Jews are Destroying Western Society – Part 3
Introduction
Friedrich Engels
Destruction of the Family
Sex, The True “Russian Revolution”
Sex Education in Schools
The “Socialisation” of Russian Society
The Fallout
Civil Disobedience and Civil War
Jewish Revisionism and Misinformation
Some Disagreements
Connecting the Dots
Introduction
The topic of this series of essays is the Jewish-engineered destruction of Western civilisation, an agenda to be achieved by the successive disintegration of the nuclear family, itself preceded by the extermination of morals and religion. The signs of this agenda have been gathering slowly for hundreds of years, and today are everywhere to be seen. We need only look, and connect the dots of the seemingly disparate but yet clearly connected events and processes, which are now occurring more rapidly by the year. The thesis that the destruction of the nuclear family and Western society is the result of a coordinated, long-term Jewish agenda is a profound one, but the collected evidence easily makes it apparent that these phenomena are the result of a deliberate ideological project rather than organic social evolution. The evidence points to a coherent, organised and multi-pronged assault.
For a long time, the Khazar Jews have had plans to not only control the world but to exterminate the Gentile family unit, morals and Christianity. These attitudes and intentions have certainly existed for at least hundreds of years, but came into public focus in the late 1800s with the advent of what became known as Communism. It doesn’t seem widely-known, but Communism was 100% a Jewish creation, beginning with Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels and continuing from there. The evidence of this is so widely public, and irrefutable, that debate would be pointless.
Marx & Engels. Source
With the writings of Marx and Engels, and the spread of Communism, the agenda for the destruction of Western societies was made fully public. The programmed collapse of Western society was to begin with the combination of sexual morals, religion, and the family, with the focal point of female sexual morality being the key to their agenda. If sexual morality could be eliminated, all morality could suffer the same fate. And if female sexual morality disappeared, the family as a unit would also disintegrate and disappear. Then, upon elimination of the family, Western society itself would collapse into throngs of fragmented and atomised individuals, rudderless and vulnerable to Jewish “management” and control. The above agenda is so self-evident from both the writings and the actions of the Jewish Communists of yesterday, and of the Jews of today, that the assertion of societal destruction can hardly be disputed.
It seems reasonably clear that the Khazar Jews had these intentions in mind when fostering the various European revolutions in the 1700s and 1800s, though these events were only partially successful. The revolutions did succeed in eventually replacing monarchs with the Jewish-created multi-party “democracy”, but this was merely setting the stage. The main purpose of the multi-party system was not to involve “the people” in their government, but to create a system of government that was (1) vulnerable to essentially total corruption and control from behind the scenes, and (2) as a means to prevent the repeated, systematic (and justified) expulsion of the Jews from all countries. And yes, the Jews really did create “democracy”; this is why they created it; and this is why the Jewish media and book publishers have elevated it to the status of a holy religion that cannot by nature be questioned. I have written an E-book titled “Democracy, the Most Dangerous Religion”. [1] It contains many startling, but obvious, thoughts that have seldom (if ever) crossed Western minds. I strongly suggest you read it. It is available in English, and has been translated into Chinese, Polish, Romanian, and Estonian.
For this essay, I will begin with a brief introduction to Engels, then we will examine the 1917 Revolution in Russia. It must be emphatically noted that the so-called Russian Revolution was not “Russian” in any sense. It was instead a 100% Jewish revolution against Russia.
Friedrich Engels
Friedrich Engels at the barricades of Elberfeld in May 1849 – 1870. Source
In 1884, Engels wrote a treatise titled “The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State”. His core arguments were that early human societies were essentially communistic in nature, with all property (and women) shared. He argued that the patriarchal family “emerged as a mechanism to control inheritance and property, subordinating women in the process “. He argued further that the concept of the state arose to protect private property and enforce class dominance, and claimed that, with the Jewish Communist “classless society”, the state would eventually disappear. However, in addition to predicting (and planning) the elimination of the state as a body of sovereignty and governance, he wrapped his entire arguments in a swath of “female oppression”, essentially claiming this as the overwhelmingly fatal result of the development of Western society. It then naturally followed that a main aim of Jewish Communism was the “liberation” of women. However, (and this is where we can part company with Engels and Jewish Communism) the method designed to “liberate” women was more or less entirely sexual in nature. Lenin (a Jew) described Engel’s treatise as “one of the fundamental works of modern (Jewish) socialism”.
In “The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State”, [2] Engels argued that the monogamous family was not a natural institution. Thus, the first object of attack by the Jewish Bolsheviks on Gentile society was marriage, the attack led by forcing promiscuous sexuality on married women. By removing marriage from the province of the church, and by making divorce a simple matter of individual decree, not only would the family unit immediately begin to fragment and dissolve, but the Christian church would also suffer a fatal blow. Engels also wrote in 1883 that “It is a curious fact that with every great revolutionary movement the question of “free love” comes into the foreground”.
You can access Engels’ full treatise in English from Project Gutenberg as a text file here. [3] You can also access it in Kindle other formats here. [4] It makes for interesting reading because it is a mixture of some facts, much speculation, unjustified or unevidenced conclusions, and a huge dollop of ignorance, all wrapped in a shroud of Jewish psychopathology.
Destruction of the Family
Magnus Hirschfeld at Institute for Sexual Research, 1920.The Jewish Moral Corruption of Germany and America. Source
The Jewish Bolshevik vision of (Gentile) society was primarily based on the destruction and eventual elimination of the family, which would be a natural consequence of the promiscuous and uninhibited sexual unions by married women, this in turn supported by their financial emancipation. These portions of the Jewish agenda for Gentiles did not all arise with Marx and Engels; Jews had been openly promoting “free sexual union” for married women in the Middle Ages, and promoted this heavily during the periods of the European political revolutions they instigated in the 1700s and 1800s. By this latter date, the concepts of the destruction of Western (Gentile) society were being heavily promoted. However, it was generally assumed, if not known, that this would have been the inevitable consequence of the elimination (or destruction) of the family unit, the ideas of which were already well-developed and being promoted. And of course, the dissolution of the family unit as a social construct would itself be an inevitable consequence of the promiscuous and unfettered sexuality of women that the Jews were simultaneously promoting.
These ideas were all promulgated in a context of looking for “a more just social order”, but that was nonsense meant only to smoke up the room and bury the agenda (for Gentiles) in a mass of propaganda. Nevertheless, these ideas were fostered by the Jews from the Middle Ages onward, and were finally given an opportunity for realisation by the Jewish Bolsheviks who came to power in Russia through a coup d’état in 1917. It is true there were some obscure religious sects also promoting the ‘free love” aspects from the Middle Ages onward, but they had no intentions of destroying the family or society in the process. They were simply on a much narrower path of “sex without sin”.
