readers report that they
have found no evidence of bodies or blood. One person reports that a TV station
posted names of some victims, which is the way the absence of Sandy Hook bodies
One person who said he is a veteran said the
AR-15 can have a 30-round clip. That would mean four reloadings in order to
shoot 103 people. The veteran said that the rifle can be reloaded in 5 seconds:
one clip is dropped out, another put in, and the bolt released. But 5 seconds
is not fast enough to prevent being rushed. Remember, sprinters can cover 100
yards—300 feet—in less than 10 seconds. Ordinary people who are not couch
potatoes can cover 300 feet in 20 seconds. That means they can cover 150 feet
in 10 seconds or 75 feet in 5 seconds or 15 feet in 1 second.. In the crowded
club, people were likely no more than 10 feet from the shooter, 20 feet at the
most. Moreover, if there is only one shooter, he can be rushed in an arc that
he cannot possibly cover. It is difficult to imagine that there were no veterans
in the club, no people aware that guns run out of bullets and have to be
reloaded and that so many people would miss four opportunities to disarm the
shooter. It is hard to imagine that none of the hundreds of people present were
capable of presence of mind. Bottles could be thrown at him, glasses, chairs.
And no one did anything?
Mainly what readers have reported is evidence
that the Orlando shooting is a hoax. One reader sent me a video in which a
skeptic uses a RT video to show that the same three allegedly injured people,
who so far are the only victims we have been shown, are being carried toward
the night club, not away from it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiLk-V9DFpc
Here are readers reporting their inability to
find any real evidence. Somehow 103 people were shot and there is no visible
Dear Mr. Roberts, in response to your request
for evidence regarding the Orlando shooting, I held my nose and forced myself
to watch about an hour and a half of fox and cnn. No blood whatsoever. Nothing
real about any of the videos or stupid interviews with alleged victims. I knew
we were being lied to the first night when Fox News trotted out Bernard Kerik.
We know that traitor lied to us about 911. Why would we believe anything that
evil bastard said about this event. Thanks for such a great article. You really
nailed it. Dutch.
I was watching one of the networks at a local
eatery. My working assumption on these mass shootings is that they are fake,
either entirely so, as you mildly suggest in your latest article, or
perpetrated by government informants. The cameo profiles of victims began
appearing on TV last night, as my wife and I sat at a bar-restaurant eating
chicken wings. Who believes this stuff? Pepe Escobar and others are also
articulating skepticism on their Facebook pages. Is this a distraction from
some important stuff going down at Bilderberg?
Thank you for your great work. I agree with
your take on Orlando,San Bernardino,etc. Do you think there is a legal way to
expose the people that perform these fictitious acts (I.e perhaps class action
lawsuits against the crisis actors, etc).? Thanks again for all your efforts.
A fat, crying woman under shock yells out a
detailed story to the cameras, without stopping. It seems she practiced the
script for a week or so. Such poor acting just causes pity. Someone should have
said : \” Madame, please slow down. Fetch your script and come back for a
second take, OK ?\”
It took 3 hours for the police to proceed with
an assault. 53 wounded
people lay officially inside the establishment, crying for help. Are there
recordings of these desperate yells ? Fifty three folks !
I searched Orlando on You Tube (easy, fast, no
sound, and no blood). Thank God, actually.
Was wondering what your take is on this.
Veterans Today has it as most likely another false flag. Like you pointed out,
many groups to benefit from this. The DEMS are pushing hard for gun control,
Israel is ecstatic of more hatred towards Muslims, the DOD loves more war
money, and the beat goes on. I was looking for ambulances and paramedics, but
saw none. Then the BOZO, known as the President here, gets on TV asap and
pushes gun control, never mentions anything else. He was cold and remorseless, and
walked away fast. Meanwhile, the Congress and President and Homeland Insecurity
are bringing in crateloads of questionable immigrants, some handled by
religious groups no less (raking in the dough).
I have not seen any evidence, but I am a bit
\’over-the-hill\'(62 yrs old) when it comes to comprehensive internet searches.
However, I asked my computer savvy 24 yr-old son, and he has not found any
videos of the carnage inside nor out. He did suggest to me that if anyone did
capture anything on their cell phone, etc., that the police/authorities would
immediately confiscate it. I don\’t know though… Please let us peons know if
you find anything remotely credible. thank you PCR
I appreciate readers bringing to my attention
more evidence that suggests we are witnessing another drill, like the announced
drill at the Boston Marathon, turned into a fake terrorist attack. That indeed
might be what the Orlando shooting was. However, remember, our purpose is not
to disprove the official story, but to find evidence in its behalf.
So far all we have are official statements and
testimony by what seem to be crisis actors. 103 people cannot be shot without
there being real evidence.
It has to be somewhere.
My cautionary statement was that we should not
believe massive terrorist attacks without evidence, especially when we know for
an absolute fact that the government lied to us about Saddam Hussein, Assad,
and Libya. These lies have kept us at work destroying Muslim countries for 15
years, with a consequence that Europe is being overrun with refugees from our
wars based on nothing but the government’s lies.
It is not an unreasonable conclusion that a
government that will lie to us about Iraq, Libya, Syria, the economic condition
of the country and that will lie to the 9/11 Commission might also lie to us
about Boston, Sandy Hook, San Bernandino, and Orlando.
My point is simply that we are given stories
based not on visible evidence but on claims. These kind of events have to leave
massive evidence, but somehow it is not visible.
To recap, we are trying to see if we can find
real evidence that supports the official story. We are not trying to disprove
the official story but to prove it.
If we cannot prove the story, we are entitled
to disbelieve it.