Greenpeace has done that part of the world whose representatives are so
corrupt or so stupid as to sign on to the Trans-Pacific and Trans-Atlantic
“partnerships” a great service. Greenpeace secured and leaked the secret TTIP
documents that Washington and global corporations are pushing on Europe. The
official documents prove that my description of these “partnerships” when they
first appeared in the news is totally correct.
These so-called “free trade agreements” are not trade agreements. The
purpose of the “partnerships,” which were drafted by global corporations, is to
make corporations immune to the laws of soverign countries in which they do
business. Any country’s sovereign law whether social, environmental, food
safety, labor protections—any law or regulation—that impacts a corporation’s
profits is labeled a “restraint on trade.” The “partnerships” permit
corporations to file a suit that overturns the law or regulation and also
awards the corporation damages paid by the taxpayers of the country that tried
to protect its environment or the safety of its food and workers.
The law suit is not heard in the courts of the country or in any court.
It is heard in a corporate tribunal in which corporations serve as judge, jury,
In other words, the “partnerships” give global corporations the power to
overturn democratic outcomes. Allegedly, Europe consists of democracies.
Democracies pass laws protecting the environment and the safety of food and
labor, but these laws democratically enacted reduce profits. Anything less than
a sweatshop, with starvation wages, no environmental protection, no safety
legislation for food or worker, can be overturned at will by global
corporations under the terms of the “partnerships.”
Only a traitor, a well paid one, could sign such a pact.
In my opinion, corporate taxation can also be overturned as it obviously
The Trans-Atlantic and Trans-Pacific “partnerships” have been conducted
in secrecy. The reason is obvious. Had people known how they were being sold
out, there would have been a firestorm of protest. The corporate shills and
their propagandists in the financial media could deny my revelations, because I
had no official documents to release.
The “partnership” agreements are treaties. Under the US Constitution,
treaties are the prerogative of Congress, not the prerogative of an executive
brance appointed Trade Representative who represents not the people but the
corporations seeking the advantage. To avoid the US Constitution, the
agreements are defined as non-treaties. You see how the groundwork for
corruption is established.
The way it works is that the appointed US Trade Representative
“negotiates” with appointed trade representatives of other countries. Any
resistance to the deal is overcome with bribes and intimidation. All of the
negotiation is conducted in secrecy. When the trade representatives sign on to
the deal, it is presented to the legislatures of the countries. The legislators
are told that they must approve the pact and not endanger all the hard work
that has gone on for so long and that is in everybody’s interest as attested to
by all of the bribed and coerced trade representatives.
These “trade pacts” originate in the US, because American global
corporations and the American mega-banks are the largest players in the world
economy, and the agreements that the corporations walk through the process give
the American companies economic hegemony over the countries that sign the
agreements. The Trans-Atlantic and Trans-Pacific “partnerships” are tools of US
Today (May 3, 2016) I debated on Press TV Sean O’Grady, the financial
editor of the UK newspaper the Independent. It is extraordinary
that O’Grady took a line totally opposite to that of his newspaper. I suggested
to him that perhaps he should read his own newspaper.
Today an article in the Independent reported that the
leaked “documents show that US corporations will be granted unprecedented
powers over any new public health or safety regulations to be introduced in future.
If any European government does dare to bring in laws to raise social or
environmental standards, TTIP will grant US investors the right to sue for loss
of profits in their own corporate court system that is unavailable to domestic
firms, governments or anyone else. For all those who said that we were
scaremongering and that the EU would never allow this to happen, we were right
and you were wrong.”
As I understand it, the situation is worse than the article describes.
TTIP applies to laws already on the books, such as France’s laws against GMO
seeds and food products.