It is beyond dispute or even question that the intention of the Jews when instigating the revolution in Russia, was primarily the destruction of the family, to be closely followed by the destruction of the Christian church. As soon as the Jewish Bolsheviks came to power in Russia, their Central Committee produced a complete code and body of laws on marriage and the family. This was a truly “revolutionary vision” of social relations based ostensibly on women’s equality (but effectively on the total abandonment of sexual morals and of morality itself) and the desired “withering away” of the family. [5]
Russian Government– April 1920: Russian politicians, top four left to right: Rykov, Radek, Pokrevsky, Kamenev, middle left to right:Trotsky, Lenin and Sverdlov, bottom left to right: Bukharin, Zinoviev, Krylenko, Kollontai and Lunacharsky. Source
Alexandra Kollontai, a Jew, and one of the most prominent Bolsheviks to promote the elimination of the family, stated that in 1917, at the time of the Revolution, the family was already outmoded. Kollontai produced multiple articles on women’s issues, generally stating that there were no longer any reasons for the existence of the family unit. In an article titled “Family and Communism”, she wrote that marriage had already become irrelevant because it contained no useful economic or social purposes. Kollontai further argued that the family constituted an inefficient use of labor, food, and fuel, and that it was “not only useless, but harmful”. Her picture of the family was the same as that of Engels in his writing “The Condition of the Working Class in England”. She wrote that “Just as housework withers away, so the obligation of parents to their children withers away”. In her view, “society” (composed of Jewish Communists) would feed, bring up, and educate the child.
Another step in the (Jewish) destruction of the (Gentile) family was taking children from their parents to be raised by the Jewish state, apparently “for their own good”. “Fortunately, the plans to take all the children away from their parents remained on paper, because there was a lack of funds and staff to establish so many nurseries.” [5a] Still, the Jewish Family Code, referred to above was another step to eliminating the family forever as a social unit. Kollontai predicted that a severe reduction of the parent-child bond was inevitable, writing that “The authority of the parents weakens and obedience is at an end”. She focused on obtaining insights into the bonds that held the family together, and sought ways to reduce or eliminate those bonds in order to dismantle the social family unit. According to Kollontai, the family would transform into a union of a sexually-liberated woman with men based on “mutual contracts” that would be voidable at a whim.
The Jewish Communists dismissed the power, and even the existence, of any emotional bonds between mothers and children, denigrating the role of the mother-child bond in infant survival and early childhood development. Since the state would assume the responsibilities of raising and educating children, the family would lose yet another social function that had historically provided its basis for existence. Another Bolshevik, V. Diushen, presented as “an educator”, claimed that the family deliberately places its (opposing) interests above those of society. He further claimed that (Gentile) “Mothers did children more harm than good” because they weren’t as “objective” as were the Jewish Bolsheviks.
Yet another Jewish Bolshevik by the name of A. G. Goikhbarg, the author of the Bolshevik’s new Russian Family Code, produced a legislative Act titled, “Family, Marriage, and Guardianship Law of the Soviet Republic”. In it, Goikhbarg instructed parents to reject their “narrow and irrational love for their children”, claiming that the Jewish state upbringing (of Gentile children) would provide “vastly better results than the private, individual, unscientific, and irrational approach of … ignorant (Gentile) parents”.
Goikhbarg went so far as to claim that “each day of the existence of [the Jewish code of marriage laws] undermines as much as possible the idea of individual marriage and any legal bonds between husband and wife”. In reality, the Jewish Bolshevik Family Code “totally severed the concept of marriage from that of family”. As one indication, in Russian society at the time, as in most societies, illegitimate children, those born out of wedlock or from adulterous mingling, were frowned upon, had no inheritance rights, and generally had a poor start in life. But to the Jews, with their over-riding eagerness for the free and promiscuous sexuality of women (Jewish in this case), bastard children were a perfectly natural and welcome part of society.
According to a Jewish Bolshevik named Iakov Brandenburgskii, as the (Jewish) government became more powerful in Russia, “the broad family group will gradually disappear”. These Jewish Bolshevik theorists claimed that capitalism had already undermined the family’s social and economic functions and, under Jewish Communism, the family would wither away and finally cease to exist entirely. That was the plan.
In 1929, the Jew Samuel Wolfson wrote a book titled “The Sociology of Marriage and the Family”. In that tome, he wrote “[The family] will be sent to a museum of antiquities so that it can rest next to the spinning wheel and the bronze axe, by the horse-drawn carriage, the steam engine, and the wired telephone”. [6] There is no way to misunderstand the words of these men, and their intentions cannot be more clear. Wolfson was in full agreement with Kollontai, and depicted the Jewish view of marriage as “little more than a hotel reservation where no deposit had been paid.” He claimed that marriage would have no legal status and its duration would be determined solely by the “mutual inclination” of the participants. Wolfson further stated that “The family as an “ethical unit” is simply nonsense”.
Much of the writing and preaching of Marx and Engels appears almost schizophrenic at times. On one hand, they proposed that the relation between men and women, parents and children – in other words, the family unit – was the basic premise of human existence. Yet on the other hand, they were promulgating the disassembly and eventual disappearance of that same family unit.
One of the main platforms in the Jewish Bolshevik agenda was to “liberate” women from the home and put them to work in factories. This agenda was promoted as freeing women from the drudgery of housekeeping, but in reality, it simply replaced that with the drudgery of factory work, while succeeding in the main purpose of dismantling the family unit. Engels clearly saw the inevitable result on family stability of married women working in factories, pointing out the “total neglect of children” that would result when both parents worked the necessary twelve to thirteen hours a day in the mill. He stated flatly that “The employment of women at once breaks up the family.”
Lenin continuously described housework as “the most unproductive, the most savage, and the most arduous work a woman can do”. He claimed that “petty housework crushes and “degrades” a woman, chains her to the kitchen and the nursery where she wastes her labor on barbarously unproductive, petty, nerve-wracking and stultifying drudgery”. I would note that moving women from the home to the factory was not an improvement, replacing the “barbarously unproductive drudgery” at home with 13-hour days of often dangerous and generally mind-numbing work in a factory.
Another Jewish author wrote that “the fetters of husband and wife” (i. e., the ties that bind) would become “obsolete”. These revolutionaries fully expected not only marriage and the family to wither away, but the law and the state as well. [7] Lenin’s treatise on “The State and Revolution” emphasised these views and was quite influential in subsequent Jewish thinking of the time. The theory promulgated in Jewish propaganda was that “Women would be freed to enter the public sphere on an equal basis with men, unhampered by the duties of the home. At last women would be equally educated, waged, and able to pursue their own individual goals and development.”
