA e por Israel, invadiu o reino de pacífico da Ossétia do Sul, matando tropas de manutenção da paz russas e civis ossetianos. Putin estava nas Olimpíadas de Pequim, mas as Forças Armadas russas esmagaram rapidamente o exército georgiano, treinado e equipado pelos americanos e pelos israelitas. Putin tinha a Georgia sob controlo.

O que fez Putin depois de dar esta lição sobre a superioridade das Forças Armadas russas? Libertou a Geórgia e regressou à pátria.

Então, de acordo com a totalidade dos poderes políticos ocidentais e da comunicação mediática vendida, como é que Putin está determinado a reconstruir o Império Soviético? Putin libertou a Georgia. Nenhum poder na Terra poderia tê-lo forçado a libertar a Georgia. Mas Putin retirou as Forças Armadas da Rússia e deu a liberdade ao país. Presentemente, o anterior presidente georgiano é um agente americano na Ucrânia.

Se considerarem o número de pessoas estrangeiras, incluindo os cidadãos americanos e o ex-presidente da Geórgia, que servem no governo ucraniano, esse facto levanta questões sobre a chamada "Revolução de Maidan", ocorrida em Fevereiro de 2014. Se realmente foi uma revolta popular e não um golpe orquestrado por Washington, por que há tanta falta de ucranianos para formar o novo governo e têm de ser trazidos cidadãos estrangeiros para governar o país?

Não acredito em nenhuma explicação oficial sobre qualquer assunto. Os factos não são verdadeiros só porque o governo e a comunicação mediática vendida o diz. Tenham em mente que as explicações oficiais podem ser disfarces de agendas ocultas e de programas secretos. Se Washington e os meios de comunicação tiverem o controlo, iremos viver num mundo de mentiras destinadas a esconder os verdadeiros interesses dos que estão a ser beneficiados.

Não é, propriamente, o tipo de mundo onde qualquer um de nós gostaria de viver.