The Independent article continues:
“Today’s shock leak of the text of the Transatlantic Trade and
Investment Partnership (TTIP) marks the beginning of the end for the hated
EU-US trade deal, and a key moment in the Brexit debate. The unelected
negotiators have kept the talks going until now by means of a fanatical level
of secrecy, with threats of criminal prosecution for anyone divulging the
“Now, for the first time, the people of Europe can see for themselves
what the European Commission has been doing under cover of darkness – and it is
not pretty. The leaked TTIP documents, published by Greenpeace this morning,
run to 248 pages and cover 13 of the 17 chapters where the final agreement has
begun to take shape. The texts include highly controversial subjects such as EU
food safety standards, already known to be at risk from TTIP, as well as
details of specific threats such as the US plan to end Europe’s ban on genetically
“The leaked texts also reveal how the European Commission is preparing
to open up the European economy to unfair competition from giant US
corporations, despite acknowledging the disastrous consequences this will bring
to European producers, who have to meet far higher standards than pertain in
“According to official statistics, at least one million jobs will be
lost as a direct result of TTIP – and twice that many if the full deal is
allowed to go through. Yet we can now see that EU negotiators are preparing to
trade away whole sectors of our economies in TTIP, with no care for the human
“The European Commission slapped a 30-year ban on public access to the
TTIP negotiating texts at the beginning of the talks in 2013, in the full
knowledge that they would not be able to survive the outcry if people were
given sight of the deal. In response, campaigners called for a ‘Dracula
strategy’ against the agreement: expose the vampire to sunlight and it will
die. Today the door has been flung open and the first rays of sunlight shone on
TTIP. The EU negotiators will never be able to crawl back into the shadows
“For those of us in the thick of the EU referendum debate, the contempt
shown by the TTIP negotiators to the people of Europe is the most potent
reminder of the democratic deficit at the heart of the EU institutions.”
In our debate Sean O’Grady performed as a shill, a propagandist for the
corporate interests behind TTIP. He said that it was a free trade agreement
that benefitted everyone just as NAFTA and other such agreements have proved to
be the case. Tell that to all the displaced American workers.
He said that it was unfortunate that the secrecy had possibly hurt the
agreement’s prospects and that it would have been better if the pact’s
provisions had been known as they were negotiated. That way, he said, the
agreement would not be threatened by the shock effect of the leaked documents.
O’Grady also claimed that no one has thus far agreed to the pact despite
the fact that the representatives have agreed to the pact. Perhaps what he
means is that legislatures have not
given their approval.
The headline on the Independent article thinks the leak
will prevent approval: “After the leaks showing what it stands for, this could
really be the end for TTIP.” If so, O’Grady regards it as a great loss. For the
global corporations, of course, not for the peoples it would exploit.
The Greenpeace revelations should deep-six the pact, but I am uncertain.
French president Hollande says, provisionally, that France will not sign the
pact as it is. In other words, give us some fuzzy language to make it look like
we got it fixed.
The EU’s chief negotiator, Ignacio Garcia Bercero, a likely recipient of
a large bribe, rushed to the defense of TTIP by declaring Greenpeace to be
“flatly wrong.” Bercero’s statement makes no sense. Greenpeace released the
official documents. No one denies that the leaked documents are legitimate. So
apparently Bercero’s position is that the official documents are wrong. He
sounds like a guy working hard for his money.
Bercero, went on to say, according to the BBC, that “it is not correct
to say the US is pushing for lowering of the level of protection in the EU.”
This is an amazing lie ! Those who are trying to put a good face on the leak
themselves admit that this is precisely what the US is trying to do. They claim
that the Europeans haven’t yet given in.
It is disingeneous for Bercero or O’Grady or anyone to pretend that TTIP
has not been from the very beginning about establishing global corporate
hegemony over the governments of democratic countries. I pointed this out when
the corporations first made their move. There is no doubt whatsoever that the
Trans-Atlantic and Trans-Pacific “partnerships” are about giving global
capitalism immunity from the laws of sovereign countries.
EU Trade Commissioner Cecilla Malmstroem is, according to the BBC,
“steering the TTIP talks.” Malmstroem, another likely recipient of a large
bribe, says: “I am simply not in the business of lowering standards.” http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36185746
Her statement is misleading. She is not in the business of lowering
standards. She is in the business of making it possible for global capitalism
to overthrow all standards, high and low.
From my encounter today with Sean O’Grady, a person whose integrity I no
longer respect, I expect the corporate bought-and-paid-for Western financial
press and governments to close ranks and discredit the leaked documents as some
kind of Greenpeace “conspiracy theory.” Even in my presence, a former Assistant
Secretary of the US Treasury and Wall Street Journal editor, O’Grady had no
compunction about misrepresenting to my face the agreement as a good one harmed
only by secrecy. If it hadn’t been secret, said O’Grady, it would have been OK.
All of the blather about free trade and tariff reduction is mere cover
for the only purpose of TTIP, which is to establish American economic
imperialism over the peoples whose governments sold them out for money.