That sounds good, but the same agenda (and same writer) stated further that “Under such circumstances, marriage would become superfluous. Men and women would come together and separate as they wished. Free union would gradually replace marriage. The family, stripped of its previous social functions, would gradually wither away.“
Leon Trotsky, another Jewish Bolshevik, said that the bond between husband and wife would be freed, and that new relationships between women and men would develop based on “mutual feelings”. Use your imagination. The general Jewish Bolshevik agenda envisaged relations between women and men that were based on “free union” and “free love”. According to these Jews, the key to women’s emancipation was the abolition of the family unit, which was to be effected by first eliminating all sexual morality for women and encouraging – and even legislating – compulsory unlimited sexual liaisons. And the factory employment would provide women with the financial means to pursue this Jewish Nirvana.
Many of the Jewish Bolsheviks wanted to abolish marriage altogether, arguing that marriage was “a step backward”, that it was necessary to provide the (Gentile) population complete “freedom of marriage relations”. This theory was also sexual in origin, in that it essentially removed all sexual restrictions on women as one of the necessary conditions of individual freedom. Some even argued that the very concept of marriage violated the freedom of women “in the most intimate area and in their most elementary rights” – that area and rights being unlimited wanton sexual intercourse. The fundamental argument here by the Jews was that, since unlimited sexual intercourse by married women with men not their husbands (formerly frowned upon) was now to be the norm, the existence of a marriage bond would be a hindrance. They therefore set out to abolish the existing “compulsory monogamy” supported by the Christian church and the state.
They also fought against the concept of alimony, arguing that it was nothing other than a payment for sex”, and that free sex should not have economic consequences. The Bolsheviks stated that the task of their new “socialist society” was to destroy the “petty bourgeois social form of the family” because only then will the state really liberate women. The new (Jewish) Family Code (for Gentiles) was presented as a huge progressive move toward the freedom and independence of women but, more importantly, those who drafted it saw it as the first step toward the planned eventual extermination of the family. At the same time, the Jewish Bolsheviks – Goikhbarg being one main proponent – was that marriage was a crucial if temporary element in the Jews’ determination to destroy the Christian church because of its control of marriage.
The Jewish-produced “Little Soviet Encyclopedia” stated that “the family was the original form of slavery”, and predicted its imminent extinction. By the 1920s, the Jews were boasting that by breaking the (Gentile) family they had dealt a fatal blow to the “bourgeois system”. That system, of course, was one in which persons other than Jews had money and could be part of the elite and middle class.
Sex, The True “Russian Revolution”
There is no grounds for disputing the assertion that the Jewish Bolshevik vision for Russia was “liberating” women through unlimited – and legislated – extramarital sex. The Jewish Bolsheviks who engineered the Revolution in Russia (and elsewhere) had a seemingly limitless appetite for the depravities of sex, so much so that we can consider sex to have been “the lubricant” of the revolution. There is an excellent paper titled, “Women, the State and Revolution: Soviet Family Policy and Social Life, 1917-1936”. You can reference the entire paper here. [8]
This wasn’t only about encouraging and even legislating sexual promiscuity for women, but applied to publications as well. Reports are that the Jews produced “literally tons” of sexual publications, novels, articles, drawings about sex, and of course pornography in massive doses. Reports are that major newspapers were filled with sexual articles, and it was noted that women’s underwear occupied “an unnaturally large place” in the literature.
Alexandra Kollontai: Source:
For the Jews, the key to destroying the family unit in Russia was their determined promotion of “free love”. The Jewish priestess of this free love was Alexandra Kollontai, whom we have already met. Her book, “New Morality and the Working Class”, promoted the thesis that married (Gentile) women should be liberated not only economically, but also “psychologically”, i. e., sexually. She stated that married women should have free, unlimited and uninhibited sex with any number of men, and this was to be “sex without strings”. She claimed that all forms of sexual activity were acceptable for married women, and that the adoption of this behavior would protect women from male domination. From this, she stated that over time the family would “disappear” – as it obviously would. Kollontai presented her thesis on a platform of gender equality, but this was only smoke. Her fundamental claim was essentially that a woman’s sex drive (especially that of a married woman) was a natural instinct and that satisfying it should be considered as – and be as easy as – drinking a glass of water when thirsty. [9] She claimed that her goal was to “free women from sexual servitude”.
Kollontai argued that, like the family, sexual morality had been historically (and perversely) constructed primarily to oppress women and was irrelevant, claiming that there was neither morality nor immorality in nature. Her view, widely propagated, was that the sex act was merely a manifestation of a natural instinct of a healthy organism, and was neither shameful nor sinful.
Kollontai encouraged people to “experiment” with alternative family structures, at one point writing papers on having “marriages” in threes and fours. In every city, the Jews encouraged debates on sex, and discussed sexual “explorations” and sexual “experiments”. Use your imagination. It seemed that suddenly all members of Russian society were “exploring” their sexuality and “experimenting” with new ways of group coupling – all under the watchful eyes of the likes of Kollontai and others. [10] The Jews boasted at the time that their new government “did more to liberate human sexuality” than any society in history.
Same-sex marriage was made legal, and both homosexuals and lesbians were encouraged to live “open lives”, parading their brand of sexuality. The Jews repealed all bans on sodomy, as they did in France after the Jewish revolution in that country. And as they are doing in the West today. The Jews also avoided any legislation on, and removed all prohibitions against, incest, encouraging “the people” to make their own decisions in these matters.
The Jews also encouraged gender reassignment, the same psycho-pathology they are again proposing in the West today. They went so far as to grant permission for doctors to perform sex reassignment surgeries, although in the 1920s, these efforts would have been exceedingly crude. This and much more was discussed in a publication titled “Bolshevik Sexual Forensics”. [11] [12]
The Jewish Bolsheviks cleverly combined “political liberation” with what they termed “personal liberation”, the latter being primarily the promulgation of unhindered and wanton sexual intercourse by married women and young girls. The Jews’ position was that rigid sexual mores and morals were merely tools for the oppression of women by evil capitalists. From this questionable foundation, they produced the radical sexual reforms that aimed to “transform” – i. e., destroy – the family and society. One of the necessary aspects of this, as mentioned earlier, was the legalisation of free abortion, since the wanton sexuality prescribed for married women would inevitably lead to millions of unwanted out-of-wedlock pregnancies. This was couched in terms of women “taking control of their bodies” while providing them with “reproductive choices”.
In practice, the entire “liberation” of women was sexual. Married women working in factories would receive an income. This income in turn would provide the financial freedom to liberate the hordes of oppressed (Gentile) women by converting them into new hordes of nymphomaniacs and sexual psychopaths – free in the most literal sense. The purpose of the factory labor was to give all (Gentile) women the financial independence to pursue their new-found sexual freedom without fear of abandonment by the husband. Thus, the Gentile women were to be liberated both “economically and psychologically”, to say nothing of sexually.
There were a few Jewish Bolsheviks who saw a requirement for a bit of caution in the new “emancipation” of women. One M. I. Shishkevich wrote that “fear of pregnancy is still the great stumbling block to the free expression of (women’s) sexuality”, suggesting a need to “limit the sexual freedom of women”, but only “during the transition period”. However, and thankfully, abortion was also a Jewish “value”, and would solve the pregnancy problem until the advent of birth control pills.
It is interesting that Engels appeared to be arguing that the solution to any social disapproval of (married) women being openly promiscuous – and the resulting countless impregnations by men not their husbands – was the establishment of a society of matriarchal lineage. His argument was that exclusive lineage recognition of the female parent – due to the impossibility of determining paternity with promiscuous married women – would ensure that women were held in “high esteem”. This is of course the reason the Jews adopted a matriarchal lineage for themselves: Jewish women throughout history have always been sexually promiscuous and determining paternity was impossible until recently. A matriarchal lineage was the only possible solution.
The Jews did actually establish a matriarchal lineage in Russia and, surprisingly, promulgated this in 1917 at the onset of the Jewish coup d’état, long before their intentions for marriage and the family were publicly known. We must conclude the plans for the sexual destruction of the family was formed in detail when Lenin and his Bolshevik group had been training in the US. In the publication “The Marriage Laws of Soviet Russia”, the very first sentence in the section on family rights, states that “No distinction shall be made between the relationship established through marriage and that established by union outside of marriage”. [13] If it isn’t clear, this is formal legislative recognition in advance of all the bastard children that were certain to be born to married women in Russia after the Jewish agenda was implemented.
August Bebel, another Jew, extolled unrestricted sexuality, which was simply “the natural desires implanted in every healthy adult”. He wrote that the “Sexual impulse is neither moral nor immoral; it is simply natural, like hunger or thirst”. He claimed that modern marriages were “sexually unhappy” from what he termed the “double standard” of married women being discouraged or prevented from engaging in rampant promiscuity. According to Bebel, this had a “pernicious effect” that forced women to “suppress their most powerful instincts”. Until reading this, I wasn’t aware that the most powerful instinct of married women was to have sexual intercourse with as many other men as possible. However, Bebel saw the chastity of women as a “subjugation”. He wrote that “Nothing can prove the dependent position of women in a more emphatic and revolting way than these vastly differing conceptions in regard to the satisfaction of the same natural impulse”. Like Marx and Engels, he posited a free union founded on love in place of the “forced relations” created by “capitalism”. [14]
At some point in this essay, it should occur to you that the literal situation we are discussing is that of a few thousand Jews (who effected a coup in Russia) planning the destruction of an entire society of Gentiles. These few thousand Jews planned to abolish the (Gentile) family, turn over the upbringing and education of the entire nation’s (Gentile) children to a group of ideological Jews, to abolish the (Gentile) Christian religion, and to “liberate” all the (Gentile) females in Russia between the ages of 13 and 65 by turning them into sexually wanton psychopaths, and then to abort all the presumably unwanted unborn (Gentile) children. This is beginning to sound like a lab experiment. We can be forgiven for wondering why, if these were such prized Jewish values, they didn’t focus on their own people.
The Jewish Bolshevik Revolution in Russia began with Lenin effectively abolishing marriage as an institution in the publication of the Family Code and Marriage Laws. [15] He stipulated full “sexual freedom” for women, and promoting two additional Jewish “values” of homosexuality and abortion. The stated aim was exterminating the very concept of the family and destroying the old bourgeois sexual morality, the concepts of homosexuality, lesbianism, and multiple genders being vital to the overall thesis. The main, fundamental, thrust of the Jews was to “liberate” married women by removing all restrictions on their sexual relations with men. [16]
Sex Education in Schools
In conjunction with the legislation of compulsory sexual intercourse for adults, the propaganda was enhanced by a comprehensive program of what was (quite properly!) termed “sex education” in the middle and high schools, since it specifically “educated” the children to have as much sexual intercourse as possible with as many of their classmates as possible. The children were taught that the best male-female relationships had “no (emotional) feelings” between the boy and girl, and should be initiated simply from the need to satisfy biological urges. The published literature on this topic – written by Jews – is that the programs were educating young people about “eradicating ignorance about sex”, “preventing diseases”, and freeing them from “reactionary superstitions”.
These programs were primarily targeted at the youth, the age when hormones are flowing and young people would be most susceptible to such information. Boys were taught that their urges for sexual intercourse were not only natural, but conveyed a “right”. The corollary was that girls were basically pressured to submit to any and all advances for intercourse. Young girls were simply being manipulated into wanton sexual activity followed by the necessary abortions.
The ideology was cleverly psychological, and disturbingly aimed at eliminating entirely the very concept of sexual morals as a tool to dismantle the institution of marriage, and then of society itself. The children were taught that sexual intercourse was a normal daily activity, and that all concepts of religion and morality were designed only to defraud them of the enjoyment of their very nature. The psychological appeal was to aim the sexual freedom as the liberation of young girls and married women from an “oppressive patriarchal structure”. [13]
They were apparently quite successful. Reports state that, by the 1920s, most young Russians believed that love and marriage were “bourgeois relics” that limited freedom and humiliated women. They were taught, and apparently accepted, that they should lead a promiscuous and unrestrained sex life. However, the results were not entirely beneficial. The sex education program for children and teens apparently led to “great waves of rapes” in the schools. This was primarily the raping of elite upper- or middle-class girls by their working-class classmates. However, as one paper put it, with the youth, it could not be denied that their sexual fervor could spill into “questionable and colorful extremes”. [14] What a masterful understatement. However, since the boys were taught that sexual intercourse was a normal activity and a right, bereft of any moral or religious inhibitions, and since the girls were virtually commanded to submit, there was little point in asking.
The “Socialisation” of Russian Society
SOVIETS MAKE GIRLS PROPERTY OF STATE; Decrees Compel Them to Register at “Free Love Bureau” on Attaining 18 Years.The New York Times Archives. See the article in its original context from October 26, 1918, Page 5. Source
In the summer of 1918, only shortly after the Jewish Bolsheviks achieved power in Russia, they passed a “Decree on the Socialisation of Maidens and Ladies”. This decree made it compulsory for women between the ages of 18 and 30 to register with the Committee, with men then obtaining vouchers for their sexual “use”. There were reports of posters in Russian cities announcing the mobilisation of women ages 17 to 32 to be “distributed” amongst [men] who “require them”. The Jewish Bolsheviks actually turned women into “public property”. The announcement essentially declared that women between these ages would become the public property of all working people, and listed detailed terms:
- Women must fulfill their “public responsibility” by providing “sexual services” to workers.
- Individuals must not interfere with women’s “right to use.”
- Each worker may be allocated a certain number of times per month to unite with women.
Russian posters: Source:
This in Russia in the 1920s. The posters read: (1) “Every communist male can and must satisfy his sexual needs, and (2) Every communist female must aid him”.
Kollontai didn’t stop with the schools, but continued after graduation. With the Jewish “Youth Congress”, a statutory provision was implemented imposing on every young (Russian and Gentile) man and woman the obligation to satisfy the sexual desire of their comrades.
There was an interesting twist introduced into the free sex mantra in that some Jewish Bolsheviks believed that removing sex from the factories would increase workers’ effectiveness. One method to achieve this, was espoused by Aleksandr Yakovlev in “No Land in Sight”. His recommendation was that each Spring, all men and women should leave their factories in the city and go into the woods or mountains for an extended holiday. While there, they should all give themselves wholly to orgies of unlimited sexual intercourse until they were “fully exhausted”. They would then return to their factory jobs without further distractions, thus achieving an astonishing increase in productivity. That would never have occurred to me. [15]
“The new Family Code laws on marriage and the generally charged sexual atmosphere, encouraged a level of promiscuity and a casual approach to sex, that would have been unthinkable only years earlier. Nudism was one result of the “liberation” of women, with nude beaches formed in downtown Moscow and other cities, and with nude marches or protests sometimes containing 10,000 people. Mikhail Bulgakov, the Russian writer, wrote in his diary in 1924 that “Stark naked people wearing armbands reading “Down With Shame!” have recently appeared in Moscow”. [16] [17] There were multiple stories of nude people riding city buses in Russia, and much else.
I should perhaps make an effort here to ensure clarity. In the Russian schools, the Jews promoted free and uninhibited sexual intercourse among the students, essentially teaching the boys it was their “right” to use any classmate for sexual satisfaction, and that it was the girl’s “duty” to submit. They went farther with the Youth Groups, essentially legislating the proposition that every young man had a legal right to claim any young woman for his sexual satisfaction, at any time. It was essentially legislated that every young woman selected was legally bound to submit.
For adults, the “Decree on the Socialisation of Maidens and Ladies” made it legally compulsory for every woman under age 30 or 32 to “register” herself for sexual use, with any man being able to claim any of the women for such use at any time. These women, many of them married, were compelled by law to submit to any man for sexual use, to whatever extent was desired. It was not much different in the factories, and in other parts of society, where all women, almost all married, were subjected – by law – to submit to sexual intercourse to any man who wanted them. Yet the Jews engineered all this on the pretext of “liberating” women and giving them “control over their bodies”. But no women were liberated in Bolshevik Russia. Instead, they were all enslaved, and every girl and woman totally lost control of her body in the process. All of this has been so deeply buried by the Jew’s control of the media and publications that few persons anywhere are aware of this history.
In their thrust to destroy the family, a necessary precondition was the elimination of all sexual morals and the full sexual “liberation” of women. And, a necessary precondition for the full sexual liberation of women was the use of abortions as the means of birth control. The Jewish Bolsheviks legislated that women had a right to free abortions, merely for the asking. The immediate result was an astonishingly rapid decline in the birth rate and “a real slaughter of unborn children”. Reports are that in 1928 around 40% of pregnancies were aborted, increasing to over 70% by 1934. The Jews were so successful at promoting abortion – one of the Jews’ key “values” – that they apparently created a kind of “abortion culture” in Russia, where women and girls simply became habituated to terminating every pregnancy with an abortion, simply a means of birth control after the fact.
A note on Religion: From an ideological standpoint, the wanton sexuality of married women was an important weapon against Orthodox Christianity and the morals of the day. One of the key steps for “liberation” of Russian women was to undermine the authority of the Church, which the Jews hoped to accomplish by the abolition of religious (church) marriages, the institution of free abortion, and the legislation of limitless promiscuous sex, especially for married women. The Jews attempted other methods as well. They confiscated all church property, seized Christian schools and hospitals, and shut down religions presses and educational institutions. Having failed to exterminate the Christian church through these means, the Jews turned to the slaughter of most of the clergy and the burning or other destruction of most of the churches.
The Fallout
This Jewish program for the reconstruction of Russian Gentile society was in the end a disaster of unimaginable proportion. The essentially legislated “free love” resulted in a plague of prostitution, rapes, gang rapes, unwanted children, abortions, divorce, venereal diseases, and suicides. There were literal epidemics everywhere; epidemics of rape and gang rape, in schools, in factories, and in society generally. There was a literal epidemic of unwanted pregnancies and abortions, with hospitals and doctors overwhelmed with abortion requests. There was a flood of abandoned bastard children brought into the world. There was an epidemic of divorce, and another of venereal disease. One report tells us that in 1926, in one of the Moscow factories, more than 50 percent of female workers had syphilis, and these situations were not uncommon. There was an epidemic of sex-related alcohol abuse, depression, and suicide.
By the 1920s, rape in Russia had become an epidemic. As with the widespread rapes in middle and high schools mentioned earlier, there was apparently a virtual epidemic of rape among adults as well, primarily the widespread raping of former noble and middle-class women by working-class males. Several Jewish writers have observed that this raping of elite women by men of the lower classes was considered as merely a kind of “class justice”, thus downplaying and effectively excusing it as unworthy of mention. Also, this new Jewish “society” was breeding an entire generation of homeless orphans; official reports indicate that, by 1923, half of the children born in Moscow had been conceived out of wedlock, and many of them were abandoned in infancy.
“Prostitution flourished throughout the 1920s in the Soviet Union as years of revolutionary violence, political and economic instability, and the civil war left women especially vulnerable to unemployment. The majority of women lacked an education or formal work experience, and many were forced to participate in the sex trade after their husbands or fathers left for war.” [18]
“The Bolshevik Revolution promised a total transformation of Russian society, down to its most intimate details. Despite optimistic claims that bolshevism would overcome bourgeois depravity, the writings of the 1920s in all genres were awash in sexual adventure, promiscuity, various chauvinisms, date and gang rape, unwanted pregnancy, and sexually transmitted diseases, as well as sex-related alcohol abuse, depression, and suicide”. [19] [20]
Civil Disobedience and Civil War
A detachment of female workers in the Vasileostrovsky district of Petrograd before being sent to the front against the White Army. 1919 Source
Not everyone in Russia was seduced or intimidated into obeying the new Jewish family laws or the “liberation” of women. The 1917 Revolution led to mass civil disobedience and “extremely violent” civil war by 1918. In response, the Jews developed the theory of mass terror to subjugate the population. The Jews refined this concept into nearly an art form, which was employed by the US in many countries like Indonesia, Afghanistan and Iraq, and which today is referred to euphemistically as “pacification” of a people. But in fact, it was just random, uninhibited violence on a massive scale involving many millions of deaths of innocent civilians. The Jews encouraged all forms of social violence against any civil disobedience or group uprisings, sometimes slaughtering large numbers of people.
This mass terror was official Jewish policy that was spread and applied “without any inhibition whatsoever”. [21] “Lenin wrote that it was necessary to relentlessly “purify,” “clean” and “purge” Russian society of the “flees,” “bugs” and “parasites” infecting and polluting it”. [22] There was the “Red Terror” in the Autumn of 1918, where the Jews slaughtered countless thousands of “disobedient” Russians. There were mass executions of striking workers objecting to the “free sexuality” and permissible rapes on the job. They exterminated the entire population of the Cossacks, and so much more. They gathered and executed around 50,000 of the elite in the Crimea alone. The Jews launched a second “Red Terror” in the Ukraine in the middle of 1918, where they slaughtered, raped and exterminated much of the middle class in mass executions. It was this that led to the “pogroms” in Ukraine, where the people rose up against the Jews and killed perhaps 100,000 of them. But the Jews have rewritten history and we are today told these pogroms arose from unjustified “anti-Semitism”. That is very far from the truth.
As always, the Jews write their crimes and atrocities out of the history books and eventually out of human consciousness. This cannot be permitted to continue. I would add that the Jews have for 75 years used tales of the “holocaust” – the claimed killing of 6 million Jews by the Germans (the claim since reduced to 3 million and then to only 1.5 million), as a way to impose collective guilt on the entire world and by this means to manipulate the entire Gentile world. Whether the Jew’s “holocaust” was real or fabricated, is of no consequence for our purposes, since the Jews provably killed more than 65 million Russian civilians before they were done. And this only one of the great mass murders Jews have committed over the centuries. We could add at least 100 million each in India and China, and that doesn’t even scratch the surface.
It was after these episodes of civil disobedience that the Jews abandoned their sexual freedom agenda and turned wholesale to the Gulags and to exterminating the Russian population. I won’t dwell further on this topic here, but the Jews eventually killed more than 65 million Russians, more than 1/3 of the total population of the country. They simply slaughtered virtually the entire middle and upper classes, the educated and business classes, and nearly the entire Christian clergy in Russia, and then burned down all the churches. Yet not many people are aware of the fact that the Jews have been for centuries the greatest mass murderers in the history of the world. Alexander Solzhenitsyn tried to tell us in his series of books. [23] I don’t know how many listened to him.
In the end, the results of the Jewish sexual revolution in Russia were so bad that sexual freedom for women was eventually cancelled. Kollontai’s “liberated wanton woman” lasted only about ten years. Upon the death of Lenin, Stalin rescinded all the family code, outlawing abortion, re-criminalising homosexuality, condemning the free sex, and reinstating the family as the core social unit.
Jewish Revisionism and Misinformation
There is much Jewish misinformation on The Bolsheviks. The Jews have almost total control over the media and book publishing and distribution, and they ferociously suppress details of Jewish crime and anti-human behavior. As well, many semi-respected websites disguise their Jewish roots and present an ostensibly unbiased viewpoint while downplaying Jewish crimes and atrocities and rewriting history in the process.
One of these is Springer.com, a direct descendent of the Jew Julius Springer who was publishing in Germany in the 1800s. Springer have an article on the sexual aspect of Jewish Russia, but describe the Jew’s pathological obsession with sexual depravity as “official efforts, although ambiguous and inconsistent, to open up lifestyle options”. [24] And Springer describe Aleksandra Kollontai as “the leading Bolshevik exponent of lifestyle freedom”. To depict the Jewish sexual atrocities in Russia as “lifestyle changes” is unforgivably obscene. But the point is that most of the world’s publications and information sources are controlled by Jews, and they make fierce efforts to remove from human consciousness all the horrific negatives of their past.
One Jewish website proclaims the following misleading perspective:
“Imagine a world where women were property, traded like livestock, silenced by veils and worked to death by the age of 30. That was the context in which the Jewish Bolshevik revolution of 1917 launched history’s most radical experiment for women’s emancipation. The Bolsheviks devoted resources to ensure women were no longer slaves. They made childcare free, awarded equal pay and allowed women reproductive freedoms, reforms that were revolutionary for the time.” [25]
One paper tells us, a little too happily, it seemed to me, that it took seven centuries for free and unrestrained sex for (Jewish) married women to evolve to the Bolshevik vision of (Gentile) women’s “emancipation and independence”. Another (Jewish) document was filled with glowing praise of the social revolution results in Russia: “The talents and energy of the women after the revolution, owing to their free (sexual) activity, made them grow like plants in the sunshine after a shower has just passed. This new (sexual) life awakens the women, gives them experience and training, transforms them into revolutionary fighters and prized Communist workers.” [26]
Some recent papers boast that the Jewish Bolsheviks, with their “new family code” promulgated in 1917, “accomplished far more than the Russian nation had ever done, or even attempted”. The boasts are founded on the Jews altogether expelling the Christian religion from marriages, making divorce free on simple request by either party. Divorce in the new Jewish Russia was made easier than you might imagine. According to the Family Code, to effect and register a divorce it was often sufficient to simply send a postcard to the Marriage Registry Office. And of course, one of the greatest “accomplishments” of the Jews in Gentile Russia was in establishing women’s “rights” to unlimited promiscuous sex on the basis of “freedom”, “gender equality”, and liberation from “male domination”. We might question whether legislated sexual promiscuity for married women equates to “freedom”. According to one treatise, Goikhbarg’s code of family laws produced “the most progressive family legislation the world had ever seen”. I would say the definition of “progressive” might depend on one’s point of view.
There were many Jews not in Russia who wanted to lend their support to this reimagination of Gentile life. Thus, they praised the new Bolshevik family system, claiming the Jewish ideals and values being promulgated had been produced by an “astounding intelligence” that rescued women from “an endless cycle of oppression”. They claimed that for the first time in the history of the modern world, the inequality of women was ended. They claimed that sex had been “freed of the superstitions which had clouded and confused it”, that marriage had been “liberated from religion”, that divorce had been separated from “duplicity and deceit”. (No idea how). And, as a result, “morality” had been “emancipated” from “the stereotyped stupidities of the past”.
Ella Winter was a Jew (real name Leonore Wertheimer) [27] who produced a book titled “Red Virtue”, in which she wrote most approvingly of the Bolshevik transformation of Russian (Gentile) society. She praised their “rational, common-sense approach” to the family and the open expressions of female sexuality. Other Jews wrote that legalised (and almost universal) abortion in Russia was “the most remarkable and intelligent advance in modern morality”. Yet other Jews claimed that the policy of free and instant divorce was “one of the greatest revolutions of the ages”. All of these observers appeared very solidly impressed by the “quality” of sex education available to children and teenagers.
As to publications, other observers, again all Jews, stated that no subject in Russia had as much attention as sex. They claimed that indeed “the subject was omnipresent, but only in the sense of what was good or necessary”, and that everything the Jews published on sex was “agreeably wholesome, really pure”. Even better, they claimed that Jewish writers treated sexuality “with the social conscience of a doctor or teacher”, and that they “cleansed society” of anything that truly cheapened sex. Other Jews claimed that sex in the West was “publicly recognised and legitimised only in its most decadent form”, but that the Jews in Russia had found the correct path. Yet others praised the Jewish Bolsheviks for producing a “morality” that actually expressed the voluntary desire of Russian Gentile women to have uninhibited and open sexual intercourse with all men who might cross their path. Another Jewish observer wrote that the Jewish Bolsheviks had discovered “the key to a healthy sex life and rewarding emotional relationships”. [28]
To give you an idea of how desperately the Jews bury their own historical atrocities, I have here a link to an article – obviously written by a Jew – that claims the stories about legislated sexual intercourse, women’s bodies being public property, and all the rest, were merely “rumors” fabricated by a Russian teahouse owner. Further, that these rumors not only dealt a blow to the Bolshevik regime but also influenced later generations’ understanding of Soviet Russian history. And of course, this was all too bad because all the Jewish Bolsheviks ever did was to confiscate some noble property and introduce policies of land reform and factory ownership. The article even tells us that Lenin himself was violently against female sexual promiscuity. Yet we have surviving photos of the actual posters that were distributed throughout Russia, making these very points of the rights of all men to sexual satisfaction and the obligation of all women to submit.
I will make a further point: the above article appears in Chinese on a Chinese website. [29] This will provide some understanding of the wide reach of the efforts of Jews to not only bury their historical atrocities in the English-speaking Western nations, but to rewrite history and find gullible victims in every country to promote their entirely false versions of history. And the Jews will typically do this if there are fears of their atrocities being discovered. Whenever someone learns the truth about the obscenely evil portions of Jewish history and begins writing about them, there will be a flood of false history produced and widely disseminated. This is always done as a pre-emptive move on the recognised basis that we generally accept and believe the first thing we read about an event. Later, when the truth emerges into the public realm, it can be easily dismissed as “anti-Semitism” and “conspiracy theories”.
Some Disagreements
A note from the French media publication France 24: “October 1917 brought not only political but also sexual revolution to Russia, with the early Soviets promoting female emancipation and the end of the traditional family . . . For a brief time, groups encouraging free love flourished across the country, while nudists walked freely through the streets of Moscow. Some regions even tried to pass declarations outlawing the “privatisation” of women by their husbands, rebranding them “property of the state” to which every proletarian should have access. The movement found a natural ally in the Bolsheviks, one of whose slogans was “down with decency! And who claimed that “making love must be just as simple as drinking a glass of water”. [30]
My only argument with the above observations is that the movement for “nationalising” married women was not something that “found an ally” in the Jewish Bolsheviks but was something created, promulgated – and even legislated – by them.
A note from Peter Drucker’s paper on Sex and the Russian Revolution: “Alexandra Kollontai was one of the main architects and proponents of the Jew’s sexual revolution against the Gentile Russians, and her agenda was not merely theoretical but was put into practice. For Kollontai, “fleeting passion” was a legitimate basis – and the only necessary basis – for any woman, but especially a married woman, to have sexual intercourse with any man. She dismissed any “formal limits” on “love” – i. e., on the sexual conduct of women, and strongly recommended many kinds of “experimentation” in sexual relationships, claiming these had value. She further saw the Christian religion as being a major obstacle and the source of “sexual prejudice”, according to her. In other words, the Christian church and religion were a powerful hindrance to her vision of rampant and unlimited sexual promiscuity, and thus the religion needed to be destroyed.” [31]
In “Red War on the Family”, Samuel Saloman claimed that the Bolsheviks were “political tricksters” who spread “unholy propaganda”. He wrote that their “satanic majesties”, Lenin and Trotsky, “had succeeded in duping an entire population by promising an earthly paradise while creating an earthly hell”. He wrote further that Lenin had “unleashed a revolution only to secure the delights of lust”. And that “Freeing woman from the ‘slavery’ of the kitchen and the nursery had only one definite result, and that was to give her more time to devote herself to free and unrestrained sexual intercourse”. Another observer offered this opinion: “This free love idea is undoubtedly the greatest attack against the female sex that has ever been devised. Even the lowest form of savages who indulge in the wildest spirit of cannibalism is far superior to such barbarism as this indecent, hellish, state license. Never before has any portion of the world made such a retrograding step in civilization as Russia in her reign of (Jewish) Bolshevism.” [32]
Connecting the Dots
Due to the intense Jewish control of today’s media landscape, we are seldom given a true picture of any portion of history or even current events. Often, similar events occur sequentially in many locations but we are almost never informed of them. It is thus easy for us to consider an event, even a very serious one, as a kind of “one-off” occurrence and dismiss it as an aberration. It is only when we are informed that the same or similar events occurred in many places or countries, all following the same agenda, that we can understand that we are dealing with an organised plan.
I have sometimes used the example of Apple’s dispute with the Chinese government about computer warranties. China claimed the iPad was a computer and demanded a 2-year warranty; Apple claimed it was a phone, and refused. We can easily dismiss this as an unimportant minor dispute between a huge multi-national company and an “authoritarian” government. But when we discover that Apple had the same disputes with dozens of countries all over the world, attracting multiple fines and lawsuits in the process, that we realise there was something more at stake: Apple was arrogant enough to attempt to force governments all over the world to rewrite their warranty policies for the sake of the company’s profit ledger.
It is the same with the Jew’s agenda for destroying the Western family and society, and specifically with the implementation of the sexual “liberation” of women. Russia was not the only country where the Jews attempted precisely the same agenda as I have outlined above. In subsequent articles in this series, I will deal with similar attempts by the Jews to inflict essentially the same “social changes” in other countries, notably Hungary, as they did in Russia.
*
Mr. Romanoff’s writing has been translated into 34 languages and his articles posted on more than 150 foreign-language news and politics websites in more than 30 countries, as well as more than 150 English language platforms. Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai. He is one of the contributing authors to Cynthia McKinney’s new anthology ‘When China Sneezes’. (Chap. 2 — Dealing with Demons).
His full archive can be seen at
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/ + https://www.moonofshanghai.com/
He can be contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com
*
NOTES – Part 3
[1] Democracy –The Most Dangerous Religion
https://www.bluemoonofshanghai.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Democracy-The-Most-Dangerous-Religion-.pdf
[2] Friedrich Engels – “The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State”
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/origin_family.pdf
[3] P2roject Gutenberg: The origin of the family, private property, and the state – Engels
https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/33111/pg33111.txt
[4] Project Gutenberg eBook of Engels
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/33111
[5] Women, the State and Revolution: Soviet Family Policy and Social Life, 1917-1936
https://www.academia.edu/120780678/Women_the_State_and_Revolution_Soviet_Family_Policy_and_Social_Life_1917_1936
[6] Wolfson Samuel Y., Soviet Sociologist, The Sociology of Marriage and the Family; 1929
https://www.ozon.ru/product/sotsiologiya-braka-i-semi-1929-volfson-s-ya-890851975/
[7] The origins of the Bolshevik vision: Love unfettered, women free
https://www.cambridge.org/core
[8] Women, the State and Revolution: Soviet Family Policy and Social Life, 1917-1936
https://www.academia.edu/120780678/Women_the_State_and_Revolution_Soviet_Family_Policy_and_Social_Life_1917_1936
[9] Alexandra Kollontai: Theses on Communist Morality in the Sphere of Marital Relations
https://www.marxists.org/archive/kollonta/1921/theses-morality.htm
[10] Sex, liberation and the Russian Revolution
https://rupture.ie/articles/sex-liberation-russian-revolution
[11] Bolshevik Sexual Forensics
https://book.douban.com/subject/4481557/
[12] Bolshevik Sexual Forensics
https://cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501768217/bolshevik-sexual-forensics/
[13] The Marriage Laws of Soviet Russia
https://revolutionarydemocracy.org/archive/marriagelaws.pdf
[14] The origins of the Bolshevik vision: Love unfettered, women free
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/7813438C26991B590627661501C0EAC9/9780511665158c1_p1-58_CBO.pdf/
[15] The Marriage Laws of Soviet Russia
https://revolutionarydemocracy.org/archive/marriagelaws.pdf
[16] The Bolshevik Sexual Revolution
https://historia.org.pl/2015/07/08/bolszewicka-rewolucja-seksualna/
[13] The Bolsheviks And The Sexual Revolution: A Historical Perspective For Modern Health Discussions
https://healthdor.com/article/the-bolsheviks-and-the-sexual-revolution-a-historical-perspective-for-modern-health-discussions
[14] Sexual Revolution in Bolshevik Russia
https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9780822970873_A49443129/preview-9780822970873_A49443129.pdf
[15] Sexual Revolution in Bolshevik Russia – Gregory Carlton
https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9780822970873_A49443129/preview-9780822970873_A49443129.pdf
[16] How sexual revolution exploded (and imploded) across 1920s Russia (PHOTOS)
https://www.russiabeyond.com/history/328265-russian-sexual-revolution
[17] How sexual revolution exploded (and imploded) across 1920s Russia (PHOTOS)
https://www.rbth.com/history/328265-russian-sexual-revolution
[18] The Oldest Profession and the New Soviet Woman: Sex Work and Ideology in the Soviet Union
https://opus.uleth.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/06fb0fba-0cfb-453c-814a-0b244ec36fa0/content
[19] Sexual Revolution in Bolshevik Russia
https://upittpress.org/books/9780822959489/
[20] Sexual Revolution in Bolshevik Russia.
https://academic.oup.com/ahr/article-abstract/110/5/1631/78838?redirectedFrom=fulltext
[21] Crimes and Mass Violence of the Russian Civil Wars (1918-1921)
https://www.sciencespo.fr/mass-violence-war-massacre-resistance/en/document/crimes-and-mass-violence-russian-civil-wars-1918-1921.html
[22] Lenin, How to organize the emulation?, December 1917
[23] Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn Books In Order
https://www.bookseriesinorder.com/aleksandr-solzhenitsyn/
[24] The ideology of “Sex Love” in postrevolutionary Russia: Lenin, Kollontai, and the politics of lifestyle liberation
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01083246
[25] The Bolsheviks’ vision for women and liberation
https://www.greenleft.org.au/2025/1427/analysis/bolsheviks-vision-women-and-liberation
[26] Revolutions: Russia 1896 – 26 October 1917: Bolshevik Women’s Rights
https://materchristi.libguides.com/c.php?g=941418&p=6816086
[27] Ella Winter
https://spartacus-educational.com/Aella_winter.htm
[28] Sexual Revolution in Bolshevik Russia
https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9780822970873_A49443129/preview-9780822970873_A49443129.pdf
[29] Was the system of public wives implemented during the Soviet period?
https://www.toutiao.com/article/7442201473699611188/?wid=1784637755585
[30] Russia’s brief sexual revolution after October 1917
https://www.france24.com/en/20171028-russias-brief-sexual-revolution-after-october-1917
[31] Sex and the Russian Revolution – Peter Drucker
https://againstthecurrent.org/atc193/p5244/
[32] Sexual Revolution in Bolshevik Russia
https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9780822970873_A49443129/preview-9780822970873_A49443129.pdf
*
This article may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. This content is being made available under the Fair Use doctrine, and is for educational and information purposes only. There is no commercial use of this content.
Jews are Plundering the World — New!
Who Starts All The Wars?Jews are Plundering the World — New!
What we Are Not Told :German POWs in America – What Happened to Them?
The Jewish Hasbara in All its Glory
Democracy – The Most Dangerous Religion
NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 1 — How the US Became Rich
NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 2 — Life in a Failed State
NATIONS BUILT ON LIES — Volume 3 — The Branding of America
Police State America Volume One
Police State America Volume Two
THE WORLD OF BIOLOGICAL WARFARE
False Flags and Conspiracy Theories
Kamila Valieva
LARRY ROMANOFF FREE E-BOOKS & PDF ARTICLES
Copyright © Larry Romanoff, Blue Moon of Shanghai, Moon of Shanghai, 2026
/https://www.niagarafallsreview.ca/content/dam/thestar/news/canada/2021/09/25/huawei-executive-meng-wanzhou-receives-warm-welcome-upon-return-to-china/_1_meng_wanzhou_2.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.